{"title":"华兹华斯与雪莱诗歌的崇高","authors":"Andrej Gregus","doi":"10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I present two contrasting perspectives on the ‘sublime’ in Romantic poetry: that of Percy Bysshe Shelley, who viewed sublimity as something from above which is up to the poets to interpret; and that of William Wordsworth, who viewed sublimity as something from within that needs only to be discovered. Despite these philosophical differences, both poets rely on figures of language to convey the paradoxes and circularities that invariably characterize the notion of sublimity. I conclude that this leads to a focalization of language itself as an instrument of the sublime; in effect, the language of sublimity becomes a kind of sublime rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":41387,"journal":{"name":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","volume":"35 1","pages":"100 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublimity in the Poetry of William Wordsworth and Percy Bysshe Shelley\",\"authors\":\"Andrej Gregus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT I present two contrasting perspectives on the ‘sublime’ in Romantic poetry: that of Percy Bysshe Shelley, who viewed sublimity as something from above which is up to the poets to interpret; and that of William Wordsworth, who viewed sublimity as something from within that needs only to be discovered. Despite these philosophical differences, both poets rely on figures of language to convey the paradoxes and circularities that invariably characterize the notion of sublimity. I conclude that this leads to a focalization of language itself as an instrument of the sublime; in effect, the language of sublimity becomes a kind of sublime rhetoric.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sublimity in the Poetry of William Wordsworth and Percy Bysshe Shelley
ABSTRACT I present two contrasting perspectives on the ‘sublime’ in Romantic poetry: that of Percy Bysshe Shelley, who viewed sublimity as something from above which is up to the poets to interpret; and that of William Wordsworth, who viewed sublimity as something from within that needs only to be discovered. Despite these philosophical differences, both poets rely on figures of language to convey the paradoxes and circularities that invariably characterize the notion of sublimity. I conclude that this leads to a focalization of language itself as an instrument of the sublime; in effect, the language of sublimity becomes a kind of sublime rhetoric.
期刊介绍:
The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.