Ron E. Hassner《酷刑解剖》(书评)

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Ryan M. Welch
{"title":"Ron E. Hassner《酷刑解剖》(书评)","authors":"Ryan M. Welch","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In other words, there is nothing wrong with the waging of forever wars—against communism, terrorism, and the enemies of freedom—so long as we can feel good about how this is being done and are spared the ugly bits. Fat free, sugar free war enjoyed thousands of miles away from the real consequences. What gives Moyn’s Humane its gravity, and which elevates it above interesting but cynically critical texts in the same vein like Jean Baudrillard’s The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, is the fact that he genuinely believes in an alternative to all this. Drawing deeply on the pacifist tradition of Leo Tolstoy and Bertha von Suttner, Moyn wonders why so much time is spent resigned to making war more humane—and consequently less appalling—and not on the cause of achieving genuine worldwide peace. Written in the aftermath of a 20-year-long failed campaign in Afghanistan and as Russian tanks roll over the Ukrainian plains, it is a very good question. It also isn’t an especially partisan one. While Moyn himself is obviously very much on the left end of the American political spectrum, Humane is very free of the rote biases and mania that characterizes too much commentary on American geopolitics. Indeed, some of the most complex sections of the book involve his deep ruminations of Barak Obama. Initially hailed as a worldwide symbol of progress, preemptively crowned with a Nobel Prize as his tenure had barely begun, Moyn makes no bones about the role of Obama’s administration in perpetuating and even expanding the global war on terror. In an appropriately Tolstoyan manner, Moyn is critical of the 44th President even as he acknowledges how powerless the most powerful man in the world sometimes seemed to advance a cause of peace undoubtedly close to his heart. That fat free, sugar free war has become a structural necessity is one of the grimmer intuitions one gets when reading Humane. There are limitations to Moyn’s book. It would have been nice to see him engage more deeply with the literature defending war, of which there is always a surfeit. This isn’t only for geopolitical reasons. Many find in war everything from an expression of human nature to a catalyst for our most exalted existential projects; including many of the neoconservative intellectuals who cameo in the later parts of Humane. It would have been interesting to see Moyn take a page out of Corey Robin’s playbook and engage this vastly different conceptualizations head on. But these are minor quibbles next to the book’s immense riches. Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War is a remarkable book by an essential scholar. We can only hope that more of us will take Moyn’s dream seriously and give real peace a chance.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"347 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy of Torture by Ron E. Hassner (review)\",\"authors\":\"Ryan M. Welch\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hrq.2023.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In other words, there is nothing wrong with the waging of forever wars—against communism, terrorism, and the enemies of freedom—so long as we can feel good about how this is being done and are spared the ugly bits. Fat free, sugar free war enjoyed thousands of miles away from the real consequences. What gives Moyn’s Humane its gravity, and which elevates it above interesting but cynically critical texts in the same vein like Jean Baudrillard’s The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, is the fact that he genuinely believes in an alternative to all this. Drawing deeply on the pacifist tradition of Leo Tolstoy and Bertha von Suttner, Moyn wonders why so much time is spent resigned to making war more humane—and consequently less appalling—and not on the cause of achieving genuine worldwide peace. Written in the aftermath of a 20-year-long failed campaign in Afghanistan and as Russian tanks roll over the Ukrainian plains, it is a very good question. It also isn’t an especially partisan one. While Moyn himself is obviously very much on the left end of the American political spectrum, Humane is very free of the rote biases and mania that characterizes too much commentary on American geopolitics. Indeed, some of the most complex sections of the book involve his deep ruminations of Barak Obama. Initially hailed as a worldwide symbol of progress, preemptively crowned with a Nobel Prize as his tenure had barely begun, Moyn makes no bones about the role of Obama’s administration in perpetuating and even expanding the global