实验室养殖和昆虫肉的生态系统服务效益

Annie Dahan, Lucas Paulson, B. Beauséjour
{"title":"实验室养殖和昆虫肉的生态系统服务效益","authors":"Annie Dahan, Lucas Paulson, B. Beauséjour","doi":"10.26443/msurj.v12i1.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Population and income growth are expected to augment meat demand, and consequently, the conversion of natural ecosystems into pasture. Promising alternatives to livestock, particularly lab-cultured and insect meats, use about 1% as much land. Utilizing these technologies could reduce pasture expansion and maintain natural ecosystem service values. This paper investigates: what is the value of the ecosystem services potentially maintained by reducing agricultural expansion through the adoption of cultured and insect meat?\nMethods: Total global livestock-associated agricultural expansion by 2050 was predicted using FAO livestock projections (1) multiplied by the average land-use per kilogram of meat (2) yielding 194Mha. This expansion was partitioned among ecosystems according to threat scores derived from past expansion (3). Changes to annual ecosystem service values were calculated using average global values from Costanza et al. (4) multiplied by predicted expansion per ecosystem.\nResults & Conclusion: Tropical forests and east-Asia were the most threatened ecosystem and region, respectively, by both area and value. The net loss in annual ecosystem service values in 2050 due to predicted livestock-associated agricultural expansion was calculated to be $732bn/yr, translating to a NPV of $6.62tn to 2050. The potential to save such large ecosystem services value justifies increased research and promotion of these protein production methods.\nLimitations: This research does not identify exact ecosystems that are both targeted by agricultural meat expansion and that yield large ecosystem benefits because it is not sufficiently spatially explicit. Thus, it should not be used as a reference for new ecosystem conservation zones.","PeriodicalId":91927,"journal":{"name":"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem Service Benefits of Lab-cultured and Insect Meat\",\"authors\":\"Annie Dahan, Lucas Paulson, B. Beauséjour\",\"doi\":\"10.26443/msurj.v12i1.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Population and income growth are expected to augment meat demand, and consequently, the conversion of natural ecosystems into pasture. Promising alternatives to livestock, particularly lab-cultured and insect meats, use about 1% as much land. Utilizing these technologies could reduce pasture expansion and maintain natural ecosystem service values. This paper investigates: what is the value of the ecosystem services potentially maintained by reducing agricultural expansion through the adoption of cultured and insect meat?\\nMethods: Total global livestock-associated agricultural expansion by 2050 was predicted using FAO livestock projections (1) multiplied by the average land-use per kilogram of meat (2) yielding 194Mha. This expansion was partitioned among ecosystems according to threat scores derived from past expansion (3). Changes to annual ecosystem service values were calculated using average global values from Costanza et al. (4) multiplied by predicted expansion per ecosystem.\\nResults & Conclusion: Tropical forests and east-Asia were the most threatened ecosystem and region, respectively, by both area and value. The net loss in annual ecosystem service values in 2050 due to predicted livestock-associated agricultural expansion was calculated to be $732bn/yr, translating to a NPV of $6.62tn to 2050. The potential to save such large ecosystem services value justifies increased research and promotion of these protein production methods.\\nLimitations: This research does not identify exact ecosystems that are both targeted by agricultural meat expansion and that yield large ecosystem benefits because it is not sufficiently spatially explicit. Thus, it should not be used as a reference for new ecosystem conservation zones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26443/msurj.v12i1.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/msurj.v12i1.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人口和收入增长预计将增加肉类需求,从而将自然生态系统转变为牧场。有前景的牲畜替代品,特别是实验室培育的肉类和昆虫肉,占用了大约1%的土地。利用这些技术可以减少牧场扩张,并保持自然生态系统的服务价值。本文调查了:通过采用养殖肉和昆虫肉来减少农业扩张,生态系统服务的潜在价值是什么?方法:使用粮农组织牲畜预测(1)乘以每公斤肉类的平均土地利用率(2),预测到2050年全球与牲畜相关的农业扩张总量,产量为1.94亿公顷。根据过去扩张得出的威胁得分,在生态系统中对这种扩张进行了划分(3)。年度生态系统服务价值的变化是使用Costanza等人的全球平均值计算的。(4)乘以每个生态系统的预测扩张。结果与结论:从面积和价值来看,热带森林和东亚分别是最受威胁的生态系统和地区。预计到2050年,由于畜牧业相关的农业扩张,每年生态系统服务价值的净损失为7320亿美元,到2050年的净现值为66.2万亿美元。拯救如此巨大的生态系统服务价值的潜力证明了增加对这些蛋白质生产方法的研究和推广是合理的。局限性:这项研究没有确定农业肉类扩张的目标和产生巨大生态系统效益的确切生态系统,因为它在空间上不够明确。因此,不应将其作为新的生态系统保护区的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecosystem Service Benefits of Lab-cultured and Insect Meat
Background: Population and income growth are expected to augment meat demand, and consequently, the conversion of natural ecosystems into pasture. Promising alternatives to livestock, particularly lab-cultured and insect meats, use about 1% as much land. Utilizing these technologies could reduce pasture expansion and maintain natural ecosystem service values. This paper investigates: what is the value of the ecosystem services potentially maintained by reducing agricultural expansion through the adoption of cultured and insect meat? Methods: Total global livestock-associated agricultural expansion by 2050 was predicted using FAO livestock projections (1) multiplied by the average land-use per kilogram of meat (2) yielding 194Mha. This expansion was partitioned among ecosystems according to threat scores derived from past expansion (3). Changes to annual ecosystem service values were calculated using average global values from Costanza et al. (4) multiplied by predicted expansion per ecosystem. Results & Conclusion: Tropical forests and east-Asia were the most threatened ecosystem and region, respectively, by both area and value. The net loss in annual ecosystem service values in 2050 due to predicted livestock-associated agricultural expansion was calculated to be $732bn/yr, translating to a NPV of $6.62tn to 2050. The potential to save such large ecosystem services value justifies increased research and promotion of these protein production methods. Limitations: This research does not identify exact ecosystems that are both targeted by agricultural meat expansion and that yield large ecosystem benefits because it is not sufficiently spatially explicit. Thus, it should not be used as a reference for new ecosystem conservation zones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信