重访元心理学、精神病理学和神经精神分析中的发展问题

Q3 Psychology
Iftah Biran, Co-editor, Richard Kessler, Co-editor, David Olds, Target Articles Editor, Daniela Flores Mosri, Managing Editor
{"title":"重访元心理学、精神病理学和神经精神分析中的发展问题","authors":"Iftah Biran, Co-editor, Richard Kessler, Co-editor, David Olds, Target Articles Editor, Daniela Flores Mosri, Managing Editor","doi":"10.1080/15294145.2021.2005670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue of Neuropsychoanalysis, three original articles cover topics that range from metapsychological concepts to novel perspectives on psychopathology. Readers will find much to contemplate: nuanced explorations of several recent neuroscience models that have stimulated lots of neuropsychoanalytic ideas, such as the free energy principle, the default mode network and the basic emotion systems; and original research on the development of the basic mother-infant relationship, which adds to the literature on that topic with a rich qualitative perspective. If there were any doubts about the role Freudian metapsychology would play in the new discipline of neuropsychoanalysis, one would be well advised to look to this journal’s very first edition, featuring the article “Affect and the Integration Problem of Mind and Brain” (1999), by the master metapsychologist Barry Opatow. That brilliant offering foreshadowed metapsychology’s placement as the bridge between mind and brain. Over the years, highly profitable metapsychological explorations of dreams, consciousness, drive theory and defenses ensued. Still, perhaps nothing could rival the neuropsychoanalytic generativity of Karl Friston’s theories about free energy and predictive coding. This leading neuroscientist of the modern era (Bohannon, 2016), in his 2010 article “The Default-mode, Ego-functions and Free-energy: A Neurobiological Account of Freudian Ideas,” co-authored with Robin Carhart-Harris (Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2010), ushered in a renewed appreciation of the significance of Freud’s economic metapsychological perspective. His collaboration with Mark Solms eventually led to the Solms’ landmark reworking of Freud’s Project, “New Project for a Scientific Psychology,” which we published last year (Solms, 2020). Adding to that developing literature, in this current issue we are offered two articles inspired by Friston’s revolutionary neuroscientific work and grounded in psychoanalytic principles. Novac and Blinder’s “Free Association in Psychoanalysis and its Links to Neuroscience Contributions” presents an encyclopedic review of the evolution of this fundamental psychoanalytic concept and establishes it as a unique process amidst other types of spontaneous thought, such as mind wandering and meditation. It is “examined in the light of the literature on free energy, predictive coding, error prediction, and down-regulation of the default mode network.” This view establishes it not only as a psychoanalytic technique, but as a “fundamental mental state linked to the creation of novel and adaptive memory paradigms.” Fabio Thá, Eduardo Buatim Nion da Silveira, and Tiago Buatim Nion da Silveira’s “The Hysterical Symptom: A proposal of the articulation of the Freudian theory and the Bayesian Account”, which builds on Michael’s 2018 article in Neuropsychoanalysis, “On the Scientific Prospects for Freud’s Theory of Hysteria” is even more directly indebted to Friston’s work. Freud’s case history of Elisabeth von R is revisited and brought to life. Her symptoms are explained via a masterful bending of three aspects of pathogenesis, i.e., the displacement of the affective charge of a psychic conflict onto a symbol, the conceptual blending of the metaphor which links the symptom and the conflict, and the neurocomputational conferring of excessively attentive precision on the somatic complaint. Novac and Blinder suggest that the neuroscience literature “may serve to stimulate renewed interest in FA;” in a similar spirit, Thá, Nion da Silveira and Nion da Silveira assert that the interplay of free energy neuroscience and psychoanalysis engenders a creative synthesis, and that the corresponding articulations of symbolic and neuroscientific readings are complementary as well as mutually clarifying. The Editors happily agree with both sentiments. Psychoanalysis has long been interested in early developmental issues and in the mother-baby dyad. These have occupied, among others, the thinking of","PeriodicalId":39493,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychoanalysis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting metapsychology, psychopathology, and developmental issues in neuropsychoanalysis\",\"authors\":\"Iftah Biran, Co-editor, Richard Kessler, Co-editor, David Olds, Target Articles Editor, Daniela Flores Mosri, Managing Editor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15294145.2021.2005670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this