愤世嫉俗的心灵歌词:骗子就像抒情的主题

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC
Марк Липовецкий (Mark Lipovetsky)
{"title":"愤世嫉俗的心灵歌词:骗子就像抒情的主题","authors":"Марк Липовецкий (Mark Lipovetsky)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article discusses manifestations of the trickster’s subjectivity in the works of contemporary Russian poets. While linking the trickster’s position in culture with Peter Sloterdijk’s discussion on cynicism/kynicism, the article suggests a typology of contemporary lyrical subjects developing different aspects of the trickster tradition, such as the imposter (illustrated by Prigov’s poetry), <em>skomorokh</em> (reinvented by Shish Brianskii), “the people’s poet” (as in Vsevolod Emelin’s poetry), and a “reflexive kynic” (exemplified by Andrei Rodionov). In conclusion, the cultural function of contemporary Russian trickster-like lyrical poetry is discussed through the lens of Giorgio Agamben’s interpretation of profanations and Michel de Certeau’s concept of practical tactics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Лирика цинического разума: трикстер как лирический субъект\",\"authors\":\"Марк Липовецкий (Mark Lipovetsky)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The article discusses manifestations of the trickster’s subjectivity in the works of contemporary Russian poets. While linking the trickster’s position in culture with Peter Sloterdijk’s discussion on cynicism/kynicism, the article suggests a typology of contemporary lyrical subjects developing different aspects of the trickster tradition, such as the imposter (illustrated by Prigov’s poetry), <em>skomorokh</em> (reinvented by Shish Brianskii), “the people’s poet” (as in Vsevolod Emelin’s poetry), and a “reflexive kynic” (exemplified by Andrei Rodionov). In conclusion, the cultural function of contemporary Russian trickster-like lyrical poetry is discussed through the lens of Giorgio Agamben’s interpretation of profanations and Michel de Certeau’s concept of practical tactics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了骗子主体性在当代俄罗斯诗人作品中的表现。在将骗子在文化中的地位与彼得·斯洛特戴克关于犬儒主义/犬儒主义的讨论联系起来的同时,这篇文章提出了一种当代抒情主题的类型学,发展了骗子传统的不同方面,如冒名顶替者(普里戈夫的诗歌)、skomorokh(由希什·布里安斯基重新发明)、“人民的诗人”(如弗谢沃洛德·埃梅林的诗歌)和“反身的犬儒主义者”(安德烈·罗季奥诺夫的诗歌)。最后,通过阿甘本对亵渎的解读和米歇尔·德·塞托的实用策略概念来探讨当代俄罗斯骗子式抒情诗的文化功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Лирика цинического разума: трикстер как лирический субъект

The article discusses manifestations of the trickster’s subjectivity in the works of contemporary Russian poets. While linking the trickster’s position in culture with Peter Sloterdijk’s discussion on cynicism/kynicism, the article suggests a typology of contemporary lyrical subjects developing different aspects of the trickster tradition, such as the imposter (illustrated by Prigov’s poetry), skomorokh (reinvented by Shish Brianskii), “the people’s poet” (as in Vsevolod Emelin’s poetry), and a “reflexive kynic” (exemplified by Andrei Rodionov). In conclusion, the cultural function of contemporary Russian trickster-like lyrical poetry is discussed through the lens of Giorgio Agamben’s interpretation of profanations and Michel de Certeau’s concept of practical tactics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信