新自由主义和多元文化时代文化资本的蜕变:走向比较方法

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Gisèle Sapiro
{"title":"新自由主义和多元文化时代文化资本的蜕变:走向比较方法","authors":"Gisèle Sapiro","doi":"10.1177/14407833221146793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review essay of Fields, Capitals, Habitus first discusses how this in-depth inquiry into the lifestyles and cultural practices in Australia contributes to the rich discussions sparked by the publication and translation of Bourdieu's Distinction. It then turns to research directions that this survey opens up, especially in comparative perspective, in the context of neoliberalism and multiculturalism. One of these directions is to study the rise of Indigenous capital. A second is to compare the way that transnational, Indigenous and migrant cultures challenge the national habitus. A third invites researchers to compare more systematically gendered practices across fields and countries, a study that should be supplemented by the impact of the feminisation of cultural intermediaries.","PeriodicalId":47556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociology","volume":"59 1","pages":"310 - 317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The metamorphoses of cultural capital in a neoliberal and multicultural era: Towards a comparative approach\",\"authors\":\"Gisèle Sapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14407833221146793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review essay of Fields, Capitals, Habitus first discusses how this in-depth inquiry into the lifestyles and cultural practices in Australia contributes to the rich discussions sparked by the publication and translation of Bourdieu's Distinction. It then turns to research directions that this survey opens up, especially in comparative perspective, in the context of neoliberalism and multiculturalism. One of these directions is to study the rise of Indigenous capital. A second is to compare the way that transnational, Indigenous and migrant cultures challenge the national habitus. A third invites researchers to compare more systematically gendered practices across fields and countries, a study that should be supplemented by the impact of the feminisation of cultural intermediaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"310 - 317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833221146793\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833221146793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇关于Fields,Capitals,Habitus的评论文章首先讨论了这种对澳大利亚生活方式和文化实践的深入调查如何有助于布迪厄《与众不同》的出版和翻译引发的丰富讨论。然后,它转向了这项调查开辟的研究方向,特别是在新自由主义和多元文化背景下的比较视角。其中一个方向是研究土著资本的兴起。第二个是比较跨国、土著和移民文化挑战民族习惯的方式。第三项研究邀请研究人员更系统地比较各个领域和国家的性别做法,这项研究应该辅以文化中介女性化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The metamorphoses of cultural capital in a neoliberal and multicultural era: Towards a comparative approach
This review essay of Fields, Capitals, Habitus first discusses how this in-depth inquiry into the lifestyles and cultural practices in Australia contributes to the rich discussions sparked by the publication and translation of Bourdieu's Distinction. It then turns to research directions that this survey opens up, especially in comparative perspective, in the context of neoliberalism and multiculturalism. One of these directions is to study the rise of Indigenous capital. A second is to compare the way that transnational, Indigenous and migrant cultures challenge the national habitus. A third invites researchers to compare more systematically gendered practices across fields and countries, a study that should be supplemented by the impact of the feminisation of cultural intermediaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sociology is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信