（更改）名称中包含什么？很多——但不是那么多——也不是Wiebe所说的

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-05-06 DOI:10.1163/15700682-12341478

Satoko Fujiwara, Tim Jensen

{"title":"（更改）名称中包含什么？很多——但不是那么多——也不是Wiebe所说的","authors":"Satoko Fujiwara, Tim Jensen","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDonald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to “International Association for the Study of Religions.” His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341478","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s in a (Change of) Name? Much—but Not That Much—and Not What Wiebe Claims\",\"authors\":\"Satoko Fujiwara, Tim Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15700682-12341478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nDonald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to “International Association for the Study of Religions.” His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341478\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341478\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

Donald Wiebe声称，IAHR的领导层(在德尔菲举行的扩展执行委员会(EEC)会议之前)已经决定降低IAHR的学术标准，提议将其更名为“国际宗教研究协会”。我们认为，他的批评是基于以下方面的一系列误解:1)协商机构(EEC)和决策机构(EC)之间的差异，2)个人的初步观点与EC的最终建议之间的差异，3)个人对话，4)更改名称的建议与希望加强IAHR学术形象之间的联系。此外，如果最终的决策机构，国际委员会和大会通过了这项建议，新名称和旧名称一样少，可以使《国际卫生条例》或多或少地具有科学性。加强IAHR的学术和科学形象不仅仅需要改变名称。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What’s in a (Change of) Name? Much—but Not That Much—and Not What Wiebe Claims

Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to “International Association for the Study of Religions.” His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion. This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such newer disciplinary approaches as feminist theory and studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on the critical analysis of theoretical problems prominent in the study of religion.