干旱和萨克拉门托-圣华金三角洲,2012-2016:环境审查和教训

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
J. Durand, F. Bombardelli, W. Fleenor, Y. Henneberry, J. Herman, C. Jeffres, M. Leinfelder-Miles, Robert A. Lusardi, Amber D. Manfree, Josué Medellín-Azura, Brett Milligan, P. Moyle, J. Lund
{"title":"干旱和萨克拉门托-圣华金三角洲,2012-2016:环境审查和教训","authors":"J. Durand, F. Bombardelli, W. Fleenor, Y. Henneberry, J. Herman, C. Jeffres, M. Leinfelder-Miles, Robert A. Lusardi, Amber D. Manfree, Josué Medellín-Azura, Brett Milligan, P. Moyle, J. Lund","doi":"10.15447/sfews.2020v18iss2art2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews environmental management and the use of science in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta during California’s 2012–2016 drought. The review is based on available reports and data, and guided by discussions with 27 agency staff, stake-holders, and researchers. Key management actions for the drought are discussed relative to four major drought water management priorities stated by water managers: support public health and safety, control saltwater intrusion, preserve cold water in Shasta Reservoir, and maintain minimum protections for endangered species. Despite some success in streamlining communication through interagency task forces, conflicting management mandates sometimes led to confusion about priorities and actions during the drought (i.e., water delivery, the environment, etc.). This report highlights several lessons and offers suggestions to improve management for future droughts. Recommendations include use of pre-drought warnings, timely drought declarations, improved transparency and useful documentation, better scientific preparation, development of a Delta drought management plan (including preparing for salinity barriers), and improved water accounting. Finally, better environmental outcomes occur when resources are applied to improving habitat and bolstering populations of native species during inter-drought periods, well before stressful conditions occur.","PeriodicalId":38364,"journal":{"name":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15447/sfews.2020v18iss2art2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drought and the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, 2012–2016: Environmental Review and Lessons\",\"authors\":\"J. Durand, F. Bombardelli, W. Fleenor, Y. Henneberry, J. Herman, C. Jeffres, M. Leinfelder-Miles, Robert A. Lusardi, Amber D. Manfree, Josué Medellín-Azura, Brett Milligan, P. Moyle, J. Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.15447/sfews.2020v18iss2art2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reviews environmental management and the use of science in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta during California’s 2012–2016 drought. The review is based on available reports and data, and guided by discussions with 27 agency staff, stake-holders, and researchers. Key management actions for the drought are discussed relative to four major drought water management priorities stated by water managers: support public health and safety, control saltwater intrusion, preserve cold water in Shasta Reservoir, and maintain minimum protections for endangered species. Despite some success in streamlining communication through interagency task forces, conflicting management mandates sometimes led to confusion about priorities and actions during the drought (i.e., water delivery, the environment, etc.). This report highlights several lessons and offers suggestions to improve management for future droughts. Recommendations include use of pre-drought warnings, timely drought declarations, improved transparency and useful documentation, better scientific preparation, development of a Delta drought management plan (including preparing for salinity barriers), and improved water accounting. Finally, better environmental outcomes occur when resources are applied to improving habitat and bolstering populations of native species during inter-drought periods, well before stressful conditions occur.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15447/sfews.2020v18iss2art2\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2020v18iss2art2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2020v18iss2art2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文回顾了加州2012-2016年干旱期间萨克拉门托-圣华金三角洲的环境管理和科学应用。审查以现有报告和数据为基础,并以与27名机构工作人员、利益攸关方和研究人员的讨论为指导。根据水资源管理者提出的四个主要干旱水管理优先事项,讨论了应对干旱的关键管理行动:支持公众健康和安全、控制盐水入侵、保护沙斯塔水库的冷水以及维持对濒危物种的最低限度保护。尽管在通过机构间工作队简化沟通方面取得了一些成功,但相互冲突的管理任务有时导致对干旱期间的优先事项和行动(即供水、环境等)的混淆。本报告强调了一些经验教训,并提出了改善未来干旱管理的建议。建议包括使用干旱前预警、及时宣布干旱、提高透明度和有用的文件、更好的科学准备、制定三角洲干旱管理计划(包括准备盐度屏障)和改进水资源核算。最后,在干旱期间,在压力条件发生之前,将资源用于改善栖息地和增加本地物种的数量,就会产生更好的环境结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drought and the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, 2012–2016: Environmental Review and Lessons
This paper reviews environmental management and the use of science in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta during California’s 2012–2016 drought. The review is based on available reports and data, and guided by discussions with 27 agency staff, stake-holders, and researchers. Key management actions for the drought are discussed relative to four major drought water management priorities stated by water managers: support public health and safety, control saltwater intrusion, preserve cold water in Shasta Reservoir, and maintain minimum protections for endangered species. Despite some success in streamlining communication through interagency task forces, conflicting management mandates sometimes led to confusion about priorities and actions during the drought (i.e., water delivery, the environment, etc.). This report highlights several lessons and offers suggestions to improve management for future droughts. Recommendations include use of pre-drought warnings, timely drought declarations, improved transparency and useful documentation, better scientific preparation, development of a Delta drought management plan (including preparing for salinity barriers), and improved water accounting. Finally, better environmental outcomes occur when resources are applied to improving habitat and bolstering populations of native species during inter-drought periods, well before stressful conditions occur.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信