issue of Neuropsychoanalysis, three original articles cover topics that range from metapsychological concepts to novel perspectives on psychopathology. Readers will find much to contemplate: nuanced explorations of several recent neuroscience models that have stimulated lots of neuropsychoanalytic ideas, such as the free energy principle, the default mode network and the basic emotion systems; and original research on the development of the basic mother-infant relationship, which adds to the literature on that topic with a rich qualitative perspective. If there were any doubts about the role Freudian metapsychology would play in the new discipline of neuropsychoanalysis, one would be well advised to look to this journal’s very first edition, featuring the article “Affect and the Integration Problem of Mind and Brain” (1999), by the master metapsychologist Barry Opatow. That brilliant offering foreshadowed metapsychology’s placement as the bridge between mind and brain. Over the years, highly profitable metapsychological explorations of dreams, consciousness, drive theory and defenses ensued. Still, perhaps nothing could rival the neuropsychoanalytic generativity of Karl Friston’s theories about free energy and predictive coding. This leading neuroscientist of the modern era (Bohannon, 2016), in his 2010 article “The Default-mode, Ego-functions and Free-energy: A Neurobiological Account of Freudian Ideas,” co-authored with Robin Carhart-Harris (Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2010), ushered in a renewed appreciation of the significance of Freud’s economic metapsychological perspective. His collaboration with Mark Solms eventually led to the Solms’ landmark reworking of Freud’s Project, “New Project for a Scientific Psychology,” which we published last year (Solms, 2020). Adding to that developing literature, in this current issue we are offered two articles inspired by Friston’s revolutionary neuroscientific work and grounded in psychoanalytic principles. Novac and Blinder’s “Free Association in Psychoanalysis and its Links to Neuroscience Contributions” presents an encyclopedic review of the evolution of this fundamental psychoanalytic concept and establishes it as a unique process amidst other types of spontaneous thought, such as mind wandering and meditation. It is “examined in the light of the literature on free energy, predictive coding, error prediction, and down-regulation of the default mode network.” This view establishes it not only as a psychoanalytic technique, but as a “fundamental mental state linked to the creation of novel and adaptive memory paradigms.” Fabio Thá, Eduardo Buatim Nion da Silveira, and Tiago Buatim Nion da Silveira’s “The Hysterical Symptom: A proposal of the articulation of the Freudian theory and the Bayesian Account”, which builds on Michael’s 2018 article in Neuropsychoanalysis, “On the Scientific Prospects for Freud’s Theory of Hysteria” is even more directly indebted to Friston’s work. Freud’s case history of Elisabeth von R is revisited and brought to life. Her symptoms are explained via a masterful bending of three aspects of pathogenesis, i.e., the displacement of the affective charge of a psychic conflict onto a symbol, the conceptual blending of the metaphor which links the symptom and the conflict, and the neurocomputational conferring of excessively attentive precision on the somatic complaint. Novac and Blinder suggest that the neuroscience literature “may serve to stimulate renewed interest in FA;” in a similar spirit, Thá, Nion da Silveira and Nion da Silveira assert that the interplay of free energy neuroscience and psychoanalysis engenders a creative synthesis, and that the corresponding articulations of symbolic and neuroscientific readings are complementary as well as mutually clarifying. The Editors happily agree with both sentiments. Psychoanalysis has long been interested in early developmental issues and in the mother-baby dyad. These have occupied, among others, the thinking of\",\"PeriodicalId\":39493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2021.2005670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2021.2005670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本期《神经精神分析》中,三篇原创文章涵盖了从元心理学概念到精神病理学新视角的主题。读者将会发现很多值得思考的地方:对几个最近激发了许多神经精神分析思想的神经科学模型进行细致入微的探索,比如自由能原理、默认模式网络和基本情感系统;以及对基本母婴关系发展的原创性研究,为该主题的文献提供了丰富的定性视角。如果对弗洛伊德的元心理学在神经精神分析的新学科中所扮演的角色有任何疑问,那么最好去看看这本杂志的第一版,它的特色文章是《情感和精神与大脑的整合问题》(1999),作者是元心理学大师巴里·奥帕托。这一杰出的成果预示了元心理学作为心智和大脑之间桥梁的地位。多年来,对梦、意识、驱力理论和防御的高收益的元心理学探索随之而来。尽管如此,或许没有什么能与卡尔·弗里斯顿(Karl Friston)关于自由能和预测编码的神经精神分析生成理论相媲美。这位现代领先的神经科学家(Bohannon, 2016)在他2010年与Robin Carhart-Harris (Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2010)合著的文章《默认模式、自我功能和自由能量:弗洛伊德思想的神经生物学解释》中,重新认识了弗洛伊德经济元心理学观点的重要性。他与马克·索姆斯(Mark Solms)的合作最终导致索姆斯对弗洛伊德的项目进行了里程碑式的改造,“科学心理学的新项目”,我们去年发表了这篇文章(索姆斯,2020)。除了不断发展的文献之外,本期我们还将看到两篇受弗里斯顿革命性神经科学工作启发、以精神分析原理为基础的文章。Novac和Blinder的《精神分析中的自由联想及其与神经科学贡献的联系》对这一基本精神分析概念的演变进行了百科全书式的回顾,并将其确立为其他类型的自发思维(如走神和冥想)中的独特过程。它“在自由能、预测编码、误差预测和默认模式网络下调的文献中进行了检查。”这一观点不仅将其确立为一种精神分析技术,而且将其视为一种“与创造新颖和适应性记忆范式相关的基本精神状态”。Fabio th、Eduardo Buatim Nion da Silveira和Tiago Buatim Nion da Silveira的《歇斯底里症状:弗洛伊德理论和贝叶斯解释的表述建议》,以Michael 2018年在《神经精神分析》上的文章《弗洛伊德歇斯底里理论的科学前景》为基础,更直接地得益于弗里斯顿的工作。弗洛伊德的伊丽莎白·冯·R的病例历史被重新审视并带来了生活。她的症状是通过对发病机制的三个方面的巧妙的弯曲来解释的,即,将精神冲突的情感负荷转移到符号上,将症状和冲突联系起来的隐喻的概念混合,以及神经计算赋予对躯体抱怨的过度关注的精确。Novac和Blinder认为,神经科学文献“可能有助于激发人们对FA的新兴趣”;本着类似的精神,th、Nion da Silveira和Nion da Silveira断言,自由能量神经科学和精神分析的相互作用产生了一种创造性的综合,符号和神经科学解读的相应表达是互补的,也是相互澄清的。编辑们很高兴地同意这两种观点。长期以来,精神分析一直对早期发育问题和母婴死亡感兴趣。这些问题占据了人们的思考
