我应该照别人说的做吗？信托、专家和新冠肺炎

IF 1.1 4区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Pub Date : 2020-11-14 DOI:10.1353/ken.2020.0014

M. Bennett

{"title":"我应该照别人说的做吗？信托、专家和新冠肺炎","authors":"M. Bennett","doi":"10.1353/ken.2020.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The success of public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic is sensitive to public trust in experts. Despite a great deal of attention to attitudes towards experts in the context of such crises, one significant feature of public trust remains underexamined. When public policy claims to follow the science, citizens are asked not just to believe what they are told by experts, but to follow expert recommendations. I argue that this requires a more demanding form of trust, which I call recommendation trust. I argue for three claims about recommendation trust: recommendation trust is different from both epistemic and practical trust; the conditions for well-placed recommendation trust are more demanding than the conditions for well-placed epistemic trust; and many measures that have been proposed to cultivate trust in experts do not give the public good reasons to trust in expert-led policy.","PeriodicalId":46167,"journal":{"name":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"243 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ken.2020.0014","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should I Do as I’m Told? Trust, Experts, and COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"M. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ken.2020.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:The success of public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic is sensitive to public trust in experts. Despite a great deal of attention to attitudes towards experts in the context of such crises, one significant feature of public trust remains underexamined. When public policy claims to follow the science, citizens are asked not just to believe what they are told by experts, but to follow expert recommendations. I argue that this requires a more demanding form of trust, which I call recommendation trust. I argue for three claims about recommendation trust: recommendation trust is different from both epistemic and practical trust; the conditions for well-placed recommendation trust are more demanding than the conditions for well-placed epistemic trust; and many measures that have been proposed to cultivate trust in experts do not give the public good reasons to trust in expert-led policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ken.2020.0014\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2020.0014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2020.0014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 30

摘要

摘要:COVID-19大流行公共卫生应对的成功与公众对专家的信任息息相关。尽管在这种危机背景下对专家的态度引起了大量关注，但公众信任的一个重要特征仍未得到充分研究。当公共政策声称遵循科学时，公民不仅要相信专家告诉他们的，而且要遵循专家的建议。我认为这需要一种更严格的信任形式，我称之为推荐信任。笔者对推荐信任提出了三点主张:推荐信任既不同于认知信任，也不同于实践信任;推荐信任的条件比认知信任的条件要求高;而且，许多旨在培养对专家信任的措施，并没有给公众充分的理由去信任专家主导的政策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Should I Do as I’m Told? Trust, Experts, and COVID-19

ABSTRACT:The success of public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic is sensitive to public trust in experts. Despite a great deal of attention to attitudes towards experts in the context of such crises, one significant feature of public trust remains underexamined. When public policy claims to follow the science, citizens are asked not just to believe what they are told by experts, but to follow expert recommendations. I argue that this requires a more demanding form of trust, which I call recommendation trust. I argue for three claims about recommendation trust: recommendation trust is different from both epistemic and practical trust; the conditions for well-placed recommendation trust are more demanding than the conditions for well-placed epistemic trust; and many measures that have been proposed to cultivate trust in experts do not give the public good reasons to trust in expert-led policy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal offers a scholarly forum for diverse views on major issues in bioethics, such as analysis and critique of principlism, feminist perspectives in bioethics, the work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, active euthanasia, genetics, health care reform, and organ transplantation. Each issue includes "Scope Notes," an overview and extensive annotated bibliography on a specific topic in bioethics, and "Bioethics Inside the Beltway," a report written by a Washington insider updating bioethics activities on the federal level.