电影自我量表作为叙事认同的衡量标准的多方法验证

Alexander E Wong, Shrija Dirghangi
{"title":"电影自我量表作为叙事认同的衡量标准的多方法验证","authors":"Alexander E Wong, Shrija Dirghangi","doi":"10.1177/02762366231154188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to narrative identity people understand themselves through story. However, evidence suggests people vary dispositionally in how strongly they experience narrative identity. Recently, a self-report scale called the Cinematic Self scale was constructed and validated to measure this trait variation in narrative identity. In that article, evidence across five studies supported the validity of the cinematic self scale as measuring narrative identity. A limitation of that evidence was its exclusive reliance on self-reports; this can be problematic because associations may be inflated by shared method biases. The present research builds on that limitation by using data from multiple methods: self-reports and informant reports. Do self-reported cinematic self scores correspond with informant-reported narrative behaviors? University students (N = 127) completed the cinematic self scale and informants reported on their narrative behaviors (N = 395). Positive, medium-sized correlations between self-reports and informant reports were found across multiple analytical approaches, controlling for personality variables. The results extend validation evidence of the cinematic self scale as a measure of narrative identity.","PeriodicalId":89150,"journal":{"name":"Imagination, cognition and personality","volume":"42 1","pages":"333 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimethod Validation of the Cinematic Self Scale as a Measure of Narrative Identity by Convergent Self and Informant Ratings\",\"authors\":\"Alexander E Wong, Shrija Dirghangi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02762366231154188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to narrative identity people understand themselves through story. However, evidence suggests people vary dispositionally in how strongly they experience narrative identity. Recently, a self-report scale called the Cinematic Self scale was constructed and validated to measure this trait variation in narrative identity. In that article, evidence across five studies supported the validity of the cinematic self scale as measuring narrative identity. A limitation of that evidence was its exclusive reliance on self-reports; this can be problematic because associations may be inflated by shared method biases. The present research builds on that limitation by using data from multiple methods: self-reports and informant reports. Do self-reported cinematic self scores correspond with informant-reported narrative behaviors? University students (N = 127) completed the cinematic self scale and informants reported on their narrative behaviors (N = 395). Positive, medium-sized correlations between self-reports and informant reports were found across multiple analytical approaches, controlling for personality variables. The results extend validation evidence of the cinematic self scale as a measure of narrative identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"333 - 351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366231154188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagination, cognition and personality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366231154188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据叙事身份,人们通过故事来理解自己。然而,有证据表明,人们在体验叙事身份的强烈程度上有着不同的性格。最近,一种名为电影自我量表的自我报告量表被构建并验证,以衡量叙事身份的这种特质变化。在那篇文章中,五项研究的证据支持电影自我量表作为衡量叙事身份的有效性。这种证据的局限性在于它完全依赖自我报告;这可能是有问题的,因为共享的方法偏差可能会夸大关联。本研究通过使用多种方法的数据建立在这一限制的基础上:自我报告和线人报告。自我报告的电影自我评分与线人报告的叙事行为一致吗?大学生(N = 127)完成了电影自我量表,线人报告了他们的叙事行为(N = 395)。在控制人格变量的多种分析方法中,自我报告和举报人报告之间存在正的中等相关性。研究结果扩展了电影自我尺度作为叙事身份衡量标准的验证证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimethod Validation of the Cinematic Self Scale as a Measure of Narrative Identity by Convergent Self and Informant Ratings
According to narrative identity people understand themselves through story. However, evidence suggests people vary dispositionally in how strongly they experience narrative identity. Recently, a self-report scale called the Cinematic Self scale was constructed and validated to measure this trait variation in narrative identity. In that article, evidence across five studies supported the validity of the cinematic self scale as measuring narrative identity. A limitation of that evidence was its exclusive reliance on self-reports; this can be problematic because associations may be inflated by shared method biases. The present research builds on that limitation by using data from multiple methods: self-reports and informant reports. Do self-reported cinematic self scores correspond with informant-reported narrative behaviors? University students (N = 127) completed the cinematic self scale and informants reported on their narrative behaviors (N = 395). Positive, medium-sized correlations between self-reports and informant reports were found across multiple analytical approaches, controlling for personality variables. The results extend validation evidence of the cinematic self scale as a measure of narrative identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信