华兹华斯与雪莱诗歌的崇高

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 POETRY
Andrej Gregus
{"title":"华兹华斯与雪莱诗歌的崇高","authors":"Andrej Gregus","doi":"10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I present two contrasting perspectives on the ‘sublime’ in Romantic poetry: that of Percy Bysshe Shelley, who viewed sublimity as something from above which is up to the poets to interpret; and that of William Wordsworth, who viewed sublimity as something from within that needs only to be discovered. Despite these philosophical differences, both poets rely on figures of language to convey the paradoxes and circularities that invariably characterize the notion of sublimity. I conclude that this leads to a focalization of language itself as an instrument of the sublime; in effect, the language of sublimity becomes a kind of sublime rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":41387,"journal":{"name":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","volume":"35 1","pages":"100 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublimity in the Poetry of William Wordsworth and Percy Bysshe Shelley\",\"authors\":\"Andrej Gregus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT I present two contrasting perspectives on the ‘sublime’ in Romantic poetry: that of Percy Bysshe Shelley, who viewed sublimity as something from above which is up to the poets to interpret; and that of William Wordsworth, who viewed sublimity as something from within that needs only to be discovered. Despite these philosophical differences, both poets rely on figures of language to convey the paradoxes and circularities that invariably characterize the notion of sublimity. I conclude that this leads to a focalization of language itself as an instrument of the sublime; in effect, the language of sublimity becomes a kind of sublime rhetoric.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2021.1911172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于浪漫主义诗歌中的“崇高”,我提出了两种截然不同的观点:珀西·比希·雪莱的观点,他认为崇高是一种来自上面的东西,由诗人来解释;还有威廉·华兹华斯,他认为崇高是一种来自内心的东西,只需要被发现。尽管存在这些哲学上的差异,但两位诗人都依靠语言形象来传达崇高概念的悖论和循环。我的结论是,这导致了语言本身作为崇高工具的集中;实际上,崇高的语言变成了一种崇高的修辞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sublimity in the Poetry of William Wordsworth and Percy Bysshe Shelley
ABSTRACT I present two contrasting perspectives on the ‘sublime’ in Romantic poetry: that of Percy Bysshe Shelley, who viewed sublimity as something from above which is up to the poets to interpret; and that of William Wordsworth, who viewed sublimity as something from within that needs only to be discovered. Despite these philosophical differences, both poets rely on figures of language to convey the paradoxes and circularities that invariably characterize the notion of sublimity. I conclude that this leads to a focalization of language itself as an instrument of the sublime; in effect, the language of sublimity becomes a kind of sublime rhetoric.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信