投资于社区权力建设,通过投票增加公民参与:建设健康社区倡议的经验教训

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Monique Gill, Ben Gronowski, Elliott G. Moon, Claire Devine, Megan Holtorf, Bill Wright
{"title":"投资于社区权力建设,通过投票增加公民参与:建设健康社区倡议的经验教训","authors":"Monique Gill, Ben Gronowski, Elliott G. Moon, Claire Devine, Megan Holtorf, Bill Wright","doi":"10.1080/10705422.2023.2217160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to examine the impact of investments in community organizing made as part of a 10-year comprehensive community initiative focused on community power building in California. Data from multiple sources were used to examine the relationship between investments and one measure of civic engagement, voter turnout. Comparisons were made over time (2010–2019) and between intervention and propensity-weighted comparison sites. Analyses determined that investments by the funder were positively associated with turnout; this effect differed across elections and was largest in 2012. Broad investments to support community engagement, organizing, and base building had a positive impact on voting, an important indicator of civic engagement. In historically marginalized or underserved communities, investing in power building can yield benefits despite structural barriers that result in inequities. As restrictive electoral reforms grow across the country in the wake of the 2020 election, initiatives designed to build power may support proactively organizing against these changes or provide the infrastructure to understand and navigate them. Investing in community power building is a promising strategy for philanthropic organizations, organizers, and policy makers.","PeriodicalId":46385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"174 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investing in community power building to increase civic engagement through voting: lessons from the Building Healthy Communities initiative\",\"authors\":\"Monique Gill, Ben Gronowski, Elliott G. Moon, Claire Devine, Megan Holtorf, Bill Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10705422.2023.2217160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to examine the impact of investments in community organizing made as part of a 10-year comprehensive community initiative focused on community power building in California. Data from multiple sources were used to examine the relationship between investments and one measure of civic engagement, voter turnout. Comparisons were made over time (2010–2019) and between intervention and propensity-weighted comparison sites. Analyses determined that investments by the funder were positively associated with turnout; this effect differed across elections and was largest in 2012. Broad investments to support community engagement, organizing, and base building had a positive impact on voting, an important indicator of civic engagement. In historically marginalized or underserved communities, investing in power building can yield benefits despite structural barriers that result in inequities. As restrictive electoral reforms grow across the country in the wake of the 2020 election, initiatives designed to build power may support proactively organizing against these changes or provide the infrastructure to understand and navigate them. Investing in community power building is a promising strategy for philanthropic organizations, organizers, and policy makers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"174 - 192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2023.2217160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2023.2217160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本研究的目的是考察社区组织投资的影响,这是加州一项为期10年的社区综合倡议的一部分,重点是社区权力建设。来自多个来源的数据被用来检验投资与公民参与的一个衡量标准——选民投票率之间的关系。在一段时间内(2010-2019年)进行比较,并在干预和倾向加权比较地点之间进行比较。分析表明,资助者的投资与投票率呈正相关;这种影响在不同的选举中有所不同,在2012年最为明显。支持社区参与、组织和基础建设的广泛投资对投票产生了积极影响,投票是公民参与的一个重要指标。在历史上被边缘化或服务不足的社区,尽管存在导致不平等的结构性障碍,但投资于电力建设可以产生效益。在2020年大选之后,随着限制性选举改革在全国范围内的发展,旨在建立权力的举措可能会支持积极组织反对这些变化,或者提供理解和驾驭这些变化的基础设施。对慈善组织、组织者和政策制定者来说,投资社区力量建设是一个很有前途的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investing in community power building to increase civic engagement through voting: lessons from the Building Healthy Communities initiative
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to examine the impact of investments in community organizing made as part of a 10-year comprehensive community initiative focused on community power building in California. Data from multiple sources were used to examine the relationship between investments and one measure of civic engagement, voter turnout. Comparisons were made over time (2010–2019) and between intervention and propensity-weighted comparison sites. Analyses determined that investments by the funder were positively associated with turnout; this effect differed across elections and was largest in 2012. Broad investments to support community engagement, organizing, and base building had a positive impact on voting, an important indicator of civic engagement. In historically marginalized or underserved communities, investing in power building can yield benefits despite structural barriers that result in inequities. As restrictive electoral reforms grow across the country in the wake of the 2020 election, initiatives designed to build power may support proactively organizing against these changes or provide the infrastructure to understand and navigate them. Investing in community power building is a promising strategy for philanthropic organizations, organizers, and policy makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Practice is an interdisciplinary journal grounded in social work. It is designed to provide a forum for community practice, including community organizing, planning, social administration, organizational development, community development, and social change. The journal contributes to the advancement of knowledge related to numerous disciplines, including social work and the social sciences, urban planning, social and economic development, community organizing, policy analysis, urban and rural sociology, community health, public administration, and nonprofit management. As a forum for authors and a resource for readers, this journal makes an invaluable contribution to the community"s conceptualization, applications, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信