两种运动方法对老年人慢性腰痛的相对疗效:一项初步随机对照研究

Q1 Social Sciences
Eric Salas, Ryan Hulla, Nikeis Vanzzini, Cynthia Trowbridge, Marco Brotto, David Keller, Robert J. Gatchel
{"title":"两种运动方法对老年人慢性腰痛的相对疗效:一项初步随机对照研究","authors":"Eric Salas,&nbsp;Ryan Hulla,&nbsp;Nikeis Vanzzini,&nbsp;Cynthia Trowbridge,&nbsp;Marco Brotto,&nbsp;David Keller,&nbsp;Robert J. Gatchel","doi":"10.1111/jabr.12132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of the current study was to examine the relative efficacy of two exercise techniques—a multidimensional treatment (MDT) and a traditional senior exercise therapy treatment (TET)—in older adults diagnosed with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Participants (<i>N</i> = 16) were randomly assigned to either the MDT (<i>n</i> = 8) or TET (<i>n</i> = 8) groups after meeting the requirements for the presence of CLBP. Participants in the MDT group received an individualized exercise program, while participants in the TET participated in a group exercise program. A Mann–Whitney test was conducted to determine differences between psychosocial and physical variables pre- and post-intervention. Statistical analyses indicated no significant differences in physical or psychosocial variables at pre-intervention assessment. However, participants in the MDT group reported a decrease in fatigue and pain interference, with an increase in physical functioning, when compared to the TET group. Additionally, the MDT group displayed a significant decrease pain interference, while the TET group had an increase grip strength. Patients who received the MDT reported less fatigue and pain interference, and an increase in their overall physical functioning. Overall, the MDT was a more efficacious method to manage CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":45868,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jabr.12132","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relative efficacy of two exercise methods for older adults with chronic low back pain: A preliminary randomized control study\",\"authors\":\"Eric Salas,&nbsp;Ryan Hulla,&nbsp;Nikeis Vanzzini,&nbsp;Cynthia Trowbridge,&nbsp;Marco Brotto,&nbsp;David Keller,&nbsp;Robert J. Gatchel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jabr.12132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of the current study was to examine the relative efficacy of two exercise techniques—a multidimensional treatment (MDT) and a traditional senior exercise therapy treatment (TET)—in older adults diagnosed with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Participants (<i>N</i> = 16) were randomly assigned to either the MDT (<i>n</i> = 8) or TET (<i>n</i> = 8) groups after meeting the requirements for the presence of CLBP. Participants in the MDT group received an individualized exercise program, while participants in the TET participated in a group exercise program. A Mann–Whitney test was conducted to determine differences between psychosocial and physical variables pre- and post-intervention. Statistical analyses indicated no significant differences in physical or psychosocial variables at pre-intervention assessment. However, participants in the MDT group reported a decrease in fatigue and pain interference, with an increase in physical functioning, when compared to the TET group. Additionally, the MDT group displayed a significant decrease pain interference, while the TET group had an increase grip strength. Patients who received the MDT reported less fatigue and pain interference, and an increase in their overall physical functioning. Overall, the MDT was a more efficacious method to manage CLBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jabr.12132\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jabr.12132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jabr.12132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

当前研究的目的是检查两种运动技术——多维治疗(MDT)和传统的高级运动疗法(TET)——对诊断为慢性腰痛(CLBP)的老年人的相对疗效。在满足CLBP存在的要求后,参与者(N = 16)被随机分配到MDT (N = 8)或TET (N = 8)组。MDT组的参与者接受了个性化的锻炼计划,而TET组的参与者则参加了团体锻炼计划。采用曼-惠特尼测试来确定干预前后心理社会和生理变量之间的差异。统计分析表明,在干预前评估中,身体或社会心理变量没有显著差异。然而,与TET组相比,MDT组的参与者报告疲劳和疼痛干扰减少,身体功能增加。此外,MDT组疼痛干扰明显减少,而TET组握力增加。接受MDT的患者报告疲劳和疼痛干扰减少,整体身体功能增加。总的来说,MDT是治疗CLBP更有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relative efficacy of two exercise methods for older adults with chronic low back pain: A preliminary randomized control study

The objective of the current study was to examine the relative efficacy of two exercise techniques—a multidimensional treatment (MDT) and a traditional senior exercise therapy treatment (TET)—in older adults diagnosed with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Participants (N = 16) were randomly assigned to either the MDT (n = 8) or TET (n = 8) groups after meeting the requirements for the presence of CLBP. Participants in the MDT group received an individualized exercise program, while participants in the TET participated in a group exercise program. A Mann–Whitney test was conducted to determine differences between psychosocial and physical variables pre- and post-intervention. Statistical analyses indicated no significant differences in physical or psychosocial variables at pre-intervention assessment. However, participants in the MDT group reported a decrease in fatigue and pain interference, with an increase in physical functioning, when compared to the TET group. Additionally, the MDT group displayed a significant decrease pain interference, while the TET group had an increase grip strength. Patients who received the MDT reported less fatigue and pain interference, and an increase in their overall physical functioning. Overall, the MDT was a more efficacious method to manage CLBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, launched in 1993, aims to disseminate findings of behavioral science research which have applications to current problems of society. By publishing relevant research and emphasizing the excellence of experimental design, as well as potential applicability of experimental results, the journal bridges the theoretical and applied areas of biobehavioral research. The Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research serves as a means of communication among scientists, as well as between researchers and those engaged in the task of solving social and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信