跨文化的代理和来源可信度网格

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION

Journal of Asian Pacific Communication Pub Date : 2018-01-19 DOI:10.1075/JAPC.00005.DIL

Keith E. Dilbeck, Andrés S. Domínguez, J. Ruiz, M. Allen

{"title":"跨文化的代理和来源可信度网格","authors":"Keith E. Dilbeck, Andrés S. Domínguez, J. Ruiz, M. Allen","doi":"10.1075/JAPC.00005.DIL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The manuscript offers an expansion of a traditional view of source credibility based on evaluation of a message source with inclusion of vicarious credibility (evaluation by members of a social network). The move reflects the need to consider differing cultural perspectives on how a message source might become evaluated. Data from 1,149 participants (US, Spanish, Japanese) identify vicarious and source credibility as significantly different. Classification results from discriminant analysis, where vicarious and source become a single function to create new grounds for cross-cultural communication research. The new paradigm requires the examination of both vicarious credibility in conjunction with source credibility that produce a credibility grid.","PeriodicalId":43807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Pacific Communication","volume":"28 1","pages":"83-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The vicarious and source credibility grid acrosscultures\",\"authors\":\"Keith E. Dilbeck, Andrés S. Domínguez, J. Ruiz, M. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JAPC.00005.DIL\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The manuscript offers an expansion of a traditional view of source credibility based on evaluation of a message source with inclusion of vicarious credibility (evaluation by members of a social network). The move reflects the need to consider differing cultural perspectives on how a message source might become evaluated. Data from 1,149 participants (US, Spanish, Japanese) identify vicarious and source credibility as significantly different. Classification results from discriminant analysis, where vicarious and source become a single function to create new grounds for cross-cultural communication research. The new paradigm requires the examination of both vicarious credibility in conjunction with source credibility that produce a credibility grid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Pacific Communication\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"83-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Pacific Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JAPC.00005.DIL\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Pacific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JAPC.00005.DIL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

该手稿提供了一个传统的来源可信度观点的扩展，该观点基于对消息来源的评估，包括代理可信度(由社会网络成员进行的评估)。这一举措反映出，在如何评估消息来源时，需要考虑不同的文化视角。来自1149名参与者(美国、西班牙、日本)的数据表明，代理和来源可信度存在显著差异。分类是判别分析的结果，替代和来源成为一个单一的功能，为跨文化交际研究创造了新的基础。新范式要求将代理可信度与产生可信度网格的来源可信度结合起来进行检查。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The vicarious and source credibility grid acrosscultures

The manuscript offers an expansion of a traditional view of source credibility based on evaluation of a message source with inclusion of vicarious credibility (evaluation by members of a social network). The move reflects the need to consider differing cultural perspectives on how a message source might become evaluated. Data from 1,149 participants (US, Spanish, Japanese) identify vicarious and source credibility as significantly different. Classification results from discriminant analysis, where vicarious and source become a single function to create new grounds for cross-cultural communication research. The new paradigm requires the examination of both vicarious credibility in conjunction with source credibility that produce a credibility grid.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Asian Pacific Communication COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal’s academic orientation is generalist, passionately committed to interdisciplinary approaches to language and communication studies in the Asian Pacific. Thematic issues of previously published issues of JAPC include Cross-Cultural Communications: Literature, Language, Ideas; Sociolinguistics in China; Japan Communication Issues; Mass Media in the Asian Pacific; Comic Art in Asia, Historical Literacy, and Political Roots; Communication Gains through Student Exchanges & Study Abroad; Language Issues in Malaysia; English Language Development in East Asia; The Teachings of Writing in the Pacific Basin; Language and Identity in Asia; The Economics of Language in the Asian Pacific.