H. Kobe, A. Ito, Yosuke Nakanishi, A. Kuriyama, H. Tachibana, T. Ishida
{"title":"与标准治疗相比,Baricitinib加入COVID-19治疗不会增加细菌感染:一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"H. Kobe, A. Ito, Yosuke Nakanishi, A. Kuriyama, H. Tachibana, T. Ishida","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.9534-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world, and the utility of many drugs for treatment has been suggested. However, few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of treatment with baricitinib, remdesivir, and dexamethasone. Methods A retrospective, cohort study of patients who were admitted to Kurashiki Central Hospital in Japan between April 6 and June 29, 2021, was conducted. Differences in patients' background characteristics, clinical outcomes, and safety were investigated in the groups with and without baricitinib treatment. The primary outcome was the bacterial infection rate, and the secondary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, including 12 covariates, was used as a propensity score analysis to reduce biases. Results In total, there were 96 patients, including 43 in the baricitinib-containing therapy (BCT) group and 53 in the non-baricitinib-containing therapy (non-BCT) group. In the BCT group, the ordinal scale on admission was 2.3% with 4, 51.1% with 5, 23.3% with 6, and 23.3% with 7. In the non-BCT group, the ordinal scale was 1.9% with 3, 18.9% with 4, 58.5% with 5, 13.2% with 6, and 7.5% with 7. After adjusting by the IPTW analysis, the BCT group did not have an increased bacterial infection rate [odds ratio (OR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-3.38; p=0.87] or 28-day mortality rate (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.07-1.3; p=0.11) compared with the non-BCT group. Conclusion BCT can be administered without increasing the infection risk compared with non-BCT.","PeriodicalId":77259,"journal":{"name":"Medicina interna (Bucharest, Romania : 1991)","volume":"61 1","pages":"2273 - 2279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of Baricitinib to COVID-19 Treatment Does Not Increase Bacterial Infection Compared to Standard Therapy: A Single-center Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"H. Kobe, A. Ito, Yosuke Nakanishi, A. Kuriyama, H. Tachibana, T. Ishida\",\"doi\":\"10.2169/internalmedicine.9534-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world, and the utility of many drugs for treatment has been suggested. However, few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of treatment with baricitinib, remdesivir, and dexamethasone. Methods A retrospective, cohort study of patients who were admitted to Kurashiki Central Hospital in Japan between April 6 and June 29, 2021, was conducted. Differences in patients' background characteristics, clinical outcomes, and safety were investigated in the groups with and without baricitinib treatment. The primary outcome was the bacterial infection rate, and the secondary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, including 12 covariates, was used as a propensity score analysis to reduce biases. Results In total, there were 96 patients, including 43 in the baricitinib-containing therapy (BCT) group and 53 in the non-baricitinib-containing therapy (non-BCT) group. In the BCT group, the ordinal scale on admission was 2.3% with 4, 51.1% with 5, 23.3% with 6, and 23.3% with 7. In the non-BCT group, the ordinal scale was 1.9% with 3, 18.9% with 4, 58.5% with 5, 13.2% with 6, and 7.5% with 7. After adjusting by the IPTW analysis, the BCT group did not have an increased bacterial infection rate [odds ratio (OR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-3.38; p=0.87] or 28-day mortality rate (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.07-1.3; p=0.11) compared with the non-BCT group. Conclusion BCT can be administered without increasing the infection risk compared with non-BCT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina interna (Bucharest, Romania : 1991)\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"2273 - 2279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina interna (Bucharest, Romania : 1991)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9534-22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina interna (Bucharest, Romania : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9534-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在全球范围内持续蔓延,并建议使用多种药物进行治疗。然而,很少有研究考察巴比替尼、瑞德西韦和地塞米松治疗的有效性和安全性。方法对2021年4月6日至6月29日在日本仓市中心医院(Kurashiki Central Hospital)住院的患者进行回顾性队列研究。在接受和未接受巴西替尼治疗的组中,研究了患者背景特征、临床结果和安全性的差异。主要转归是细菌感染率,次要转归是28天死亡率。采用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)分析,包括12个协变量,作为倾向评分分析以减少偏倚。结果96例患者,含巴比替尼治疗组(BCT) 43例,不含巴比替尼治疗组(non-BCT) 53例。BCT组入院时的平均评分为:2.3%(4)、51.1%(5)、23.3%(6)、23.3%(7)。非bct组依次为3组1.9%,4组18.9%,5组58.5%,6组13.2%,7组7.5%。经IPTW分析调整后,BCT组细菌感染率没有增加[优势比(OR), 1.1;95%置信区间(CI), 0.36-3.38;p=0.87]或28天死亡率(or, 0.31;95% ci, 0.07-1.3;p=0.11)。结论与未行BCT相比,行BCT治疗不增加感染风险。
Addition of Baricitinib to COVID-19 Treatment Does Not Increase Bacterial Infection Compared to Standard Therapy: A Single-center Retrospective Study
Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world, and the utility of many drugs for treatment has been suggested. However, few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of treatment with baricitinib, remdesivir, and dexamethasone. Methods A retrospective, cohort study of patients who were admitted to Kurashiki Central Hospital in Japan between April 6 and June 29, 2021, was conducted. Differences in patients' background characteristics, clinical outcomes, and safety were investigated in the groups with and without baricitinib treatment. The primary outcome was the bacterial infection rate, and the secondary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, including 12 covariates, was used as a propensity score analysis to reduce biases. Results In total, there were 96 patients, including 43 in the baricitinib-containing therapy (BCT) group and 53 in the non-baricitinib-containing therapy (non-BCT) group. In the BCT group, the ordinal scale on admission was 2.3% with 4, 51.1% with 5, 23.3% with 6, and 23.3% with 7. In the non-BCT group, the ordinal scale was 1.9% with 3, 18.9% with 4, 58.5% with 5, 13.2% with 6, and 7.5% with 7. After adjusting by the IPTW analysis, the BCT group did not have an increased bacterial infection rate [odds ratio (OR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-3.38; p=0.87] or 28-day mortality rate (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.07-1.3; p=0.11) compared with the non-BCT group. Conclusion BCT can be administered without increasing the infection risk compared with non-BCT.