英国封锁期间女性生殖器切割创伤和心理健康支持:探索女性经历

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
P. Mulongo, Roxanne Khan, S. McAndrew, M. McKeown
{"title":"英国封锁期间女性生殖器切割创伤和心理健康支持:探索女性经历","authors":"P. Mulongo, Roxanne Khan, S. McAndrew, M. McKeown","doi":"10.1108/jacpr-05-2022-0712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe purpose of this study is to report findings from interviews with seven African-heritage women attending a female genital mutilation (FGM) Clinic in the north of England, during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Clinic, established several years before the pandemic, provides specialist therapeutic support to women and girls from minority ethnic communities who are affected by harmful “traditional” practices, including FGM. The services provided by the Clinic include early interventions, peer support, community engagement and empowerment around FGM.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData was collected during an online focus group discussion with seven women who had received counselling for FGM, to gain insight into their lived experiences of therapeutic support during the pandemic.\n\n\nFindings\nUsing Braun and Clarke (2006) six-step thematic analysis, four superordinate themes derived from the data: consistency and continuity; safety in shared experience and creativity; feeling heard, feeling stronger; and altruism and desire for change.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nIt is important to recognise some limitations within this study. It is based on one focus group discussion that involved seven participants, who had experienced FGM, were living in a targeted area and whose mental health had been further compromised by the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of this study indicate that it is essential to consider participants’ experiences of receiving therapeutic support during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was observed that emotional stressors linked with participants’ experiences of FGM may be exacerbated by those related to COVID-19.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThere is a need to conduct similar research, perhaps on an individual basis, that would reach a wider sample of women from ethnic minority populations who are survivors of FGM, including those from FGM practicing communities who have been hospitalised through their deteriorating mental health. This would add to the small but growing body of evidence, to provide a better understanding of the experiences of their mental health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic and perhaps better identify effective therapeutic interventions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThese themes provide an insight into these women’s experiences of the trauma associated with FGM and receiving mental health support during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female genital mutilation (FGM) trauma and mental health support during the UK lockdown: exploring women’s experiences\",\"authors\":\"P. Mulongo, Roxanne Khan, S. McAndrew, M. McKeown\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jacpr-05-2022-0712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to report findings from interviews with seven African-heritage women attending a female genital mutilation (FGM) Clinic in the north of England, during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Clinic, established several years before the pandemic, provides specialist therapeutic support to women and girls from minority ethnic communities who are affected by harmful “traditional” practices, including FGM. The services provided by the Clinic include early interventions, peer support, community engagement and empowerment around FGM.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nData was collected during an online focus group discussion with seven women who had received counselling for FGM, to gain insight into their lived experiences of therapeutic support during the pandemic.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nUsing Braun and Clarke (2006) six-step thematic analysis, four superordinate themes derived from the data: consistency and continuity; safety in shared experience and creativity; feeling heard, feeling stronger; and altruism and desire for change.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nIt is important to recognise some limitations within this study. It is based on one focus group discussion that involved seven participants, who had experienced FGM, were living in a targeted area and whose mental health had been further compromised by the COVID-19 pandemic.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings of this study indicate that it is essential to consider participants’ experiences of receiving therapeutic support during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was observed that emotional stressors linked with participants’ experiences of FGM may be exacerbated by those related to COVID-19.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThere is a need to conduct similar research, perhaps on an individual basis, that would reach a wider sample of women from ethnic minority populations who are survivors of FGM, including those from FGM practicing communities who have been hospitalised through their deteriorating mental health. This would add to the small but growing body of evidence, to provide a better understanding of the experiences of their mental health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic and perhaps better identify effective therapeutic interventions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThese themes provide an insight into these women’s experiences of the trauma associated with FGM and receiving mental health support during the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-05-2022-0712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-05-2022-0712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是报告对新冠肺炎封锁期间在英格兰北部一家女性生殖器切割诊所就诊的七名非洲孕妇的采访结果。该诊所成立于疫情爆发前几年,为少数民族社区受包括女性生殖器切割在内的有害“传统”习俗影响的妇女和女孩提供专业治疗支持。诊所提供的服务包括围绕女性生殖器切割的早期干预、同伴支持、社区参与和赋权。设计/方法/方法在与七名接受过女性生殖器切割咨询的女性进行的在线焦点小组讨论中收集了数据,以深入了解她们在疫情期间的治疗支持生活经历。发现使用Braun和Clarke(2006)的六步主题分析,从数据中得出四个上级主题:一致性和连续性;共享经验和创造力中的安全;感觉被倾听,感觉更强大;利他主义和对变革的渴望。研究局限性/含义认识到本研究中的一些局限性很重要。它基于一个焦点小组的讨论,该讨论涉及七名参与者,他们经历过女性生殖器切割,生活在目标地区,其心理健康因新冠肺炎大流行而进一步受损。实际意义本研究结果表明,考虑参与者在新冠肺炎大流行期间接受治疗支持的经历至关重要。据观察,与参与者的女性生殖器切割经历相关的情绪压力源可能会因与COVID-19相关的压力源而加剧。社会影响有必要进行类似的研究,可能是在个人基础上,以接触少数民族女性生殖器切割幸存者的更广泛样本,包括那些因心理健康状况恶化而住院的女性生殖器切割实践社区的人。这将增加少量但不断增加的证据,以更好地了解他们在新冠肺炎大流行期间的心理健康需求,并可能更好地确定有效的治疗干预措施。独创性/价值这些主题深入了解了这些女性在疫情期间与女性生殖器切割和接受心理健康支持相关的创伤经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Female genital mutilation (FGM) trauma and mental health support during the UK lockdown: exploring women’s experiences
Purpose The purpose of this study is to report findings from interviews with seven African-heritage women attending a female genital mutilation (FGM) Clinic in the north of England, during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Clinic, established several years before the pandemic, provides specialist therapeutic support to women and girls from minority ethnic communities who are affected by harmful “traditional” practices, including FGM. The services provided by the Clinic include early interventions, peer support, community engagement and empowerment around FGM. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected during an online focus group discussion with seven women who had received counselling for FGM, to gain insight into their lived experiences of therapeutic support during the pandemic. Findings Using Braun and Clarke (2006) six-step thematic analysis, four superordinate themes derived from the data: consistency and continuity; safety in shared experience and creativity; feeling heard, feeling stronger; and altruism and desire for change. Research limitations/implications It is important to recognise some limitations within this study. It is based on one focus group discussion that involved seven participants, who had experienced FGM, were living in a targeted area and whose mental health had been further compromised by the COVID-19 pandemic. Practical implications The findings of this study indicate that it is essential to consider participants’ experiences of receiving therapeutic support during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was observed that emotional stressors linked with participants’ experiences of FGM may be exacerbated by those related to COVID-19. Social implications There is a need to conduct similar research, perhaps on an individual basis, that would reach a wider sample of women from ethnic minority populations who are survivors of FGM, including those from FGM practicing communities who have been hospitalised through their deteriorating mental health. This would add to the small but growing body of evidence, to provide a better understanding of the experiences of their mental health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic and perhaps better identify effective therapeutic interventions. Originality/value These themes provide an insight into these women’s experiences of the trauma associated with FGM and receiving mental health support during the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信