父母在用餐时间与孩子进行辩论对话的策略

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Language and Dialogue Pub Date : 2019-10-29 DOI:10.1075/ld.00048.bov

A. Bova

{"title":"父母在用餐时间与孩子进行辩论对话的策略","authors":"A. Bova","doi":"10.1075/ld.00048.bov","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study focuses on parent-child argumentation to identify the argumentative strategies most frequently used by\n parents to resolve in their favor the process of negotiation occurring during argumentative dialogues with their children at\n mealtime. Findings of the analysis of 132 argumentative dialogues indicate that parents mostly use arguments based on the notions\n of quality and quantity in food-related discussions. The parents use other types of arguments such as the appeal to consistency,\n the arguments from authority, and the arguments from analogy, in discussions related to the teaching of correct behaviors in\n social situations within and outside the family context. The results of this study show how parents and children contribute to\n co-constructing the dialogic process of negotiating their divergent opinions.","PeriodicalId":42318,"journal":{"name":"Language and Dialogue","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental strategies in argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtimes\",\"authors\":\"A. Bova\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ld.00048.bov\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study focuses on parent-child argumentation to identify the argumentative strategies most frequently used by\\n parents to resolve in their favor the process of negotiation occurring during argumentative dialogues with their children at\\n mealtime. Findings of the analysis of 132 argumentative dialogues indicate that parents mostly use arguments based on the notions\\n of quality and quantity in food-related discussions. The parents use other types of arguments such as the appeal to consistency,\\n the arguments from authority, and the arguments from analogy, in discussions related to the teaching of correct behaviors in\\n social situations within and outside the family context. The results of this study show how parents and children contribute to\\n co-constructing the dialogic process of negotiating their divergent opinions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00048.bov\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00048.bov","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的重点是亲子辩论，以确定父母最常用的辩论策略，以解决他们在用餐时间与孩子进行辩论对话时的谈判过程。对132个争论性对话的分析结果表明，在与食物有关的讨论中，父母主要使用基于质量和数量概念的争论。在讨论与家庭内外的社会环境中正确行为的教学有关的问题时，父母使用其他类型的论点，如呼吁一致性，权威论点和类比论点。本研究的结果显示了父母和孩子如何共同构建协商他们不同意见的对话过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Parental strategies in argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtimes

This study focuses on parent-child argumentation to identify the argumentative strategies most frequently used by parents to resolve in their favor the process of negotiation occurring during argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtime. Findings of the analysis of 132 argumentative dialogues indicate that parents mostly use arguments based on the notions of quality and quantity in food-related discussions. The parents use other types of arguments such as the appeal to consistency, the arguments from authority, and the arguments from analogy, in discussions related to the teaching of correct behaviors in social situations within and outside the family context. The results of this study show how parents and children contribute to co-constructing the dialogic process of negotiating their divergent opinions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language and Dialogue LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.