癌症SBRT术后放射性肺炎与局部肿瘤复发的鉴别

Q3 Medicine
B. Frerker, G. Hildebrandt
{"title":"癌症SBRT术后放射性肺炎与局部肿瘤复发的鉴别","authors":"B. Frerker, G. Hildebrandt","doi":"10.2147/rmi.s176901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Radiation pneumonitis is one of the most common toxicities following SBRT for lung cancer. Although local control rates are good, a recurrent tumour is dif fi cult to distinguish from radiation pneumonitis due to similar size and morphology. Therefore, early detection of a recurrent tumour is challenging, and moreover, it is crucial for affected patients, as early detection enables curative salvage therapy. Promising data exists to solve these challenges for late recurrences, for example, the analysis of high-risk CT features allows prediction of recurrence after 12 months. But particularly in cases of early recurrences and radiation pneumonitis, comprehensive data are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review the existing literature with special regard to radiological response assessment after stereotactic body radiotherapy and risk factors for predicting radiation pneumonitis or local recurrence. (PET) is encouraging. Huang et al developed a follow-up algorithm for response-assessment after SBRT, in which a PET is recommended in some cases, and Dong et al demonstrated that patients with high metabolic activity (described as SUVmax) before treatment had a worse overall survival. Nevertheless, the interpretation of a PET-scan should be done carefully as there is no optimal SUVmax threshold for predicting local recurrence or radiation pneumonitis. Another approach is to analyse of dosimetric parameters before performing SBRT, and indeed, some parameters seem to be associated with radiation pneumonitis, but again no speci fi c dose constraints are found yet. We found promising data in the literature, but the results are controversial, and a conclusion could not be drawn.","PeriodicalId":39053,"journal":{"name":"Reports in Medical Imaging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/rmi.s176901","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing Radiation Pneumonitis from Local Tumour Recurrence Following SBRT for Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"B. Frerker, G. Hildebrandt\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/rmi.s176901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Radiation pneumonitis is one of the most common toxicities following SBRT for lung cancer. Although local control rates are good, a recurrent tumour is dif fi cult to distinguish from radiation pneumonitis due to similar size and morphology. Therefore, early detection of a recurrent tumour is challenging, and moreover, it is crucial for affected patients, as early detection enables curative salvage therapy. Promising data exists to solve these challenges for late recurrences, for example, the analysis of high-risk CT features allows prediction of recurrence after 12 months. But particularly in cases of early recurrences and radiation pneumonitis, comprehensive data are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review the existing literature with special regard to radiological response assessment after stereotactic body radiotherapy and risk factors for predicting radiation pneumonitis or local recurrence. (PET) is encouraging. Huang et al developed a follow-up algorithm for response-assessment after SBRT, in which a PET is recommended in some cases, and Dong et al demonstrated that patients with high metabolic activity (described as SUVmax) before treatment had a worse overall survival. Nevertheless, the interpretation of a PET-scan should be done carefully as there is no optimal SUVmax threshold for predicting local recurrence or radiation pneumonitis. Another approach is to analyse of dosimetric parameters before performing SBRT, and indeed, some parameters seem to be associated with radiation pneumonitis, but again no speci fi c dose constraints are found yet. We found promising data in the literature, but the results are controversial, and a conclusion could not be drawn.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports in Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/rmi.s176901\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports in Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/rmi.s176901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports in Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/rmi.s176901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射性肺炎是肺癌SBRT后最常见的毒性之一。虽然局部控制率很好,但由于肿瘤大小和形态相似,复发性肿瘤很难与放射性肺炎区分。因此,早期发现复发肿瘤是具有挑战性的,此外,它对受影响的患者至关重要,因为早期发现可以进行治愈性挽救治疗。有希望的数据可以解决晚期复发的这些挑战,例如,高风险CT特征的分析可以预测12个月后的复发。但特别是在早期复发和放射性肺炎的病例中,缺乏全面的数据。因此,本研究的目的是回顾现有文献,特别是关于立体定向放射治疗后放射反应评估和预测放射性肺炎或局部复发的危险因素。(PET)是令人鼓舞的。Huang等人开发了一种用于SBRT后反应评估的随访算法,其中在某些情况下推荐PET, Dong等人证明,治疗前代谢活性高(称为SUVmax)的患者总生存率较差。然而,pet扫描结果的解释应谨慎进行,因为预测局部复发或放射性肺炎没有最佳的SUVmax阈值。另一种方法是在进行SBRT之前分析剂量学参数,事实上,一些参数似乎与放射性肺炎有关,但同样没有发现特定的剂量限制。我们在文献中发现了有希望的数据,但结果存在争议,无法得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing Radiation Pneumonitis from Local Tumour Recurrence Following SBRT for Lung Cancer
: Radiation pneumonitis is one of the most common toxicities following SBRT for lung cancer. Although local control rates are good, a recurrent tumour is dif fi cult to distinguish from radiation pneumonitis due to similar size and morphology. Therefore, early detection of a recurrent tumour is challenging, and moreover, it is crucial for affected patients, as early detection enables curative salvage therapy. Promising data exists to solve these challenges for late recurrences, for example, the analysis of high-risk CT features allows prediction of recurrence after 12 months. But particularly in cases of early recurrences and radiation pneumonitis, comprehensive data are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review the existing literature with special regard to radiological response assessment after stereotactic body radiotherapy and risk factors for predicting radiation pneumonitis or local recurrence. (PET) is encouraging. Huang et al developed a follow-up algorithm for response-assessment after SBRT, in which a PET is recommended in some cases, and Dong et al demonstrated that patients with high metabolic activity (described as SUVmax) before treatment had a worse overall survival. Nevertheless, the interpretation of a PET-scan should be done carefully as there is no optimal SUVmax threshold for predicting local recurrence or radiation pneumonitis. Another approach is to analyse of dosimetric parameters before performing SBRT, and indeed, some parameters seem to be associated with radiation pneumonitis, but again no speci fi c dose constraints are found yet. We found promising data in the literature, but the results are controversial, and a conclusion could not be drawn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reports in Medical Imaging
Reports in Medical Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信