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting metapsychology, psychopathology, and developmental issues in neuropsychoanalysis
In this issue of Neuropsychoanalysis, three original articles cover topics that range from metapsychological concepts to novel perspectives on psychopathology. Readers will find much to contemplate: nuanced explorations of several recent neuroscience models that have stimulated lots of neuropsychoanalytic ideas, such as the free energy principle, the default mode network and the basic emotion systems; and original research on the development of the basic mother-infant relationship, which adds to the literature on that topic with a rich qualitative perspective. If there were any doubts about the role Freudian metapsychology would play in the new discipline of neuropsychoanalysis, one would be well advised to look to this journal’s very first edition, featuring the article “Affect and the Integration Problem of Mind and Brain” (1999), by the master metapsychologist Barry Opatow. That brilliant offering foreshadowed metapsychology’s placement as the bridge between mind and brain. Over the years, highly profitable metapsychological explorations of dreams, consciousness, drive theory and defenses ensued. Still, perhaps nothing could rival the neuropsychoanalytic generativity of Karl Friston’s theories about free energy and predictive coding. This leading neuroscientist of the modern era (Bohannon, 2016), in his 2010 article “The Default-mode, Ego-functions and Free-energy: A Neurobiological Account of Freudian Ideas,” co-authored with Robin Carhart-Harris (Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2010), ushered in a renewed appreciation of the significance of Freud’s economic metapsychological perspective. His collaboration with Mark Solms eventually led to the Solms’ landmark reworking of Freud’s Project, “New Project for a Scientific Psychology,” which we published last year (Solms, 2020). Adding to that developing literature, in this current issue we are offered two articles inspired by Friston’s revolutionary neuroscientific work and grounded in psychoanalytic principles. Novac and Blinder’s “Free Association in Psychoanalysis and its Links to Neuroscience Contributions” presents an encyclopedic review of the evolution of this fundamental psychoanalytic concept and establishes it as a unique process amidst other types of spontaneous thought, such as mind wandering and meditation. It is “examined in the light of the literature on free energy, predictive coding, error prediction, and down-regulation of the default mode network.” This view establishes it not only as a psychoanalytic technique, but as a “fundamental mental state linked to the creation of novel and adaptive memory paradigms.” Fabio Thá, Eduardo Buatim Nion da Silveira, and Tiago Buatim Nion da Silveira’s “The Hysterical Symptom: A proposal of the articulation of the Freudian theory and the Bayesian Account”, which builds on Michael’s 2018 article in Neuropsychoanalysis, “On the Scientific Prospects for Freud’s Theory of Hysteria” is even more directly indebted to Friston’s work. Freud’s case history of Elisabeth von R is revisited and brought to life. Her symptoms are explained via a masterful bending of three aspects of pathogenesis, i.e., the displacement of the affective charge of a psychic conflict onto a symbol, the conceptual blending of the metaphor which links the symptom and the conflict, and the neurocomputational conferring of excessively attentive precision on the somatic complaint. Novac and Blinder suggest that the neuroscience literature “may serve to stimulate renewed interest in FA;” in a similar spirit, Thá, Nion da Silveira and Nion da Silveira assert that the interplay of free energy neuroscience and psychoanalysis engenders a creative synthesis, and that the corresponding articulations of symbolic and neuroscientific readings are complementary as well as mutually clarifying. The Editors happily agree with both sentiments. Psychoanalysis has long been interested in early developmental issues and in the mother-baby dyad. These have occupied, among others, the thinking of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychoanalysis
Neuropsychoanalysis Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信