学生团队学习模式

Q1 Nursing
Jerome I. Rotgans, Preman Rajalingam, Michael A. Ferenczi, Naomi Low-Beer
{"title":"学生团队学习模式","authors":"Jerome I. Rotgans,&nbsp;Preman Rajalingam,&nbsp;Michael A. Ferenczi,&nbsp;Naomi Low-Beer","doi":"10.1016/j.hpe.2018.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Team-based learning (TBL) combines direct instruction with active, collaborative small group learning. This study aimed to elucidate-from the students’ perspective-the relations between different elements of TBL. This is expected to provide a better understanding of the inner workings of TBL in education.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three hundred and thirteen first- and second-year medical students participated in the study. Data about TBL were collected at the end of six teaching blocks, by means of a questionnaire. The data were then combined and subjected to path analysis, which enabled testing of hypothesised relations between three layers of TBL-relevant variables. These were (1) input variables: prior knowledge, teamwork, challenging application exercise, content expert and facilitator; (2) process variables: preparation materials, individual readiness assurance test (iRAT), team readiness assurance test (tRAT); and (3) output variables: learning and topic interest.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Initial analysis resulted in amendments to the hypothesised model. An amended model fitted the data well and explained 43% of the variance in learning and 32% of the variance in topic interest. Content expert had a direct effect on topic interest, as did prior knowledge, teamwork, iRAT and application exercise. Learning was directly influenced by tRAT, application exercise and facilitator, but not content expert.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study demonstrate the inter-relationships of different elements of TBL. The results provide new insights in how TBL works from a students’ perspective. Implications of these findings are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93562,"journal":{"name":"Health professions education","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 294-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.10.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Students’ Model of Team-based Learning\",\"authors\":\"Jerome I. Rotgans,&nbsp;Preman Rajalingam,&nbsp;Michael A. Ferenczi,&nbsp;Naomi Low-Beer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpe.2018.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Team-based learning (TBL) combines direct instruction with active, collaborative small group learning. This study aimed to elucidate-from the students’ perspective-the relations between different elements of TBL. This is expected to provide a better understanding of the inner workings of TBL in education.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three hundred and thirteen first- and second-year medical students participated in the study. Data about TBL were collected at the end of six teaching blocks, by means of a questionnaire. The data were then combined and subjected to path analysis, which enabled testing of hypothesised relations between three layers of TBL-relevant variables. These were (1) input variables: prior knowledge, teamwork, challenging application exercise, content expert and facilitator; (2) process variables: preparation materials, individual readiness assurance test (iRAT), team readiness assurance test (tRAT); and (3) output variables: learning and topic interest.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Initial analysis resulted in amendments to the hypothesised model. An amended model fitted the data well and explained 43% of the variance in learning and 32% of the variance in topic interest. Content expert had a direct effect on topic interest, as did prior knowledge, teamwork, iRAT and application exercise. Learning was directly influenced by tRAT, application exercise and facilitator, but not content expert.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study demonstrate the inter-relationships of different elements of TBL. The results provide new insights in how TBL works from a students’ perspective. Implications of these findings are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health professions education\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 294-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.10.003\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health professions education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301118301706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health professions education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301118301706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

基于团队的学习(TBL)结合了直接教学和积极合作的小组学习。本研究旨在从学生的角度阐明任务型语言中各要素之间的关系。这将有助于更好地理解教学中TBL的内部工作原理。方法以医一、二年级学生313人为研究对象。在六个教学单元结束时,采用问卷调查的方式收集有关TBL的数据。然后将数据合并并进行通径分析,从而可以测试三层tbl相关变量之间的假设关系。这些是(1)输入变量:先验知识、团队合作、具有挑战性的应用练习、内容专家和促进者;(2)过程变量:准备材料、个人准备就绪保证测试(iRAT)、团队准备就绪保证测试(tRAT);(3)输出变量:学习和话题兴趣。结果初步分析对假设模型进行了修正。修正后的模型很好地拟合了数据,并解释了43%的学习方差和32%的话题兴趣方差。内容专家对主题兴趣有直接影响,先验知识、团队合作、iRAT和应用练习也有直接影响。tRAT、应用练习和引导者对学习有直接影响,而内容专家对学习没有直接影响。结论本研究结果揭示了TBL各因素之间的相互关系。研究结果从学生的角度为TBL的运作提供了新的见解。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Students’ Model of Team-based Learning

Background

Team-based learning (TBL) combines direct instruction with active, collaborative small group learning. This study aimed to elucidate-from the students’ perspective-the relations between different elements of TBL. This is expected to provide a better understanding of the inner workings of TBL in education.

Method

Three hundred and thirteen first- and second-year medical students participated in the study. Data about TBL were collected at the end of six teaching blocks, by means of a questionnaire. The data were then combined and subjected to path analysis, which enabled testing of hypothesised relations between three layers of TBL-relevant variables. These were (1) input variables: prior knowledge, teamwork, challenging application exercise, content expert and facilitator; (2) process variables: preparation materials, individual readiness assurance test (iRAT), team readiness assurance test (tRAT); and (3) output variables: learning and topic interest.

Results

Initial analysis resulted in amendments to the hypothesised model. An amended model fitted the data well and explained 43% of the variance in learning and 32% of the variance in topic interest. Content expert had a direct effect on topic interest, as did prior knowledge, teamwork, iRAT and application exercise. Learning was directly influenced by tRAT, application exercise and facilitator, but not content expert.

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate the inter-relationships of different elements of TBL. The results provide new insights in how TBL works from a students’ perspective. Implications of these findings are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信