道路交通伤害和道路安全措施——我们还能做得更好吗?

M. Morgado, Filipa Jalles, S. Lobo, F. Abecasis, Miroslava Gonçalves
{"title":"道路交通伤害和道路安全措施——我们还能做得更好吗?","authors":"M. Morgado, Filipa Jalles, S. Lobo, F. Abecasis, Miroslava Gonçalves","doi":"10.4172/2161-0665.1000319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death under 30 years, causing over a million deaths every year. Helmets, seat-belts and child-restraints have an important role in death and injury prevention. Our purpose was to analyze how safety measures relate to pediatric polytrauma severity in road traffic injury. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including polytraumatized pediatric patients, hospitalized after road traffic accidents, from January 2011 to December 2015. Comparison groups were classified according to protective equipment use. Logistic regression and generalized liner models describe the probability of safety equipment use, head trauma, higher injury severity score and permanent sequelae. Results: Of a total of 149 inpatients, 63.8% were male with a median age of 11 years. Absence of personal protective equipment was predictive for head trauma (p-value=0.014) and diffuse axonal injury associated with neurologic sequelae and death (p-value<0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher risk of protective equipment misuse in unsupervised children and in two-wheel accidents (p-value<0.05). Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were inversely proportional (p-value<0.001). Sequelae were more frequent with lower GCS (p<0.001) and diffuse axonal lesion (p<0.001). Conclusions: Despite increasing alertness, helmet use in road accidents remains limited, reflecting on head trauma severity and subsequent neurological impairment. Absence of protective equipment on car collisions provoked more severe injury scores and prolonged hospital stay. In the \"Decade of Action for Road Safety\" we still find important handicaps in road safety measures, demanding more effective laws and alerting campaigns.","PeriodicalId":91373,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Road Traffic Injuries and Road Safety Measures-Can We Do Any Better?\",\"authors\":\"M. Morgado, Filipa Jalles, S. Lobo, F. Abecasis, Miroslava Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2161-0665.1000319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death under 30 years, causing over a million deaths every year. Helmets, seat-belts and child-restraints have an important role in death and injury prevention. Our purpose was to analyze how safety measures relate to pediatric polytrauma severity in road traffic injury. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including polytraumatized pediatric patients, hospitalized after road traffic accidents, from January 2011 to December 2015. Comparison groups were classified according to protective equipment use. Logistic regression and generalized liner models describe the probability of safety equipment use, head trauma, higher injury severity score and permanent sequelae. Results: Of a total of 149 inpatients, 63.8% were male with a median age of 11 years. Absence of personal protective equipment was predictive for head trauma (p-value=0.014) and diffuse axonal injury associated with neurologic sequelae and death (p-value<0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher risk of protective equipment misuse in unsupervised children and in two-wheel accidents (p-value<0.05). Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were inversely proportional (p-value<0.001). Sequelae were more frequent with lower GCS (p<0.001) and diffuse axonal lesion (p<0.001). Conclusions: Despite increasing alertness, helmet use in road accidents remains limited, reflecting on head trauma severity and subsequent neurological impairment. Absence of protective equipment on car collisions provoked more severe injury scores and prolonged hospital stay. In the \\\"Decade of Action for Road Safety\\\" we still find important handicaps in road safety measures, demanding more effective laws and alerting campaigns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0665.1000319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0665.1000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:道路交通伤害是30岁以下死亡的主要原因,每年造成100多万人死亡。头盔、安全带和儿童约束装置在预防伤亡方面发挥着重要作用。我们的目的是分析道路交通伤害中安全措施与儿童多发伤严重程度的关系。方法:对2011年1月至2015年12月因道路交通事故住院的多发伤儿科患者进行回顾性观察研究。对照组根据防护设备的使用进行分类。Logistic回归和广义线性模型描述了安全设备使用、头部创伤、较高损伤严重程度评分和永久后遗症的概率。结果:149名住院患者中,63.8%为男性,中位年龄11岁。缺乏个人防护设备可预测头部创伤(p值=0.014)和弥漫性轴索损伤,并伴有神经后遗症和死亡(p值<0.01)。多因素分析证实,在无人监督的儿童和两轮车事故中,防护设备滥用的风险更高(p值<0.05)。损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)呈反比成比例(p值<0.001)。GCS较低(p<0.001)和弥漫性轴索损伤(p<001)更常见后遗症。结论:尽管警觉性提高,但在道路事故中使用头盔的情况仍然有限,这反映了头部创伤的严重程度和随后的神经损伤。汽车碰撞时没有防护设备会导致更严重的伤害评分和住院时间延长。在“道路安全行动十年”中,我们仍然发现道路安全措施存在重要障碍,要求制定更有效的法律并开展警示活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Road Traffic Injuries and Road Safety Measures-Can We Do Any Better?
Purpose: Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death under 30 years, causing over a million deaths every year. Helmets, seat-belts and child-restraints have an important role in death and injury prevention. Our purpose was to analyze how safety measures relate to pediatric polytrauma severity in road traffic injury. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including polytraumatized pediatric patients, hospitalized after road traffic accidents, from January 2011 to December 2015. Comparison groups were classified according to protective equipment use. Logistic regression and generalized liner models describe the probability of safety equipment use, head trauma, higher injury severity score and permanent sequelae. Results: Of a total of 149 inpatients, 63.8% were male with a median age of 11 years. Absence of personal protective equipment was predictive for head trauma (p-value=0.014) and diffuse axonal injury associated with neurologic sequelae and death (p-value<0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher risk of protective equipment misuse in unsupervised children and in two-wheel accidents (p-value<0.05). Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were inversely proportional (p-value<0.001). Sequelae were more frequent with lower GCS (p<0.001) and diffuse axonal lesion (p<0.001). Conclusions: Despite increasing alertness, helmet use in road accidents remains limited, reflecting on head trauma severity and subsequent neurological impairment. Absence of protective equipment on car collisions provoked more severe injury scores and prolonged hospital stay. In the "Decade of Action for Road Safety" we still find important handicaps in road safety measures, demanding more effective laws and alerting campaigns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信