人类和非人类美洲印第安人集体民族志的最新方法论方法

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
Juan Javier Rivera Andía
{"title":"人类和非人类美洲印第安人集体民族志的最新方法论方法","authors":"Juan Javier Rivera Andía","doi":"10.1080/00938157.2019.1602324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract I examine recent ethnographic attempts to address alterity among Amerindian worlds—attempts that produce a critique of indigenous relationships with external or foreign agents. While some of them are concerned with describing what there is in those worlds, others illustrate different forms to approach it. The former studies carry out their descriptions through two contrasted types of fieldwork data: abstract indigenous concepts and material things. The latter studies are examined as illustrations of differentiated methodological advances: on the one hand, a writing experiment proposing an avant-garde engaged unruly ethnography; and on the other hand, what seems to be a mere accommodation of academic theoretical trends. The final picture of these current anthropological ethnographies depicts the contrasted contents and forms that are nowadays present in Amerindian studies.","PeriodicalId":43734,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Anthropology","volume":"48 1","pages":"38 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2019.1602324","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent methodological approaches in ethnographies of human and non-human Amerindian collectives\",\"authors\":\"Juan Javier Rivera Andía\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00938157.2019.1602324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract I examine recent ethnographic attempts to address alterity among Amerindian worlds—attempts that produce a critique of indigenous relationships with external or foreign agents. While some of them are concerned with describing what there is in those worlds, others illustrate different forms to approach it. The former studies carry out their descriptions through two contrasted types of fieldwork data: abstract indigenous concepts and material things. The latter studies are examined as illustrations of differentiated methodological advances: on the one hand, a writing experiment proposing an avant-garde engaged unruly ethnography; and on the other hand, what seems to be a mere accommodation of academic theoretical trends. The final picture of these current anthropological ethnographies depicts the contrasted contents and forms that are nowadays present in Amerindian studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2019.1602324\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2019.1602324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2019.1602324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要我研究了最近种族志试图解决美洲印第安人世界之间的矛盾——试图对土著人与外部或外国代理人的关系进行批判。虽然他们中的一些人关心描述这些世界中存在的东西,但另一些人则说明了不同的处理方式。以前的研究通过两种对比类型的实地调查数据进行描述:抽象的本土概念和物质。后一种研究被视为不同方法论进步的例证:一方面,一项写作实验提出了一种前卫的、不守规矩的民族志;另一方面,似乎只是对学术理论趋势的适应。这些当前人类学人种学的最后一幅图描绘了当今美洲印第安人研究中对比的内容和形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent methodological approaches in ethnographies of human and non-human Amerindian collectives
Abstract I examine recent ethnographic attempts to address alterity among Amerindian worlds—attempts that produce a critique of indigenous relationships with external or foreign agents. While some of them are concerned with describing what there is in those worlds, others illustrate different forms to approach it. The former studies carry out their descriptions through two contrasted types of fieldwork data: abstract indigenous concepts and material things. The latter studies are examined as illustrations of differentiated methodological advances: on the one hand, a writing experiment proposing an avant-garde engaged unruly ethnography; and on the other hand, what seems to be a mere accommodation of academic theoretical trends. The final picture of these current anthropological ethnographies depicts the contrasted contents and forms that are nowadays present in Amerindian studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Anthropology
Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信