{"title":"《正义杀戮的政治:网络中的公民社会、性别和性》,西玛·沙赫萨里著(综述)","authors":"D. Alinejad","doi":"10.1353/anq.2021.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"W each popular protest in Iran that makes international headlines, questions about a fissure between Iranian people and the Iranian state reemerge with new force in Western media narratives and policy discussions. Over the past two decades, the role of digital communications platforms in fostering such a fissure has received particular attention. However, claims about the internet’s role have often been informed by bloated techno-utopian hopes, and less grounded in knowledge about Iranians’ digital media practices. Sima Shakhsari’s book, Politics of Rightful Killing, offers a powerful corrective to assumptions about Iran’s web users being a uniform set of political dissidents. Instead, Shakhsari shows us how the Iranian blogosphere constitutes a multifarious communicative space featuring a range of internal political clashes as well as its own dynamics of exclusion, control, and bigotry—often along lines of gender and sexuality. The book draws on ethnographic material elicited through Shakhsari’s participant observation as a long-time blogger in Weblogistan, a term used for the Persian language blogosphere (literally meaning land of weblogs). Alongside the observational material, the analysis foregrounds interviews with key Iranian bloggers the author met in varied diaspora locations. As such, Shakhsari’s discussion is able to seamlessly weave analysis of blog texts and images together with the social dynamics behind their production and the political contexts of their reception. This is the basis on which she makes a convincing case for understanding the thriving Iranian blogosphere of the early 2000s as a significant but vulnerable site of international contestation over the meaning of Iranian","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":"94 1","pages":"755 - 758"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics of Rightful Killing: Civil Society, Gender, and Sexuality in Weblogistan by Sima Shakhsari (review)\",\"authors\":\"D. Alinejad\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/anq.2021.0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"W each popular protest in Iran that makes international headlines, questions about a fissure between Iranian people and the Iranian state reemerge with new force in Western media narratives and policy discussions. Over the past two decades, the role of digital communications platforms in fostering such a fissure has received particular attention. However, claims about the internet’s role have often been informed by bloated techno-utopian hopes, and less grounded in knowledge about Iranians’ digital media practices. Sima Shakhsari’s book, Politics of Rightful Killing, offers a powerful corrective to assumptions about Iran’s web users being a uniform set of political dissidents. Instead, Shakhsari shows us how the Iranian blogosphere constitutes a multifarious communicative space featuring a range of internal political clashes as well as its own dynamics of exclusion, control, and bigotry—often along lines of gender and sexuality. The book draws on ethnographic material elicited through Shakhsari’s participant observation as a long-time blogger in Weblogistan, a term used for the Persian language blogosphere (literally meaning land of weblogs). Alongside the observational material, the analysis foregrounds interviews with key Iranian bloggers the author met in varied diaspora locations. As such, Shakhsari’s discussion is able to seamlessly weave analysis of blog texts and images together with the social dynamics behind their production and the political contexts of their reception. This is the basis on which she makes a convincing case for understanding the thriving Iranian blogosphere of the early 2000s as a significant but vulnerable site of international contestation over the meaning of Iranian\",\"PeriodicalId\":51536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"755 - 758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2021.0036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2021.0036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
每当伊朗的民众抗议活动成为国际头条新闻时,关于伊朗人民和伊朗国家之间裂痕的问题都会在西方媒体的报道和政策讨论中重新出现。在过去的二十年里,数字通信平台在助长这种裂痕方面的作用受到了特别关注。然而,关于互联网作用的说法往往是基于膨胀的技术乌托邦希望,而不是基于对伊朗数字媒体实践的了解。西玛·沙赫萨里(Sima Shakhsari)的著作《正义杀戮的政治》(Politics of Rightful Killing)有力地纠正了人们对伊朗网络用户是一群统一的政治异见人士的假设。相反,Shakhsari向我们展示了伊朗博客圈是如何构成一个多样化的交流空间的,其特点是一系列内部政治冲突,以及其自身的排斥、控制和偏执——通常是基于性别和性取向。这本书借鉴了Shakhsari作为Weblogistan(波斯语博客圈,字面意思是博客之地)的长期博主的参与者观察所得出的民族志材料。除了观察材料外,该分析还预测了作者在不同散居地遇到的伊朗主要博主的采访。因此,Shakhsari的讨论能够无缝地将博客文本和图像的分析与它们的制作背后的社会动态和接受它们的政治背景交织在一起。这是她提出令人信服的理由来理解21世纪初蓬勃发展的伊朗博客圈的基础,它是一个重要但脆弱的国际争论伊朗含义的网站
Politics of Rightful Killing: Civil Society, Gender, and Sexuality in Weblogistan by Sima Shakhsari (review)
W each popular protest in Iran that makes international headlines, questions about a fissure between Iranian people and the Iranian state reemerge with new force in Western media narratives and policy discussions. Over the past two decades, the role of digital communications platforms in fostering such a fissure has received particular attention. However, claims about the internet’s role have often been informed by bloated techno-utopian hopes, and less grounded in knowledge about Iranians’ digital media practices. Sima Shakhsari’s book, Politics of Rightful Killing, offers a powerful corrective to assumptions about Iran’s web users being a uniform set of political dissidents. Instead, Shakhsari shows us how the Iranian blogosphere constitutes a multifarious communicative space featuring a range of internal political clashes as well as its own dynamics of exclusion, control, and bigotry—often along lines of gender and sexuality. The book draws on ethnographic material elicited through Shakhsari’s participant observation as a long-time blogger in Weblogistan, a term used for the Persian language blogosphere (literally meaning land of weblogs). Alongside the observational material, the analysis foregrounds interviews with key Iranian bloggers the author met in varied diaspora locations. As such, Shakhsari’s discussion is able to seamlessly weave analysis of blog texts and images together with the social dynamics behind their production and the political contexts of their reception. This is the basis on which she makes a convincing case for understanding the thriving Iranian blogosphere of the early 2000s as a significant but vulnerable site of international contestation over the meaning of Iranian
期刊介绍:
Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.