宪法法院在考虑开放政策方面的重复性重建

M. A. Fauzani, Fandi Nur Rohman
{"title":"宪法法院在考虑开放政策方面的重复性重建","authors":"M. A. Fauzani, Fandi Nur Rohman","doi":"10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to \"open legal policy\"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to\"open legal policy\"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of \"political question\"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY)\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Fauzani, Fandi Nur Rohman\",\"doi\":\"10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to \\\"open legal policy\\\"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to\\\"open legal policy\\\"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of \\\"political question\\\"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justitia Et Pax\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justitia Et Pax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justitia Et Pax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究有两个问题提法,一是宪法法院的建设如何兼顾“开放的法律政策”;第二,宪法法院在考虑“开放的法律政策”方面重建的紧迫性是什么?本研究采用法律和概念方法进行规范性司法研究。这项研究的结果是:首先,宪法法院在确定公开法律政策考虑的基准方面缺乏明确性和一致性。第二,提出了新的概念:(1)运用“政治问题”学说;b) 宪法法院仍在测试基于正式和实质性要求的规范。给出的建议是,宪法法院应根据本研究中提议的重建采取立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY)
This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to "open legal policy"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to"open legal policy"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of "political question"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信