禁书名单和掠夺性出版商：指向谨慎的认证

IF 4.1 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Quantitative Science Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI:10.1162/qss_a_00251

M. Cascella, A. De Cassai, P. Navalesi

{"title":"禁书名单和掠夺性出版商：指向谨慎的认证","authors":"M. Cascella, A. De Cassai, P. Navalesi","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An article by Macháček and Srholec titled “Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences” was recently withdrawn by the journal Scientometrics (Macháček & Srholec, 2021). The motivations were the lack of a “control group,” and the restriction of the analysis “to publications in four languages.” Moreover, a letter from the Frontiers editor-inchief largely criticized the use of the famous Jeffrey Beall’s list to identify predatory publishers.","PeriodicalId":34021,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Science Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"489-490"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proscription lists and predatory publishers: Pointing to careful certifications\",\"authors\":\"M. Cascella, A. De Cassai, P. Navalesi\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/qss_a_00251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An article by Macháček and Srholec titled “Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences” was recently withdrawn by the journal Scientometrics (Macháček & Srholec, 2021). The motivations were the lack of a “control group,” and the restriction of the analysis “to publications in four languages.” Moreover, a letter from the Frontiers editor-inchief largely criticized the use of the famous Jeffrey Beall’s list to identify predatory publishers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Science Studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"489-490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Science Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Science Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Macháček和Srholec的一篇题为《Scopus的掠夺性出版：跨国差异的证据》的文章最近被《科学计量学》杂志撤回（Machásček&Srholec，2021）。其动机是缺乏“控制小组”，并将分析限制在“四种语言的出版物”。此外，《前沿》编辑inchief的一封信在很大程度上批评了使用著名的杰弗里·比尔名单来识别掠夺性出版商的做法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Proscription lists and predatory publishers: Pointing to careful certifications

An article by Macháček and Srholec titled “Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences” was recently withdrawn by the journal Scientometrics (Macháček & Srholec, 2021). The motivations were the lack of a “control group,” and the restriction of the analysis “to publications in four languages.” Moreover, a letter from the Frontiers editor-inchief largely criticized the use of the famous Jeffrey Beall’s list to identify predatory publishers.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Quantitative Science Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

12.10

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

22 weeks

期刊介绍：