科学素养的基础:对科学教师教育方案的建议

Susan Bruna Carneiro Aragão, M. R. Marcondes
{"title":"科学素养的基础:对科学教师教育方案的建议","authors":"Susan Bruna Carneiro Aragão, M. R. Marcondes","doi":"10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific Literacy (SL) is a term used in many countries to define the purpose of science education. Although there is no consensus in defining it, many authors argue that SL is the main goal for science education. Based on author's previous research that established three fundamentals of SL that can develop students’ scientific literacy, the approaches: Inquiry-based Teaching (IBT), Science-TechnologySociety (STS), and History and Philosophy of Science (HPS), an academic discipline in a teacher education program was investigated in order to analyze pre-service teachers' conceptions about SL and its fundamentals. The research objective was investigated how pre-service teachers understand and reflect on the SL concept and its fundamentals. This proposal was applied in a Brazilian Federal University located in the metropolitan area of São Paulo-Brazil. Twelve pre-service teachers attended the seventeen classes. They studied three different approaches: STS, HPS, and IBT. Some aspects of Nature of Science were also considered. Researchers authors elaborated levels of comprehension for each approach in order to analyze pre-service teachers’ conceptions. The primary results so far indicated that some students were able to establish relationships among these approaches and their comprehension of each approach was dependent on the emphasis of the teacher educator.","PeriodicalId":90007,"journal":{"name":"Literacy information and computer education journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundamentals of Scientific Literacy: A Proposal for Science Teacher Education Program\",\"authors\":\"Susan Bruna Carneiro Aragão, M. R. Marcondes\",\"doi\":\"10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific Literacy (SL) is a term used in many countries to define the purpose of science education. Although there is no consensus in defining it, many authors argue that SL is the main goal for science education. Based on author's previous research that established three fundamentals of SL that can develop students’ scientific literacy, the approaches: Inquiry-based Teaching (IBT), Science-TechnologySociety (STS), and History and Philosophy of Science (HPS), an academic discipline in a teacher education program was investigated in order to analyze pre-service teachers' conceptions about SL and its fundamentals. The research objective was investigated how pre-service teachers understand and reflect on the SL concept and its fundamentals. This proposal was applied in a Brazilian Federal University located in the metropolitan area of São Paulo-Brazil. Twelve pre-service teachers attended the seventeen classes. They studied three different approaches: STS, HPS, and IBT. Some aspects of Nature of Science were also considered. Researchers authors elaborated levels of comprehension for each approach in order to analyze pre-service teachers’ conceptions. The primary results so far indicated that some students were able to establish relationships among these approaches and their comprehension of each approach was dependent on the emphasis of the teacher educator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literacy information and computer education journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literacy information and computer education journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy information and computer education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

科学素养(science Literacy, SL)是许多国家用来定义科学教育目的的术语。虽然在定义上没有达成共识,但许多作者认为SL是科学教育的主要目标。本文在作者建立了培养学生科学素养的三个基础的基础上,通过探究性教学(IBT)、科学-技术社会(STS)和科学历史与哲学(HPS)这三种教师教育学科的方法,分析了职前教师对科学素养及其基础的概念。研究目的是调查职前教师如何理解和反思SL概念及其基本原理。这一建议在位于巴西圣保罗市区的巴西联邦大学得到了应用。12名职前教师参加了这17堂课。他们研究了三种不同的方法:STS、HPS和IBT。还考虑了《科学的本质》的某些方面。研究人员详细阐述了每种方法的理解水平,以分析职前教师的概念。到目前为止的初步结果表明,一些学生能够建立这些方法之间的关系,他们对每种方法的理解取决于教师教育的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fundamentals of Scientific Literacy: A Proposal for Science Teacher Education Program
Scientific Literacy (SL) is a term used in many countries to define the purpose of science education. Although there is no consensus in defining it, many authors argue that SL is the main goal for science education. Based on author's previous research that established three fundamentals of SL that can develop students’ scientific literacy, the approaches: Inquiry-based Teaching (IBT), Science-TechnologySociety (STS), and History and Philosophy of Science (HPS), an academic discipline in a teacher education program was investigated in order to analyze pre-service teachers' conceptions about SL and its fundamentals. The research objective was investigated how pre-service teachers understand and reflect on the SL concept and its fundamentals. This proposal was applied in a Brazilian Federal University located in the metropolitan area of São Paulo-Brazil. Twelve pre-service teachers attended the seventeen classes. They studied three different approaches: STS, HPS, and IBT. Some aspects of Nature of Science were also considered. Researchers authors elaborated levels of comprehension for each approach in order to analyze pre-service teachers’ conceptions. The primary results so far indicated that some students were able to establish relationships among these approaches and their comprehension of each approach was dependent on the emphasis of the teacher educator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信