探究教师使用行为课堂干预的意向

Gwendolyn M Lawson, Julie Sarno Owens, David S Mandell, Samantha Tavlin, Steven Rufe, Thomas J Power
{"title":"探究教师使用行为课堂干预的意向","authors":"Gwendolyn M Lawson, Julie Sarno Owens, David S Mandell, Samantha Tavlin, Steven Rufe, Thomas J Power","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2023.2183434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multi-tiered systems of behavioral supports offer teachers tools to implement positive, antecedent- or consequence-based interventions for all students (i.e., Tier 1), and for those who need additional support (i.e., Tier 2), such as students with ADHD. Because these interventions may be challenging to use, targeted, theory-driven implementation strategies may assist teachers in implementing them with fidelity. This exploratory study examined teachers' intended and self-reported use of specific Tier 1 and Tier 2 behavioral classroom interventions. Sixty-five K-8 teachers from five urban public schools completed an online survey about their intentions to use and self-reported use of four Tier 1 and Tier 2 behavioral classroom interventions. Teachers' intentions varied by intervention, with the weakest intentions for using a daily behavior report (Tier 2), and weaker intentions for using high rates of specific praise than for other Tier 1 interventions. Teacher's self-reported use was significantly lower than intended use for Tier 1 interventions, but not Tier 2 interventions. Results were generally similar whether the referent group was students with ADHD symptoms or the entire class. These results suggest specific factors to target to support teachers' use of behavioral classroom interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":" ","pages":"78-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11060708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Teachers' Intentions to Use Behavioral Classroom Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Gwendolyn M Lawson, Julie Sarno Owens, David S Mandell, Samantha Tavlin, Steven Rufe, Thomas J Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23794925.2023.2183434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multi-tiered systems of behavioral supports offer teachers tools to implement positive, antecedent- or consequence-based interventions for all students (i.e., Tier 1), and for those who need additional support (i.e., Tier 2), such as students with ADHD. Because these interventions may be challenging to use, targeted, theory-driven implementation strategies may assist teachers in implementing them with fidelity. This exploratory study examined teachers' intended and self-reported use of specific Tier 1 and Tier 2 behavioral classroom interventions. Sixty-five K-8 teachers from five urban public schools completed an online survey about their intentions to use and self-reported use of four Tier 1 and Tier 2 behavioral classroom interventions. Teachers' intentions varied by intervention, with the weakest intentions for using a daily behavior report (Tier 2), and weaker intentions for using high rates of specific praise than for other Tier 1 interventions. Teacher's self-reported use was significantly lower than intended use for Tier 1 interventions, but not Tier 2 interventions. Results were generally similar whether the referent group was students with ADHD symptoms or the entire class. These results suggest specific factors to target to support teachers' use of behavioral classroom interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"78-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11060708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2183434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2183434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多层次的行为支持系统为教师提供了各种工具,以对所有学生(即第一层)和那些需要额外支持的学生(即第二层)(如患有多动症的学生)实施积极的、以前因后果为基础的干预措施。由于这些干预措施的使用可能具有挑战性,有针对性的、以理论为导向的实施策略可以帮助教师忠实地实施这些措施。这项探索性研究考察了教师对具体的一级和二级课堂行为干预措施的预期和自我报告使用情况。来自五所城市公立学校的 65 名 K-8 级教师完成了一项在线调查,了解他们对四种一级和二级课堂行为干预措施的使用意图和自我报告使用情况。教师们的意向因干预措施而异,其中使用日常行为报告(第二级)的意向最弱,而使用高比例特定表扬的意向则弱于其他第一级干预措施。在一级干预措施中,教师自我报告的使用率明显低于预期使用率,但在二级干预措施中则不然。无论参照组是有多动症症状的学生还是全班学生,结果基本相似。这些结果提出了支持教师使用课堂行为干预的具体因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Teachers' Intentions to Use Behavioral Classroom Interventions.

Multi-tiered systems of behavioral supports offer teachers tools to implement positive, antecedent- or consequence-based interventions for all students (i.e., Tier 1), and for those who need additional support (i.e., Tier 2), such as students with ADHD. Because these interventions may be challenging to use, targeted, theory-driven implementation strategies may assist teachers in implementing them with fidelity. This exploratory study examined teachers' intended and self-reported use of specific Tier 1 and Tier 2 behavioral classroom interventions. Sixty-five K-8 teachers from five urban public schools completed an online survey about their intentions to use and self-reported use of four Tier 1 and Tier 2 behavioral classroom interventions. Teachers' intentions varied by intervention, with the weakest intentions for using a daily behavior report (Tier 2), and weaker intentions for using high rates of specific praise than for other Tier 1 interventions. Teacher's self-reported use was significantly lower than intended use for Tier 1 interventions, but not Tier 2 interventions. Results were generally similar whether the referent group was students with ADHD symptoms or the entire class. These results suggest specific factors to target to support teachers' use of behavioral classroom interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信