管理艺术机构

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
B. Heidelberg
{"title":"管理艺术机构","authors":"B. Heidelberg","doi":"10.1080/10632921.2023.2203685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Survey textbooks have a lot to accomplish. Providing students and practitioners with an overview of a field is a daunting task with many things for an author to consider. There the Victoria Harbor seemed to be the most pressing problems that the administration of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“government”) had to address. The years 2006–2007 represent a turning moment in the post-colonial history of built heritage protection, as the following chapter indicates. The decision of the government to demolish several built heritage sites caused public protest as well as unsuccessful litigation. After 2007, the seventh chapter suggests, Hong Kong’s built heritage policy underwent considerable change. The establishment of the New Antiquities Authority, the adoption of a new policy regarding heritage impact assessment as well as the implementation of a scheme for the revitalization of historic buildings were some of the most important initiatives. The eighth chapter operates as a bridge with the next and final chapter. It takes stock of the bright and dark sides of protecting built heritage in Hong Kong after 2007. In terms of successes, the growing consultation of public opinion concerning heritage-related matters is noticeable (77). By contrast, amongst the darker sides are the disputes about the inscription of certain heritage sites into the World Heritage List and the practical implementation of the heritage impact assessment scheme. Gallagher in the final chapter pushes for the reform of Hong Kong’s built heritage law and policy by listing specific recommendations. Gazing to the future, Gallagher, concludes with confidence about the long-term preservation of Hong Kong’s built heritage (111). From the perspective of the reviewers, Protecting Built Heritage in Hong Kong fills the lacuna of scholarly research into built heritage legislation and policy in Hong Kong by providing a comprehensive analysis. The book is constructive, enlightening, concise and easily accessible to the average reader. Consisting of 111 pages, the book can be read from cover to cover in a reasonably short amount of time. The book throws a net that is both broad and deep enough to appeal to both academics and a wider audience. The book is welcomed by legal scholars and students but also heritage professionals working in the field of cultural heritage and policy as well as to those who maintain an interest to learn more about Hong Kong’s rich built heritage.","PeriodicalId":45760,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Arts Organizations\",\"authors\":\"B. Heidelberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632921.2023.2203685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Survey textbooks have a lot to accomplish. Providing students and practitioners with an overview of a field is a daunting task with many things for an author to consider. There the Victoria Harbor seemed to be the most pressing problems that the administration of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“government”) had to address. The years 2006–2007 represent a turning moment in the post-colonial history of built heritage protection, as the following chapter indicates. The decision of the government to demolish several built heritage sites caused public protest as well as unsuccessful litigation. After 2007, the seventh chapter suggests, Hong Kong’s built heritage policy underwent considerable change. The establishment of the New Antiquities Authority, the adoption of a new policy regarding heritage impact assessment as well as the implementation of a scheme for the revitalization of historic buildings were some of the most important initiatives. The eighth chapter operates as a bridge with the next and final chapter. It takes stock of the bright and dark sides of protecting built heritage in Hong Kong after 2007. In terms of successes, the growing consultation of public opinion concerning heritage-related matters is noticeable (77). By contrast, amongst the darker sides are the disputes about the inscription of certain heritage sites into the World Heritage List and the practical implementation of the heritage impact assessment scheme. Gallagher in the final chapter pushes for the reform of Hong Kong’s built heritage law and policy by listing specific recommendations. Gazing to the future, Gallagher, concludes with confidence about the long-term preservation of Hong Kong’s built heritage (111). From the perspective of the reviewers, Protecting Built Heritage in Hong Kong fills the lacuna of scholarly research into built heritage legislation and policy in