《天主教圣公会遗产》特蕾西·罗兰主编(评论)

IF 0.1 N/A RELIGION
S. Morgan
{"title":"《天主教圣公会遗产》特蕾西·罗兰主编(评论)","authors":"S. Morgan","doi":"10.1353/atp.2021.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"known as the Orange, Grey, and Green books, and all seeking in their way to influence the final official proposal—is an area ripe for study, especially considering the adoption (and rejection) of certain elements of those drafts in Anglican liturgical texts in later years. Cruickshank seems to think these were more party manifestos than evidence of distinct theological schools (73–74). This may or may not be true, but there is little here from which to draw such a conclusion. There is also an understandable focus on the proposed revision of the Communion Service, but at the detriment of any real engagement with the revised Offices, including the novel insertion of Prime and Compline in the Prayer Book Office, which the final 1927/8 draft achieved. This is a helpful and concise guide to the subject, which brings to light archive material which has, until now, been unknown. Although typically expensive for a monograph, especially one this short, those interested in the development of Anglican liturgy will undoubtedly benefit from its pages.","PeriodicalId":40281,"journal":{"name":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anglican Patrimony in Catholic Communion ed. by Tracey Rowland (review)\",\"authors\":\"S. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/atp.2021.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"known as the Orange, Grey, and Green books, and all seeking in their way to influence the final official proposal—is an area ripe for study, especially considering the adoption (and rejection) of certain elements of those drafts in Anglican liturgical texts in later years. Cruickshank seems to think these were more party manifestos than evidence of distinct theological schools (73–74). This may or may not be true, but there is little here from which to draw such a conclusion. There is also an understandable focus on the proposed revision of the Communion Service, but at the detriment of any real engagement with the revised Offices, including the novel insertion of Prime and Compline in the Prayer Book Office, which the final 1927/8 draft achieved. This is a helpful and concise guide to the subject, which brings to light archive material which has, until now, been unknown. Although typically expensive for a monograph, especially one this short, those interested in the development of Anglican liturgy will undoubtedly benefit from its pages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2021.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2021.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被称为橙色、灰色和绿色书籍,所有这些书籍都试图以自己的方式影响最终的官方提案,这是一个成熟的研究领域,尤其是考虑到这些草案中的某些元素在未来几年英国圣公会礼仪文本中被采纳(和拒绝)。克鲁克申克似乎认为这些更多的是政党宣言,而不是不同神学流派的证据(73–74)。这可能是真的,也可能不是真的,但这里几乎没有什么可以得出这样的结论。可以理解的是,人们也将重点放在了对圣餐服务的拟议修订上,但这损害了与修订后的办公室的任何实际接触,包括在祈祷书办公室中新颖地插入了Prime和Compline,这是1927/8年的最终草案所实现的。这是一本有用而简洁的主题指南,揭示了迄今为止不为人知的档案材料。尽管一本专著通常很贵,尤其是这么短的一本,但那些对圣公会礼拜仪式发展感兴趣的人无疑会从它的页面中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Anglican Patrimony in Catholic Communion ed. by Tracey Rowland (review)
known as the Orange, Grey, and Green books, and all seeking in their way to influence the final official proposal—is an area ripe for study, especially considering the adoption (and rejection) of certain elements of those drafts in Anglican liturgical texts in later years. Cruickshank seems to think these were more party manifestos than evidence of distinct theological schools (73–74). This may or may not be true, but there is little here from which to draw such a conclusion. There is also an understandable focus on the proposed revision of the Communion Service, but at the detriment of any real engagement with the revised Offices, including the novel insertion of Prime and Compline in the Prayer Book Office, which the final 1927/8 draft achieved. This is a helpful and concise guide to the subject, which brings to light archive material which has, until now, been unknown. Although typically expensive for a monograph, especially one this short, those interested in the development of Anglican liturgy will undoubtedly benefit from its pages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信