“Cum cura exploratis”(Liv。二十二，12,2):公元前3世纪罗马的军事情报。

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY

Studia Historica-Historia Antigua Pub Date : 2020-10-07 DOI:10.14201/shha2020384977

Pau Valdés Matías

{"title":"“Cum cura exploratis”(Liv。二十二，12,2):公元前3世纪罗马的军事情报。","authors":"Pau Valdés Matías","doi":"10.14201/shha2020384977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The defeats suffered in the initial years of the Second Punic War have led to consider that Rome did not have a sufficiently developed military intelligence. However, a review of the classic authors reveals the problems posed by this conception. Through an analysis of written evidence we propose a new interpretation of Roman military intelligence during the third century B.C.","PeriodicalId":40819,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cum cura exploratis (Liv. XXII, 12,2): inteligencia militar en roma durante el siglo III a. C.\",\"authors\":\"Pau Valdés Matías\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/shha2020384977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The defeats suffered in the initial years of the Second Punic War have led to consider that Rome did not have a sufficiently developed military intelligence. However, a review of the classic authors reveals the problems posed by this conception. Through an analysis of written evidence we propose a new interpretation of Roman military intelligence during the third century B.C.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/shha2020384977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/shha2020384977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

第二次布匿战争初期的失败导致人们认为罗马没有足够发达的军事情报。然而，对经典作者的回顾揭示了这种观念所带来的问题。通过对书面证据的分析，我们对公元前三世纪的罗马军事情报提出了一种新的解释

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cum cura exploratis (Liv. XXII, 12,2): inteligencia militar en roma durante el siglo III a. C.

The defeats suffered in the initial years of the Second Punic War have led to consider that Rome did not have a sufficiently developed military intelligence. However, a review of the classic authors reveals the problems posed by this conception. Through an analysis of written evidence we propose a new interpretation of Roman military intelligence during the third century B.C.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studia Historica-Historia Antigua HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： STUDIA HISTORICA: HISTORIA ANTIGUA is an annual journal in which the articles received will be evaluated by reviewers external to the journal through the double blind system. The Editorial Board, respectful of the intellectual freedom of the authors, will not modify the opinions and expressed by them, although it does not sympathize with them either. The Editorial Board of STUDIA HISTORICA: HISTORIA ANTIGUA will consider the publication of works of all kinds, provided that they demonstrate a high level of quality and deal with aspects related to the chronological period included within the scope of Ancient History, either because of the novelty of the subject, because of the different treatment more deep of a problem already identified in historiography, by the contribution of unknown data in relation to a determined historiographic question, or by the potential applications of a new or more refined methodology.