Hong Kong by providing a comprehensive analysis. The book is constructive, enlightening, concise and easily accessible to the average reader. Consisting of 111 pages, the book can be read from cover to cover in a reasonably short amount of time. The book throws a net that is both broad and deep enough to appeal to both academics and a wider audience. The book is welcomed by legal scholars and students but also heritage professionals working in the field of cultural heritage and policy as well as to those who maintain an interest to learn more about Hong Kong’s rich built heritage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2023.2203685\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2023.2203685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查教科书还有很多工作要做。向学生和从业者提供一个领域的概述是一项艰巨的任务,作者需要考虑许多事情。在那里,维多利亚港似乎是香港特别行政区政府(“政府”)必须解决的最紧迫的问题。2006-2007年是后殖民时期建筑遗产保护历史上的一个转折点,如下章所述。政府拆除几处建筑遗址的决定引起了公众的抗议和失败的诉讼。第七章指出,2007年以后,香港的建筑遗产政策发生了相当大的变化。成立新古物事务监督、就文物影响评估采取新政策,以及推行活化历史建筑的计划,都是最重要的措施。第八章作为下一章和最后一章的桥梁。它盘点了2007年后香港保护建筑遗产的光明面和阴暗面。就成功而言,关于遗产相关问题的公众意见日益增多是值得注意的(77)。相比之下,在黑暗的一面是关于某些遗产列入《世界遗产名录》的争议和遗产影响评估方案的实际实施。加拉格尔在最后一章中提出了具体的建议,推动香港建筑遗产法律和政策的改革。展望未来,加拉格尔对香港建筑遗产的长远保存充满信心(111)。从审稿人的角度来看,《保护香港建筑遗产》提供了全面的分析,填补了对香港建筑遗产立法和政策的学术研究的空白。这本书是建设性的,启发性的,简洁易懂的普通读者。这本书共有111页,可以在相当短的时间内从头到尾读完。这本书撒下了一张既广泛又深入的网,足以吸引学术界和更广泛的读者。这本书不仅受到法律学者和学生的欢迎,也受到从事文化遗产和政策工作的文物专家,以及有兴趣进一步了解香港丰富建筑遗产的人士的欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing Arts Organizations
Survey textbooks have a lot to accomplish. Providing students and practitioners with an overview of a field is a daunting task with many things for an author to consider. There the Victoria Harbor seemed to be the most pressing problems that the administration of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“government”) had to address. The years 2006–2007 represent a turning moment in the post-colonial history of built heritage protection, as the following chapter indicates. The decision of the government to demolish several built heritage sites caused public protest as well as unsuccessful litigation. After 2007, the seventh chapter suggests, Hong Kong’s built heritage policy underwent considerable change. The establishment of the New Antiquities Authority, the adoption of a new policy regarding heritage impact assessment as well as the implementation of a scheme for the revitalization of historic buildings were some of the most important initiatives. The eighth chapter operates as a bridge with the next and final chapter. It takes stock of the bright and dark sides of protecting built heritage in Hong Kong after 2007. In terms of successes, the growing consultation of public opinion concerning heritage-related matters is noticeable (77). By contrast, amongst the darker sides are the disputes about the inscription of certain heritage sites into the World Heritage List and the practical implementation of the heritage impact assessment scheme. Gallagher in the final chapter pushes for the reform of Hong Kong’s built heritage law and policy by listing specific recommendations. Gazing to the future, Gallagher, concludes with confidence about the long-term preservation of Hong Kong’s built heritage (111). From the perspective of the reviewers, Protecting Built Heritage in Hong Kong fills the lacuna of scholarly research into built heritage legislation and policy in Hong Kong by providing a comprehensive analysis. The book is constructive, enlightening, concise and easily accessible to the average reader. Consisting of 111 pages, the book can be read from cover to cover in a reasonably short amount of time. The book throws a net that is both broad and deep enough to appeal to both academics and a wider audience. The book is welcomed by legal scholars and students but also heritage professionals working in the field of cultural heritage and policy as well as to those who maintain an interest to learn more about Hong Kong’s rich built heritage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: How will technology change the arts world? Who owns what in the information age? How will museums survive in the future? The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society has supplied answers to these kinds of questions for more than twenty-five years, becoming the authoritative resource for arts policymakers and analysts, sociologists, arts and cultural administrators, educators, trustees, artists, lawyers, and citizens concerned with the performing, visual, and media arts, as well as cultural affairs. Articles, commentaries, and reviews of publications address marketing, intellectual property, arts policy, arts law, governance, and cultural production and dissemination, always from a variety of philosophical, disciplinary, and national and international perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信