伊朗第二语言研究者对研究伦理的看法

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zhila Gharaveisi, A. Dastgoshadeh
{"title":"伊朗第二语言研究者对研究伦理的看法","authors":"Zhila Gharaveisi, A. Dastgoshadeh","doi":"10.19183/how.27.1.474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at exploring L2 researchers’ perspectives on research ethics in Iran. A total of ten teacher researchers were selected among a larger group of researchers based on the criteria of academic degree and familiarity with research principles. They were interviewed about different aspects of research ethics. Their responses were audio-recorded and transcribed by the researcher. Finally, the emerging themes were extracted from the responses which showed plagiarism, data management, participant rights, and authorship rights as the most frequent themes discussed by the respondents. Furthermore, the extent of the participants’ self-expressed adherence to ethical considerations in research was differential, ranging from a minimum amount of adherence to an acceptable degree of adherence and commitment to research ethics. In addition, the results showed that not all participants had a clear understanding and definition of the four major themes which emerged from the results.","PeriodicalId":43460,"journal":{"name":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","volume":"27 1","pages":"107-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iranian L2 Researchers' Perspectives on Research Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Zhila Gharaveisi, A. Dastgoshadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.19183/how.27.1.474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims at exploring L2 researchers’ perspectives on research ethics in Iran. A total of ten teacher researchers were selected among a larger group of researchers based on the criteria of academic degree and familiarity with research principles. They were interviewed about different aspects of research ethics. Their responses were audio-recorded and transcribed by the researcher. Finally, the emerging themes were extracted from the responses which showed plagiarism, data management, participant rights, and authorship rights as the most frequent themes discussed by the respondents. Furthermore, the extent of the participants’ self-expressed adherence to ethical considerations in research was differential, ranging from a minimum amount of adherence to an acceptable degree of adherence and commitment to research ethics. In addition, the results showed that not all participants had a clear understanding and definition of the four major themes which emerged from the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"107-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨第二语言研究者对伊朗研究伦理的看法。根据学位和对研究原则的熟悉程度的标准,从更大的研究人员群体中选出了总共10名教师研究人员。他们就研究伦理的不同方面接受了采访。他们的回答被研究人员录音并转录。最后,从回复中提取出新兴主题,其中抄袭、数据管理、参与者权利和作者权利是受访者讨论最多的主题。此外,参与者在研究中自我表达对伦理考虑的遵守程度是不同的,从最低程度的遵守到可接受程度的遵守和对研究伦理的承诺。此外,结果显示,并非所有参与者都对结果中出现的四个主要主题有明确的理解和定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iranian L2 Researchers' Perspectives on Research Ethics
This study aims at exploring L2 researchers’ perspectives on research ethics in Iran. A total of ten teacher researchers were selected among a larger group of researchers based on the criteria of academic degree and familiarity with research principles. They were interviewed about different aspects of research ethics. Their responses were audio-recorded and transcribed by the researcher. Finally, the emerging themes were extracted from the responses which showed plagiarism, data management, participant rights, and authorship rights as the most frequent themes discussed by the respondents. Furthermore, the extent of the participants’ self-expressed adherence to ethical considerations in research was differential, ranging from a minimum amount of adherence to an acceptable degree of adherence and commitment to research ethics. In addition, the results showed that not all participants had a clear understanding and definition of the four major themes which emerged from the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English
How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信