{"title":"张伯伦立体地图投影的变体","authors":"Brenton R. S. Recht","doi":"10.1080/15230406.2021.1975571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We present a variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection. This new projection, which we call the matrix trimetric projection, consists of a linear transformation of the squares of the distances between a given point and three control points. The formula of the forward projection is simpler than the Chamberlin projection, and admits an inverse formula which requires numerical iteration of only one parameter. We make comparisons between the two projections using a representative list of control points. The Chamberlin trimetric projection outperforms the matrix trimetric projection on measures of angle deformation and area deformation, but the opposite is true for a measure of distance deformation, and the difference between the results of the projections is small over all measures. The forward Matrix trimetric projection can be calculated in half the time of the Chamberlin trimetric projection. We conclude that the matrix trimetric projection is a viable alternative to the Chamberlin trimetric projection, especially if an inverse is required or speed is important.","PeriodicalId":47562,"journal":{"name":"Cartography and Geographic Information Science","volume":"49 1","pages":"85 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection\",\"authors\":\"Brenton R. S. Recht\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15230406.2021.1975571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We present a variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection. This new projection, which we call the matrix trimetric projection, consists of a linear transformation of the squares of the distances between a given point and three control points. The formula of the forward projection is simpler than the Chamberlin projection, and admits an inverse formula which requires numerical iteration of only one parameter. We make comparisons between the two projections using a representative list of control points. The Chamberlin trimetric projection outperforms the matrix trimetric projection on measures of angle deformation and area deformation, but the opposite is true for a measure of distance deformation, and the difference between the results of the projections is small over all measures. The forward Matrix trimetric projection can be calculated in half the time of the Chamberlin trimetric projection. We conclude that the matrix trimetric projection is a viable alternative to the Chamberlin trimetric projection, especially if an inverse is required or speed is important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cartography and Geographic Information Science\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cartography and Geographic Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.1975571\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cartography and Geographic Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.1975571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection
ABSTRACT We present a variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection. This new projection, which we call the matrix trimetric projection, consists of a linear transformation of the squares of the distances between a given point and three control points. The formula of the forward projection is simpler than the Chamberlin projection, and admits an inverse formula which requires numerical iteration of only one parameter. We make comparisons between the two projections using a representative list of control points. The Chamberlin trimetric projection outperforms the matrix trimetric projection on measures of angle deformation and area deformation, but the opposite is true for a measure of distance deformation, and the difference between the results of the projections is small over all measures. The forward Matrix trimetric projection can be calculated in half the time of the Chamberlin trimetric projection. We conclude that the matrix trimetric projection is a viable alternative to the Chamberlin trimetric projection, especially if an inverse is required or speed is important.
期刊介绍:
Cartography and Geographic Information Science (CaGIS) is the official publication of the Cartography and Geographic Information Society (CaGIS), a member organization of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM). The Cartography and Geographic Information Society supports research, education, and practices that improve the understanding, creation, analysis, and use of maps and geographic information. The society serves as a forum for the exchange of original concepts, techniques, approaches, and experiences by those who design, implement, and use geospatial technologies through the publication of authoritative articles and international papers.