格拉斯哥智力残疾人抑郁量表(GDS-LD)和格拉斯哥抑郁护理补充量表(GDS-CS)的西班牙验证

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Mercedes H. Nuñez-Polo, Elena M Lorenzo-Llamas, M. Alonso-Rodríguez, J. Ayuso-Mateos, A. Martorell
{"title":"格拉斯哥智力残疾人抑郁量表(GDS-LD)和格拉斯哥抑郁护理补充量表(GDS-CS)的西班牙验证","authors":"Mercedes H. Nuñez-Polo, Elena M Lorenzo-Llamas, M. Alonso-Rodríguez, J. Ayuso-Mateos, A. Martorell","doi":"10.1108/amhid-10-2022-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to validate a Spanish version of the Glasgow Depression Scale for Learning Disability (GDS-LD) and of the Glasgow Depression Care Supplement Scale (GDS-CS).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe GDS-LD was administered to 120 adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities and the GDS-CS to the staff from their occupational workshops (n = 120) to detect symptoms of depression. Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, construct validity and the feasibility and applicability of both scales were analysed.\n\n\nFindings\nBoth scales showed an adequate internal consistency (GDS-LD, a = 0.86) (GDS-CS, a = 0.88). Exploratory factor analysis revealed four well-defined factors in GDS-LD and three in GDS-CS. Pearson correlation analysis data has also been carried out with both tools for test-retest and inter-rater, showing good correlations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nIn terms, of limitations, the participants were recruited from the same centre, so this could be a problem in terms of generalisation. In addition, the GDS-LD and GDS-CS scales were developed for people with mild and moderate ID; it would be worth it to develop a version for people with severe and profound disabilities.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFrom its clinical perspective, it will be possible to have a specific tool that assesses the symptoms of depression in the Spanish population with ID. Furthermore, as it is a user-friendly scale; it can be administrated by both mental health and other professionals working in the field of disability.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe Spanish version of the GDS-LD and GDS-CS showed adequate rates of feasibility and reliability to assess symptoms depression among Spanish speaking adults with mild and moderate ID.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spanish validation of the Glasgow depression scale for people with intellectual disabilities (GDS-LD) and of the Glasgow depression care supplement scale (GDS-CS)\",\"authors\":\"Mercedes H. Nuñez-Polo, Elena M Lorenzo-Llamas, M. Alonso-Rodríguez, J. Ayuso-Mateos, A. Martorell\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/amhid-10-2022-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to validate a Spanish version of the Glasgow Depression Scale for Learning Disability (GDS-LD) and of the Glasgow Depression Care Supplement Scale (GDS-CS).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe GDS-LD was administered to 120 adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities and the GDS-CS to the staff from their occupational workshops (n = 120) to detect symptoms of depression. Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, construct validity and the feasibility and applicability of both scales were analysed.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nBoth scales showed an adequate internal consistency (GDS-LD, a = 0.86) (GDS-CS, a = 0.88). Exploratory factor analysis revealed four well-defined factors in GDS-LD and three in GDS-CS. Pearson correlation analysis data has also been carried out with both tools for test-retest and inter-rater, showing good correlations.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nIn terms, of limitations, the participants were recruited from the same centre, so this could be a problem in terms of generalisation. In addition, the GDS-LD and GDS-CS scales were developed for people with mild and moderate ID; it would be worth it to develop a version for people with severe and profound disabilities.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nFrom its clinical perspective, it will be possible to have a specific tool that assesses the symptoms of depression in the Spanish population with ID. Furthermore, as it is a user-friendly scale; it can be administrated by both mental health and other professionals working in the field of disability.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe Spanish version of the GDS-LD and GDS-CS showed adequate rates of feasibility and reliability to assess symptoms depression among Spanish speaking adults with mild and moderate ID.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-10-2022-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-10-2022-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在验证西班牙语版格拉斯哥学习障碍抑郁量表(GDS-LD)和格拉斯哥抑郁护理补充量表(GDS-CS)。设计/方法/方法对120名轻中度智力残疾成人和120名职业车间工作人员分别进行GDS-LD和GDS-CS检测抑郁症状。分析了两种量表的内部一致性、量表间信度、重测信度、量表效度、量表结构效度以及量表的可行性和适用性。结果两种量表均表现出足够的内部一致性(GDS-LD, a = 0.86) (GDS-CS, a = 0.88)。探索性因素分析显示GDS-LD有4个明确的因素,GDS-CS有3个因素。Pearson相关分析数据也与test-retest和inter-rater两种工具进行了比较,显示出良好的相关性。研究的局限性/意义就局限性而言,参与者是从同一中心招募的,因此这可能是概括方面的问题。此外,还编制了GDS-LD和GDS-CS量表。为严重残疾的人开发一个版本是值得的。实际意义从临床角度来看,有可能有一种特定的工具来评估西班牙ID人群的抑郁症状。此外,由于它是一个用户友好的规模;它可以由精神卫生和在残疾领域工作的其他专业人员管理。西班牙语版本的GDS-LD和GDS-CS显示出足够的可行性和可靠性来评估轻度和中度ID的西班牙语成人抑郁症症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spanish validation of the Glasgow depression scale for people with intellectual disabilities (GDS-LD) and of the Glasgow depression care supplement scale (GDS-CS)
Purpose This study aims to validate a Spanish version of the Glasgow Depression Scale for Learning Disability (GDS-LD) and of the Glasgow Depression Care Supplement Scale (GDS-CS). Design/methodology/approach The GDS-LD was administered to 120 adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities and the GDS-CS to the staff from their occupational workshops (n = 120) to detect symptoms of depression. Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, construct validity and the feasibility and applicability of both scales were analysed. Findings Both scales showed an adequate internal consistency (GDS-LD, a = 0.86) (GDS-CS, a = 0.88). Exploratory factor analysis revealed four well-defined factors in GDS-LD and three in GDS-CS. Pearson correlation analysis data has also been carried out with both tools for test-retest and inter-rater, showing good correlations. Research limitations/implications In terms, of limitations, the participants were recruited from the same centre, so this could be a problem in terms of generalisation. In addition, the GDS-LD and GDS-CS scales were developed for people with mild and moderate ID; it would be worth it to develop a version for people with severe and profound disabilities. Practical implications From its clinical perspective, it will be possible to have a specific tool that assesses the symptoms of depression in the Spanish population with ID. Furthermore, as it is a user-friendly scale; it can be administrated by both mental health and other professionals working in the field of disability. Originality/value The Spanish version of the GDS-LD and GDS-CS showed adequate rates of feasibility and reliability to assess symptoms depression among Spanish speaking adults with mild and moderate ID.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信