文化的技术奇异性;

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
{"title":"文化的技术奇异性;","authors":"","doi":"10.22503/inftars.xxii.2022.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of technological singularity is very popular in both science and culture. However, in this paper I will argue that this concept is not sound; there is a severe contradiction in the mainstream Turingian approach because it neglects our evolutionary origin, which machines utterly lack, and this lets the so popular rise of the creatures concept into science—which, in fact, is just the new version of our most fundamental origin-story, the rebellion of Adam and Eve against God. However, we are, in reality, the children of evolution and machines are not, which makes a significant difference.","PeriodicalId":41114,"journal":{"name":"Informacios Tarsadalom","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technological singularity by culture;\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.22503/inftars.xxii.2022.4.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of technological singularity is very popular in both science and culture. However, in this paper I will argue that this concept is not sound; there is a severe contradiction in the mainstream Turingian approach because it neglects our evolutionary origin, which machines utterly lack, and this lets the so popular rise of the creatures concept into science—which, in fact, is just the new version of our most fundamental origin-story, the rebellion of Adam and Eve against God. However, we are, in reality, the children of evolution and machines are not, which makes a significant difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxii.2022.4.7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacios Tarsadalom","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxii.2022.4.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术奇点的概念在科学和文化中都很流行。然而,在本文中,我认为这一概念并不健全;主流的图林吉方法存在着严重的矛盾,因为它忽略了我们的进化起源,而机器完全缺乏进化起源,这让如此流行的生物概念进入了科学——事实上,这只是我们最基本的起源故事的新版本,亚当和夏娃对上帝的反叛。然而,在现实中,我们是进化的孩子,而机器不是,这就产生了显著的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technological singularity by culture;
The concept of technological singularity is very popular in both science and culture. However, in this paper I will argue that this concept is not sound; there is a severe contradiction in the mainstream Turingian approach because it neglects our evolutionary origin, which machines utterly lack, and this lets the so popular rise of the creatures concept into science—which, in fact, is just the new version of our most fundamental origin-story, the rebellion of Adam and Eve against God. However, we are, in reality, the children of evolution and machines are not, which makes a significant difference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informacios Tarsadalom
Informacios Tarsadalom INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信