共识建议:微生物伤口诊断的适应症和方法

Q1 Medicine
Axel Kramer , Ojan Assadian , Jürgen Bohnert , Georg Daeschlein , Joachim Dissemond , Veronika Gerber , Peter Hinz , Adam Junka , Simon Kim , Roald Papke , Christian Willy
{"title":"共识建议:微生物伤口诊断的适应症和方法","authors":"Axel Kramer ,&nbsp;Ojan Assadian ,&nbsp;Jürgen Bohnert ,&nbsp;Georg Daeschlein ,&nbsp;Joachim Dissemond ,&nbsp;Veronika Gerber ,&nbsp;Peter Hinz ,&nbsp;Adam Junka ,&nbsp;Simon Kim ,&nbsp;Roald Papke ,&nbsp;Christian Willy","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2018.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe the indication and technique of microbiological wound investigation in treating infected or colonised wounds with or without multi-drug resistant microorganisms (MDROs). The clinical symptoms and criteria of locally or systemically infected wounds are summarized and described.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An interdisciplinary consensus of microbiological wound diagnosis was elaborated between representatives of different medical specialities. Moreover, some perspectives on future wound diagnostics were presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The panel agreed on ten clinical signs, situations and symptoms, which give the indication for further microbiological wound investigation: formation of pus, clinical signs or suspicion of an infection, suspicion or presence of a surgical site infection<span>, localised progredient infection with or without systemic involvement (e.g. joint empyema, phlegmone), gangrene formation and </span></span>necrotising fasciitis<span><span>, ulcerative neoplasia, burn wounds with &gt; 15% thermally injured surface area, exacerbation of dermatological disorders, localised wound infection without sign of systemic involvement after 3 days treatment with antiseptics without obvious clinical improvement, and chronic </span>skin lesion with indication to screen for MDROs.</span></p><p>The panel agreed that no indication for microbiological investigation is given in acute wounds without signs of infection and uncomplicated superficial wounds.</p><p><span>Today, the gold standard for microbiological investigation is processing tissue biopsies in the laboratory. However, in many instances it may be easier and more rapid to perform a wound swab. If swabs are obtained, the Essener circle or the Levine technique shall be applied. Wound swabs, however, are the method of choice in screening for wound colonisation with MDROs. Additionally, information is summarised pertaining to transport and processing of microbiological wound specimens Also, potential applicability of future wound diagnostic methods based on genomic, </span>metabolomic<span> and proteomic approach are discussed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Beside a full understanding of all clinical symptoms and clinical experience of wound experts the correct microbiological wound investigation will be the basis for a succesfull management of infected wounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 53-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2018.10.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus recommendation: Indications and methods for microbiological wound diagnostics\",\"authors\":\"Axel Kramer ,&nbsp;Ojan Assadian ,&nbsp;Jürgen Bohnert ,&nbsp;Georg Daeschlein ,&nbsp;Joachim Dissemond ,&nbsp;Veronika Gerber ,&nbsp;Peter Hinz ,&nbsp;Adam Junka ,&nbsp;Simon Kim ,&nbsp;Roald Papke ,&nbsp;Christian Willy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wndm.2018.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe the indication and technique of microbiological wound investigation in treating infected or colonised wounds with or without multi-drug resistant microorganisms (MDROs). The clinical symptoms and criteria of locally or systemically infected wounds are summarized and described.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An interdisciplinary consensus of microbiological wound diagnosis was elaborated between representatives of different medical specialities. Moreover, some perspectives on future wound diagnostics were presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The panel agreed on ten clinical signs, situations and symptoms, which give the indication for further microbiological wound investigation: formation of pus, clinical signs or suspicion of an infection, suspicion or presence of a surgical site infection<span>, localised progredient infection with or without systemic involvement (e.g. joint empyema, phlegmone), gangrene formation and </span></span>necrotising fasciitis<span><span>, ulcerative neoplasia, burn wounds with &gt; 15% thermally injured surface area, exacerbation of dermatological disorders, localised wound infection without sign of systemic involvement after 3 days treatment with antiseptics without obvious clinical improvement, and chronic </span>skin lesion with indication to screen for MDROs.</span></p><p>The panel agreed that no indication for microbiological investigation is given in acute wounds without signs of infection and uncomplicated superficial wounds.</p><p><span>Today, the gold standard for microbiological investigation is processing tissue biopsies in the laboratory. However, in many instances it may be easier and more rapid to perform a wound swab. If swabs are obtained, the Essener circle or the Levine technique shall be applied. Wound swabs, however, are the method of choice in screening for wound colonisation with MDROs. Additionally, information is summarised pertaining to transport and processing of microbiological wound specimens Also, potential applicability of future wound diagnostic methods based on genomic, </span>metabolomic<span> and proteomic approach are discussed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Beside a full understanding of all clinical symptoms and clinical experience of wound experts the correct microbiological wound investigation will be the basis for a succesfull management of infected wounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 53-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2018.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909518300569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909518300569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨伤口微生物调查在治疗有或无多重耐药微生物(MDROs)感染或定植伤口中的指征和技术。总结和描述了局部或全身伤口感染的临床症状和标准。方法阐述不同医学专科代表对微生物性伤口诊断的跨学科共识。此外,对未来的伤口诊断提出了一些展望。结果专家组就10种临床体征、情况和症状达成一致,这些临床体征、情况和症状给出了进一步微生物伤口调查的指征:脓的形成、临床体征或怀疑感染、怀疑或存在手术部位感染、局部进行性感染伴或不伴全身性感染(如关节脓肿、痰)、坏疽形成和坏死性筋膜炎、溃疡性瘤变、烧伤创面伴;15%的表面热损伤,皮肤疾病加重,局部伤口感染,经抗菌药物治疗3天后无明显临床改善,无全身性征象,慢性皮肤病变,需筛查mdro。专家组一致认为,没有感染迹象的急性伤口和无并发症的浅表伤口不需要进行微生物学调查。今天,微生物研究的金标准是在实验室进行组织活检。然而,在许多情况下,使用伤口拭子可能更容易、更快速。如果获得拭子,应使用Essener圈或Levine技术。然而,伤口拭子是筛选伤口定殖mdro的首选方法。此外,总结了与微生物伤口标本的运输和处理有关的信息,并讨论了基于基因组学、代谢组学和蛋白质组学方法的未来伤口诊断方法的潜在适用性。结论除了充分了解所有临床症状和伤口专家的临床经验外,正确的伤口微生物调查将是成功处理感染伤口的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus recommendation: Indications and methods for microbiological wound diagnostics

