{"title":"海外骑行:关于头盔使用的决定","authors":"Jemma C King, R. Franklin, P. Leggat","doi":"10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cycling engagement in tourists is increasing; yet, bicycle helmet usage is not widely mandated internationally. Exploring hypothetical helmet use intentions when cycling in a foreign location for residents were the ability to decide in their home setting is removed presents a novel enquiry into the relationship between habit and tourist safety behaviour intentions.\n \nMethods: Queensland Social Survey (phone survey) of Queensland (Australia) residents (n=1,256) exploring current cycling participation, hypothetical cycling and helmet use whilst travelling overseas. Ethics approval was obtained. Backward logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the socio-economic and health characteristics that were significantly associated with hypothetical cycling and helmet use overseas.\n\nResults: One-third (39.6%) of respondents indicated they might cycle overseas and this was related to recent cycling engagement at home (p < 0.01). Helmet usage at home was related to hypothetical helmet use overseas (p < 0.01); with self-reported helmet use every time’ cycle a positive predictor of hypothetical helmet use overseas (OR=10.78; 95%CI=2.04-47.67). \n\nConclusions: Safety habits from a home setting, which likely exist due to legislation, might transfer to a foreign non-legislated settings. Promoting of safe cycling practices regardless of location has utility and warrants discussion within the disciplines of travel medicine and road safety. It is recommended before cycling overseas that individuals familiarise themselves with road rules, right of way, cycling infrastructure and the general conduct of other cyclists. Route planning will also likely be faciliated by this familiarisation and enable strategic sightseeing opportunities.","PeriodicalId":43503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cycling Overseas: Decisions regarding helmet use\",\"authors\":\"Jemma C King, R. Franklin, P. Leggat\",\"doi\":\"10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cycling engagement in tourists is increasing; yet, bicycle helmet usage is not widely mandated internationally. Exploring hypothetical helmet use intentions when cycling in a foreign location for residents were the ability to decide in their home setting is removed presents a novel enquiry into the relationship between habit and tourist safety behaviour intentions.\\n \\nMethods: Queensland Social Survey (phone survey) of Queensland (Australia) residents (n=1,256) exploring current cycling participation, hypothetical cycling and helmet use whilst travelling overseas. Ethics approval was obtained. Backward logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the socio-economic and health characteristics that were significantly associated with hypothetical cycling and helmet use overseas.\\n\\nResults: One-third (39.6%) of respondents indicated they might cycle overseas and this was related to recent cycling engagement at home (p < 0.01). Helmet usage at home was related to hypothetical helmet use overseas (p < 0.01); with self-reported helmet use every time’ cycle a positive predictor of hypothetical helmet use overseas (OR=10.78; 95%CI=2.04-47.67). \\n\\nConclusions: Safety habits from a home setting, which likely exist due to legislation, might transfer to a foreign non-legislated settings. Promoting of safe cycling practices regardless of location has utility and warrants discussion within the disciplines of travel medicine and road safety. It is recommended before cycling overseas that individuals familiarise themselves with road rules, right of way, cycling infrastructure and the general conduct of other cyclists. Route planning will also likely be faciliated by this familiarisation and enable strategic sightseeing opportunities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/JACRS-D-18-00295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:游客骑自行车的参与度越来越高;然而,自行车头盔的使用并没有在国际上得到广泛的强制执行。探索假设的头盔使用意图,当居民在国外地点骑自行车时,在他们的家庭环境中决定的能力被移除,提出了一个新的调查习惯和游客安全行为意图之间的关系。方法:昆士兰州(澳大利亚)居民(n=1,256)的昆士兰社会调查(电话调查),探讨当前的自行车参与,假设骑车和头盔使用在海外旅行。获得伦理批准。进行了逆向logistic回归分析,以确定与假设的海外骑车和头盔使用显著相关的社会经济和健康特征。结果:三分之一(39.6%)的受访者表示他们可能会在海外骑行,这与最近在国内骑行有关(p < 0.01)。国内头盔使用情况与国外头盔使用情况相关(p < 0.01);自我报告的每次头盔使用周期是假设头盔在海外使用的正向预测因子(OR=10.78;95% ci = 2.04 - -47.67)。结论:来自家庭环境的安全习惯,可能由于立法而存在,可能会转移到国外的非立法环境。无论地点如何,促进安全骑行实践具有实用性,值得在旅行医学和道路安全学科内进行讨论。单车人士在前往海外前,应先熟悉道路规则、路权、单车基础设施及其他单车人士的一般行为。通过这种熟悉,路线规划也可能得到便利,并提供战略性的观光机会。
Background: Cycling engagement in tourists is increasing; yet, bicycle helmet usage is not widely mandated internationally. Exploring hypothetical helmet use intentions when cycling in a foreign location for residents were the ability to decide in their home setting is removed presents a novel enquiry into the relationship between habit and tourist safety behaviour intentions.
Methods: Queensland Social Survey (phone survey) of Queensland (Australia) residents (n=1,256) exploring current cycling participation, hypothetical cycling and helmet use whilst travelling overseas. Ethics approval was obtained. Backward logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the socio-economic and health characteristics that were significantly associated with hypothetical cycling and helmet use overseas.
Results: One-third (39.6%) of respondents indicated they might cycle overseas and this was related to recent cycling engagement at home (p < 0.01). Helmet usage at home was related to hypothetical helmet use overseas (p < 0.01); with self-reported helmet use every time’ cycle a positive predictor of hypothetical helmet use overseas (OR=10.78; 95%CI=2.04-47.67).
Conclusions: Safety habits from a home setting, which likely exist due to legislation, might transfer to a foreign non-legislated settings. Promoting of safe cycling practices regardless of location has utility and warrants discussion within the disciplines of travel medicine and road safety. It is recommended before cycling overseas that individuals familiarise themselves with road rules, right of way, cycling infrastructure and the general conduct of other cyclists. Route planning will also likely be faciliated by this familiarisation and enable strategic sightseeing opportunities.