两种文化:科学中的统计学和机器学习

R. Kass
{"title":"两种文化:科学中的统计学和机器学习","authors":"R. Kass","doi":"10.1353/obs.2021.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his 2001 Statistical Science paper, Leo Breiman called attention to \"two cultures\" of data analysts, the first associated with computer science and the second with statistics. Breiman saw flaws in the traditionally-oriented statistical culture and advocated the predictively-oriented approach he identified with computer science. Although many of his observations were accurate and useful, Breiman failed to acknowledge the merits of statistical modeling, and he mischaracterized the role of statistics in science. To explain, I discuss machine learning and artificial intelligence; excessive cautiousness in statistics; dangers of statistical modeling; potential accomplishments of statistical modeling; the statistical paradigm; the nature of statistical models; and statistical methods that work well in practice. Everyone who is interested in the use of computer science and statistics in data analysis should grapple with the issues raised by Breiman's article.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Two Cultures: Statistics and Machine Learning in Science\",\"authors\":\"R. Kass\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/obs.2021.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In his 2001 Statistical Science paper, Leo Breiman called attention to \\\"two cultures\\\" of data analysts, the first associated with computer science and the second with statistics. Breiman saw flaws in the traditionally-oriented statistical culture and advocated the predictively-oriented approach he identified with computer science. Although many of his observations were accurate and useful, Breiman failed to acknowledge the merits of statistical modeling, and he mischaracterized the role of statistics in science. To explain, I discuss machine learning and artificial intelligence; excessive cautiousness in statistics; dangers of statistical modeling; potential accomplishments of statistical modeling; the statistical paradigm; the nature of statistical models; and statistical methods that work well in practice. Everyone who is interested in the use of computer science and statistics in data analysis should grapple with the issues raised by Breiman's article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observational studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observational studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:Leo Breiman在其2001年的《统计科学》论文中呼吁关注数据分析师的“两种文化”,第一种与计算机科学有关,第二种与统计学有关。Breiman看到了传统的统计文化中的缺陷,并提倡他在计算机科学中认同的预测导向方法。尽管他的许多观察都是准确和有用的,但Breiman没有承认统计建模的优点,他错误地描述了统计在科学中的作用。为了解释,我讨论了机器学习和人工智能;统计工作过于谨慎;统计建模的危险性;统计建模的潜在成就;统计范式;统计模型的性质;以及在实践中行之有效的统计方法。每个对计算机科学和统计学在数据分析中的应用感兴趣的人都应该努力解决Breiman文章中提出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Two Cultures: Statistics and Machine Learning in Science
Abstract:In his 2001 Statistical Science paper, Leo Breiman called attention to "two cultures" of data analysts, the first associated with computer science and the second with statistics. Breiman saw flaws in the traditionally-oriented statistical culture and advocated the predictively-oriented approach he identified with computer science. Although many of his observations were accurate and useful, Breiman failed to acknowledge the merits of statistical modeling, and he mischaracterized the role of statistics in science. To explain, I discuss machine learning and artificial intelligence; excessive cautiousness in statistics; dangers of statistical modeling; potential accomplishments of statistical modeling; the statistical paradigm; the nature of statistical models; and statistical methods that work well in practice. Everyone who is interested in the use of computer science and statistics in data analysis should grapple with the issues raised by Breiman's article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信