在维生素D缺乏症患者中,以相似的累积剂量每日口服维生素D3方案比每周口服维生素D3方案更有效

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Romina Hamedooni-Asl, F. Sajedi, Y. Mohammadi, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Ehsan Mirzaei, A. Eshraghi, M. Mehrpooya
{"title":"在维生素D缺乏症患者中,以相似的累积剂量每日口服维生素D3方案比每周口服维生素D3方案更有效","authors":"Romina Hamedooni-Asl, F. Sajedi, Y. Mohammadi, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Ehsan Mirzaei, A. Eshraghi, M. Mehrpooya","doi":"10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_73_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Vitamin D deficiency is a common health problem worldwide, especially in the Middle Eastern region. Although various dosing regimens of vitamin D have been used for the treatment of vitamin D deficiency, it is still unclear as to which dosing regimen can efficiently increase the serum level of vitamin D in different patient population. Aim: This study was designed to compare the efficacy of weekly and daily regimens of vitamin D3 in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Settings and Design: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the autumn and winter of 2016 and 2017, Hamadan, Iran. Materials and Methods: A total of 130 patients with moderate to severe hypovitaminosis D were allocated into two groups: weekly 50,000 IU (routine recommended dose for vitamin deficiency treatment) or daily 4,000 IU (safe upper limit dose of vitamin D per day) of oral vitamin D3 for 8 and 14 weeks, respectively. The serum levels of 25-OH-vitamin D were measured in all patients at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. Results: Results of this study showed that though both dosing regimens can be effective in increasing the serum level of 25-OH-vitamin D, higher percentage of the subjects in the daily regimen group achieved the sufficient serum level of 25-OH-vitamin D when compared to the weekly regimen group. Conclusion: Accordingly, probably owing to better bioavailability of daily regimen of vitamin D3 and establishment of a more steady serum concentration compared with weekly regimen, it can be recommended as the preferred dosing regimen for effective treatment of vitamin D deficiency.","PeriodicalId":16966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daily oral vitamin D3 regimen in similar cumulative doses is more effective than weekly oral vitamin D3 regimen in patients with vitamin D deficiency\",\"authors\":\"Romina Hamedooni-Asl, F. Sajedi, Y. Mohammadi, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Ehsan Mirzaei, A. Eshraghi, M. Mehrpooya\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_73_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Vitamin D deficiency is a common health problem worldwide, especially in the Middle Eastern region. Although various dosing regimens of vitamin D have been used for the treatment of vitamin D deficiency, it is still unclear as to which dosing regimen can efficiently increase the serum level of vitamin D in different patient population. Aim: This study was designed to compare the efficacy of weekly and daily regimens of vitamin D3 in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Settings and Design: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the autumn and winter of 2016 and 2017, Hamadan, Iran. Materials and Methods: A total of 130 patients with moderate to severe hypovitaminosis D were allocated into two groups: weekly 50,000 IU (routine recommended dose for vitamin deficiency treatment) or daily 4,000 IU (safe upper limit dose of vitamin D per day) of oral vitamin D3 for 8 and 14 weeks, respectively. The serum levels of 25-OH-vitamin D were measured in all patients at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. Results: Results of this study showed that though both dosing regimens can be effective in increasing the serum level of 25-OH-vitamin D, higher percentage of the subjects in the daily regimen group achieved the sufficient serum level of 25-OH-vitamin D when compared to the weekly regimen group. Conclusion: Accordingly, probably owing to better bioavailability of daily regimen of vitamin D3 and establishment of a more steady serum concentration compared with weekly regimen, it can be recommended as the preferred dosing regimen for effective treatment of vitamin D deficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_73_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrptps.JRPTPS_73_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:维生素D缺乏症是全世界普遍存在的健康问题,尤其是在中东地区。尽管已有多种维生素D给药方案用于治疗维生素D缺乏症,但目前尚不清楚哪种给药方案能有效提高不同患者人群的血清维生素D水平。目的:本研究旨在比较维生素D缺乏症患者每周和每日服用维生素D3的疗效。环境和设计:一项随机临床试验于2016年秋冬和2017年在伊朗哈马丹进行。材料与方法:将130例中重度维生素D缺乏症患者分为两组:每周50,000 IU(维生素缺乏症治疗的常规推荐剂量)和每天4,000 IU(维生素D的安全上限剂量)口服维生素D3,分别持续8周和14周。在基线和治疗期结束时测量所有患者的血清25- oh -维生素D水平。结果:本研究结果显示,虽然两种给药方案均可有效提高血清25- oh -维生素D水平,但与每周给药组相比,每日给药组达到足够血清25- oh -维生素D水平的受试者比例更高。结论:与周给药相比,可能由于维生素D3日给药具有更好的生物利用度和更稳定的血清浓度,可作为有效治疗维生素D缺乏症的首选给药方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Daily oral vitamin D3 regimen in similar cumulative doses is more effective than weekly oral vitamin D3 regimen in patients with vitamin D deficiency
Context: Vitamin D deficiency is a common health problem worldwide, especially in the Middle Eastern region. Although various dosing regimens of vitamin D have been used for the treatment of vitamin D deficiency, it is still unclear as to which dosing regimen can efficiently increase the serum level of vitamin D in different patient population. Aim: This study was designed to compare the efficacy of weekly and daily regimens of vitamin D3 in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Settings and Design: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the autumn and winter of 2016 and 2017, Hamadan, Iran. Materials and Methods: A total of 130 patients with moderate to severe hypovitaminosis D were allocated into two groups: weekly 50,000 IU (routine recommended dose for vitamin deficiency treatment) or daily 4,000 IU (safe upper limit dose of vitamin D per day) of oral vitamin D3 for 8 and 14 weeks, respectively. The serum levels of 25-OH-vitamin D were measured in all patients at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. Results: Results of this study showed that though both dosing regimens can be effective in increasing the serum level of 25-OH-vitamin D, higher percentage of the subjects in the daily regimen group achieved the sufficient serum level of 25-OH-vitamin D when compared to the weekly regimen group. Conclusion: Accordingly, probably owing to better bioavailability of daily regimen of vitamin D3 and establishment of a more steady serum concentration compared with weekly regimen, it can be recommended as the preferred dosing regimen for effective treatment of vitamin D deficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences
Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences(JRPS) is a biannually peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical publication to serve as a means for scientific information exchange in the international pharmaceutical forum. It accepts novel findings that contribute to advancement of scientific knowledge in pharmaceutical fields that not published or under consideration for publication anywhere else for publication in JRPS as original research article. all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences consist of medicinal chemistry, molecular modeling, drug design, pharmaceutics, biopharmacy, pharmaceutical nanotechnology, pharmacognosy, natural products, pharmaceutical biotechnology, pharmacology, toxicology and clinical pharmacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信