历史,腹地和电影中的敏感阿司匹林和秃鹫

Marcelo Fidelis Kockel
{"title":"历史,腹地和电影中的敏感阿司匹林和秃鹫","authors":"Marcelo Fidelis Kockel","doi":"10.26512/EMTEMPOS.V1I37.33346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We intend to observe how the film Cinema aspirinas e urubus (2005), by director Marcelo Gomes, works as a device for thinking about history and the sertao as a multiplicity in progress, something that goes beyond a “representation” and a “real” referent, forming a complex and chaotic tangle that branches into different discourses. Thus, when analyzing the film, we do not want to cement an answer, a certainty or a definitive truth, but rather to establish intertextualities, to suggest new questions and put a thought in motion, making it seductive, provocative and debatable among historians, in order to enhance their knowledge and seek more critical and creative paths in relation to the current impasses of historiographical production.","PeriodicalId":30228,"journal":{"name":"Em Tempo de Historias","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"História, sertão e devir-sensível em Cinema aspirinas e urubus\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Fidelis Kockel\",\"doi\":\"10.26512/EMTEMPOS.V1I37.33346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We intend to observe how the film Cinema aspirinas e urubus (2005), by director Marcelo Gomes, works as a device for thinking about history and the sertao as a multiplicity in progress, something that goes beyond a “representation” and a “real” referent, forming a complex and chaotic tangle that branches into different discourses. Thus, when analyzing the film, we do not want to cement an answer, a certainty or a definitive truth, but rather to establish intertextualities, to suggest new questions and put a thought in motion, making it seductive, provocative and debatable among historians, in order to enhance their knowledge and seek more critical and creative paths in relation to the current impasses of historiographical production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Em Tempo de Historias\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Em Tempo de Historias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26512/EMTEMPOS.V1I37.33346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Em Tempo de Historias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26512/EMTEMPOS.V1I37.33346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们打算观察导演马塞洛·戈麦斯(Marcelo Gomes) 2005年的电影《Cinema aspirinas e urubus》(Cinema aspirinas e urubus, 2005)如何作为一种工具,将历史和sertao视为一种进步中的多样性,一种超越“表象”和“真实”所指的东西,形成一个复杂而混乱的纠结,分支成不同的话语。因此,在分析这部电影时,我们并不想要巩固一个答案,一个确定性或一个明确的真相,而是要建立互文性,提出新的问题,并将一种思想置于运动中,使其在历史学家中具有诱惑性、挑衅性和可辩论性,以增强他们的知识,并寻求与当前历史编纂的僵局有关的更具批判性和创造性的路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
História, sertão e devir-sensível em Cinema aspirinas e urubus
We intend to observe how the film Cinema aspirinas e urubus (2005), by director Marcelo Gomes, works as a device for thinking about history and the sertao as a multiplicity in progress, something that goes beyond a “representation” and a “real” referent, forming a complex and chaotic tangle that branches into different discourses. Thus, when analyzing the film, we do not want to cement an answer, a certainty or a definitive truth, but rather to establish intertextualities, to suggest new questions and put a thought in motion, making it seductive, provocative and debatable among historians, in order to enhance their knowledge and seek more critical and creative paths in relation to the current impasses of historiographical production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信