High Declaration,纺织加热传感器大师

Q4 Engineering
Burcu Arman Kuzubaşoğlu, Senem Kursun Bahadir
{"title":"High Declaration,纺织加热传感器大师","authors":"Burcu Arman Kuzubaşoğlu, Senem Kursun Bahadir","doi":"10.7216/1300759920222912501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the behavior of textile-based temperature sensors developed by inkjet printing technique in different humidity environments was investigated. Carbon nanotube (CNT), Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT: PSS), and CNT/PEDOT:PSS composites were used as temperature sensitive materials. Performance comparison of three different types of sensors was discussed. To evaluate the sensor sensitivity, the electrical resistance of the sensors was measured at temperatures ranging from 25 to 50 o C and under 65% and 85% relative humidity. Experimental results show that the sensor resistance can vary depending on the relative humidity and the selected material properties. Although the lowest measurement sensitivity in different humidity environments is in the CNT ink printed sensor, when the relative humidity rises from 65% to 85%, the change in temperature resistance coefficient (TCR, α) was found to be higher compared to the CNT/PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed sensor. The temperature sensor that exhibits the best stability to the change against 65-85% relative humidity is found to be CNT/ PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed temperature sensor (TCR change = 0.02 ° C -1 ). Therefore, it is more suitable to use CNT/ PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed temperature sensor for temperature sensor applications where the environmental conditions include 65-85% relative humidity. In general, it is concluded that temperature sensors containing CNT are less affected by humidity than temperature sensors containing PEDOT: PSS.","PeriodicalId":35281,"journal":{"name":"Tekstil ve Muhendis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nem Karşısında Yüksek Kararlılığa Sahip Tekstil Tabanlı Sıcaklık Sensörü\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Arman Kuzubaşoğlu, Senem Kursun Bahadir\",\"doi\":\"10.7216/1300759920222912501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the behavior of textile-based temperature sensors developed by inkjet printing technique in different humidity environments was investigated. Carbon nanotube (CNT), Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT: PSS), and CNT/PEDOT:PSS composites were used as temperature sensitive materials. Performance comparison of three different types of sensors was discussed. To evaluate the sensor sensitivity, the electrical resistance of the sensors was measured at temperatures ranging from 25 to 50 o C and under 65% and 85% relative humidity. Experimental results show that the sensor resistance can vary depending on the relative humidity and the selected material properties. Although the lowest measurement sensitivity in different humidity environments is in the CNT ink printed sensor, when the relative humidity rises from 65% to 85%, the change in temperature resistance coefficient (TCR, α) was found to be higher compared to the CNT/PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed sensor. The temperature sensor that exhibits the best stability to the change against 65-85% relative humidity is found to be CNT/ PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed temperature sensor (TCR change = 0.02 ° C -1 ). Therefore, it is more suitable to use CNT/ PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed temperature sensor for temperature sensor applications where the environmental conditions include 65-85% relative humidity. In general, it is concluded that temperature sensors containing CNT are less affected by humidity than temperature sensors containing PEDOT: PSS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tekstil ve Muhendis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tekstil ve Muhendis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7216/1300759920222912501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekstil ve Muhendis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7216/1300759920222912501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了采用喷墨打印技术研制的纺织温度传感器在不同湿度环境下的性能。以碳纳米管(CNT)、聚(3,4-乙烯二氧噻吩)聚苯乙烯磺酸盐(PEDOT: PSS)和CNT/PEDOT:PSS复合材料为温敏材料。讨论了三种不同类型传感器的性能比较。为了评估传感器的灵敏度,在温度范围为25至50℃,相对湿度为65%和85%的情况下测量传感器的电阻。实验结果表明,传感器电阻随相对湿度和所选材料性能的不同而变化。虽然不同湿度环境下的测量灵敏度最低的是CNT油墨印刷传感器,但当相对湿度从65%上升到85%时,其耐温系数(TCR, α)的变化高于CNT/PEDOT: PSS复合油墨印刷传感器。在65-85%的相对湿度下,表现出最佳稳定性的温度传感器是CNT/ PEDOT: PSS复合油墨印刷温度传感器(TCR变化= 0.02°C -1)。因此,对于环境条件包括65-85%相对湿度的温度传感器应用,更适合使用CNT/ PEDOT: PSS复合油墨印刷的温度传感器。总的来说,含有碳纳米管的温度传感器受湿度的影响比含有PEDOT: PSS的温度传感器小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nem Karşısında Yüksek Kararlılığa Sahip Tekstil Tabanlı Sıcaklık Sensörü
In this study, the behavior of textile-based temperature sensors developed by inkjet printing technique in different humidity environments was investigated. Carbon nanotube (CNT), Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT: PSS), and CNT/PEDOT:PSS composites were used as temperature sensitive materials. Performance comparison of three different types of sensors was discussed. To evaluate the sensor sensitivity, the electrical resistance of the sensors was measured at temperatures ranging from 25 to 50 o C and under 65% and 85% relative humidity. Experimental results show that the sensor resistance can vary depending on the relative humidity and the selected material properties. Although the lowest measurement sensitivity in different humidity environments is in the CNT ink printed sensor, when the relative humidity rises from 65% to 85%, the change in temperature resistance coefficient (TCR, α) was found to be higher compared to the CNT/PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed sensor. The temperature sensor that exhibits the best stability to the change against 65-85% relative humidity is found to be CNT/ PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed temperature sensor (TCR change = 0.02 ° C -1 ). Therefore, it is more suitable to use CNT/ PEDOT: PSS composite ink printed temperature sensor for temperature sensor applications where the environmental conditions include 65-85% relative humidity. In general, it is concluded that temperature sensors containing CNT are less affected by humidity than temperature sensors containing PEDOT: PSS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tekstil ve Muhendis
Tekstil ve Muhendis Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信