Aim

To describe the indication and technique of microbiological wound investigation in treating infected or colonised wounds with or without multi-drug resistant microorganisms (MDROs). The clinical symptoms and criteria of locally or systemically infected wounds are summarized and described.

Method

An interdisciplinary consensus of microbiological wound diagnosis was elaborated between representatives of different medical specialities. Moreover, some perspectives on future wound diagnostics were presented.

Results

The panel agreed on ten clinical signs, situations and symptoms, which give the indication for further microbiological wound investigation: formation of pus, clinical signs or suspicion of an infection, suspicion or presence of a surgical site infection, localised progredient infection with or without systemic involvement (e.g. joint empyema, phlegmone), gangrene formation and necrotising fasciitis, ulcerative neoplasia, burn wounds with > 15% thermally injured surface area, exacerbation of dermatological disorders, localised wound infection without sign of systemic involvement after 3 days treatment with antiseptics without obvious clinical improvement, and chronic skin lesion with indication to screen for MDROs.

The panel agreed that no indication for microbiological investigation is given in acute wounds without signs of infection and uncomplicated superficial wounds.

Today, the gold standard for microbiological investigation is processing tissue biopsies in the laboratory. However, in many instances it may be easier and more rapid to perform a wound swab. If swabs are obtained, the Essener circle or the Levine technique shall be applied. Wound swabs, however, are the method of choice in screening for wound colonisation with MDROs. Additionally, information is summarised pertaining to transport and processing of microbiological wound specimens Also, potential applicability of future wound diagnostic methods based on genomic, metabolomic and proteomic approach are discussed.

Conclusion

Beside a full understanding of all clinical symptoms and clinical experience of wound experts the correct microbiological wound investigation will be the basis for a succesfull management of infected wounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信