“与Pimp非常相似”:社区咨询委员会成员在健康相关社区参与性研究中的经验

Aporia Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI:10.18192/aporia.v15i1.6487
Laurel Schmanda, A. Giles, Carrie Martin, Michael Liddell
{"title":"“与Pimp非常相似”:社区咨询委员会成员在健康相关社区参与性研究中的经验","authors":"Laurel Schmanda, A. Giles, Carrie Martin, Michael Liddell","doi":"10.18192/aporia.v15i1.6487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the abundance of research on the experiences of researchers with community-based participatory research (CBPR), there has been comparatively little published on CAB members’ experiences. The goal of this research was to analyze the lived experiences of a small sample of CAB members in recent health-focused CBPR in Canada, with a particular focus on areas for improvement. We found that CAB members in CBPR experienced low perceived value from researchers due to communication patterns, education differences, and inadequate compensation. These issues may be mitigated through increased CAB member engagement throughout the research process, adequate compensation, and improved emotional support. This study demonstrates that if CBPR methodologies are to live up to their promise, it is crucial that CAB members are enabled to work in true partnership with researchers, receive adequate compensation that is meaningful to them, and are supported throughout the process.\n ","PeriodicalId":30068,"journal":{"name":"Aporia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Very Similar to Having a Pimp”: Community Advisory Board Members’ Experiences in Health-Related Community-Based Participatory Research\",\"authors\":\"Laurel Schmanda, A. Giles, Carrie Martin, Michael Liddell\",\"doi\":\"10.18192/aporia.v15i1.6487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the abundance of research on the experiences of researchers with community-based participatory research (CBPR), there has been comparatively little published on CAB members’ experiences. The goal of this research was to analyze the lived experiences of a small sample of CAB members in recent health-focused CBPR in Canada, with a particular focus on areas for improvement. We found that CAB members in CBPR experienced low perceived value from researchers due to communication patterns, education differences, and inadequate compensation. These issues may be mitigated through increased CAB member engagement throughout the research process, adequate compensation, and improved emotional support. This study demonstrates that if CBPR methodologies are to live up to their promise, it is crucial that CAB members are enabled to work in true partnership with researchers, receive adequate compensation that is meaningful to them, and are supported throughout the process.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":30068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aporia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aporia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18192/aporia.v15i1.6487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aporia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/aporia.v15i1.6487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)的研究人员的经验进行了大量研究,但关于CAB成员的经验发表的文章相对较少。这项研究的目的是分析加拿大最近以健康为重点的CBPR中一小部分CAB成员的生活经历,特别关注需要改进的领域。我们发现,由于沟通模式、教育差异和补偿不足,CBPR中的CAB成员从研究人员那里获得的感知价值较低。这些问题可以通过增加CAB成员在整个研究过程中的参与度、适当的补偿和改善情感支持来缓解。这项研究表明,如果CBPR方法要实现其承诺,CAB成员能够与研究人员真正合作,获得对他们有意义的充分补偿,并在整个过程中得到支持,这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Very Similar to Having a Pimp”: Community Advisory Board Members’ Experiences in Health-Related Community-Based Participatory Research
Despite the abundance of research on the experiences of researchers with community-based participatory research (CBPR), there has been comparatively little published on CAB members’ experiences. The goal of this research was to analyze the lived experiences of a small sample of CAB members in recent health-focused CBPR in Canada, with a particular focus on areas for improvement. We found that CAB members in CBPR experienced low perceived value from researchers due to communication patterns, education differences, and inadequate compensation. These issues may be mitigated through increased CAB member engagement throughout the research process, adequate compensation, and improved emotional support. This study demonstrates that if CBPR methodologies are to live up to their promise, it is crucial that CAB members are enabled to work in true partnership with researchers, receive adequate compensation that is meaningful to them, and are supported throughout the process.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信