{"title":"鲁宾和罗森鲍姆1983年关于倾向得分的开创性论文:从那时到现在","authors":"Usha Govindarajulu","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Rubin and Rosenbaum (1983) wrote about the theory and application of “propensity scores” in their landmark paper. Since that time, the method has still been in use or adapted for use in various contexts. In this commentary, I discuss their original paper and the latest in terms of criticisms and defense of the use of some of the theory they proposed for propensity score matching. Although the commentary is not exhaustive, I try to highlight important aspects of their theory as well as points made later for and against some of their originally proposed theory.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on Rubin and Rosenbaum Seminal 1983 Paper on Propensity Scores: From Then to Now\",\"authors\":\"Usha Govindarajulu\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/obs.2023.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Rubin and Rosenbaum (1983) wrote about the theory and application of “propensity scores” in their landmark paper. Since that time, the method has still been in use or adapted for use in various contexts. In this commentary, I discuss their original paper and the latest in terms of criticisms and defense of the use of some of the theory they proposed for propensity score matching. Although the commentary is not exhaustive, I try to highlight important aspects of their theory as well as points made later for and against some of their originally proposed theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observational studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observational studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Commentary on Rubin and Rosenbaum Seminal 1983 Paper on Propensity Scores: From Then to Now
Abstract:Rubin and Rosenbaum (1983) wrote about the theory and application of “propensity scores” in their landmark paper. Since that time, the method has still been in use or adapted for use in various contexts. In this commentary, I discuss their original paper and the latest in terms of criticisms and defense of the use of some of the theory they proposed for propensity score matching. Although the commentary is not exhaustive, I try to highlight important aspects of their theory as well as points made later for and against some of their originally proposed theory.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
