Smith and Philpott诉Athol Administration Limited和ors，Milewood Purpose Trust（2021），CHP2020/93

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW

Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttab079

Jonathan Rimmer

{"title":"Smith and Philpott诉Athol Administration Limited和ors，Milewood Purpose Trust（2021），CHP2020/93","authors":"Jonathan Rimmer","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Rimmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttab079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

现在已经形成了一套判例法，涉及到众所周知的普通法法院的管辖权，即对基于严重错误而作出的自愿处置进行干预。但是，如果已经考虑过处理的情况呢?是否存在重大或任何对价否定了衡平法上的救济?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93

A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Trusts & Trustees LAW-

自引率

66.70%

发文量