war on terror. In an appropriately Tolstoyan manner, Moyn is critical of the 44th President even as he acknowledges how powerless the most powerful man in the world sometimes seemed to advance a cause of peace undoubtedly close to his heart. That fat free, sugar free war has become a structural necessity is one of the grimmer intuitions one gets when reading Humane. There are limitations to Moyn’s book. It would have been nice to see him engage more deeply with the literature defending war, of which there is always a surfeit. This isn’t only for geopolitical reasons. Many find in war everything from an expression of human nature to a catalyst for our most exalted existential projects; including many of the neoconservative intellectuals who cameo in the later parts of Humane. It would have been interesting to see Moyn take a page out of Corey Robin’s playbook and engage this vastly different conceptualizations head on. But these are minor quibbles next to the book’s immense riches. Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War is a remarkable book by an essential scholar. We can only hope that more of us will take Moyn’s dream seriously and give real peace a chance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Rights Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"347 - 352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Rights Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.0019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.0019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

换句话说,对共产主义、恐怖主义和自由的敌人进行永远的战争并没有错,只要我们对战争的进行方式感到满意,并避免了丑陋的部分。无脂、无糖的战争享受了千里之外的真正后果。莫恩的《人道主义》之所以如此严肃,并超越了让·鲍德里亚的《海湾战争没有发生》等有趣但愤世嫉俗的批判文本,是因为他真诚地相信有一种替代这一切的方法。莫恩深深吸取了列夫·托尔斯泰和伯莎·冯·萨特纳的和平主义传统,他想知道为什么人们花了那么多时间来让战争变得更人道,从而减少战争的骇人听闻,而不是为了实现真正的世界和平。在阿富汗长达20年的失败战役之后,当俄罗斯坦克在乌克兰平原上滚动时,这是一个非常好的问题。它也没有特别的党派之争。虽然莫恩本人显然是美国政治光谱的左派,但赫曼却没有机械式的偏见和狂热,而这些偏见和狂热是美国地缘政治评论中太多的特征。事实上,书中一些最复杂的部分涉及到他对巴拉克•奥巴马(barack Obama)的深刻反思。莫恩最初被誉为世界进步的象征,在他的任期刚刚开始就被抢先授予诺贝尔奖,他毫不掩饰奥巴马政府在延续甚至扩大全球反恐战争中的作用。莫恩以一种适当的托尔斯泰式的方式,批评了第44任总统,尽管他承认,这个世界上最有权势的人有时似乎是多么无能为力,而推动和平的事业无疑是他最关心的。无脂肪、无糖的战争已经成为一种结构性的必需品,这是人们在阅读《人道主义》时得到的最严峻的直觉之一。莫恩的书也有局限性。如果能看到他更深入地参与到捍卫战争的文学作品中,那就太好了。这不仅仅是出于地缘政治原因。许多人在战争中发现了一切,从人性的表达到我们最崇高的存在计划的催化剂;包括许多新保守主义知识分子,他们在《人道》的后半部分客串过。如果能看到莫恩从科里·罗宾的剧本中吸取教训,并将这种截然不同的概念引入其中,那将是一件很有趣的事情。但与这本书的巨大财富相比,这些都是微不足道的吹毛求疵。《人道主义:美国如何放弃和平,重塑战争》是一位重要学者撰写的杰出著作。我们只能希望更多的人认真对待莫恩的梦想,给真正的和平一个机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomy of Torture by Ron E. Hassner (review)
In other words, there is nothing wrong with the waging of forever wars—against communism, terrorism, and the enemies of freedom—so long as we can feel good about how this is being done and are spared the ugly bits. Fat free, sugar free war enjoyed thousands of miles away from the real consequences. What gives Moyn’s Humane its gravity, and which elevates it above interesting but cynically critical texts in the same vein like Jean Baudrillard’s The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, is the fact that he genuinely believes in an alternative to all this. Drawing deeply on the pacifist tradition of Leo Tolstoy and Bertha von Suttner, Moyn wonders why so much time is spent resigned to making war more humane—and consequently less appalling—and not on the cause of achieving genuine worldwide peace. Written in the aftermath of a 20-year-long failed campaign in Afghanistan and as Russian tanks roll over the Ukrainian plains, it is a very good question. It also isn’t an especially partisan one. While Moyn himself is obviously very much on the left end of the American political spectrum, Humane is very free of the rote biases and mania that characterizes too much commentary on American geopolitics. Indeed, some of the most complex sections of the book involve his deep ruminations of Barak Obama. Initially hailed as a worldwide symbol of progress, preemptively crowned with a Nobel Prize as his tenure had barely begun, Moyn makes no bones about the role of Obama’s administration in perpetuating and even expanding the global war on terror. In an appropriately Tolstoyan manner, Moyn is critical of the 44th President even as he acknowledges how powerless the most powerful man in the world sometimes seemed to advance a cause of peace undoubtedly close to his heart. That fat free, sugar free war has become a structural necessity is one of the grimmer intuitions one gets when reading Humane. There are limitations to Moyn’s book. It would have been nice to see him engage more deeply with the literature defending war, of which there is always a surfeit. This isn’t only for geopolitical reasons. Many find in war everything from an expression of human nature to a catalyst for our most exalted existential projects; including many of the neoconservative intellectuals who cameo in the later parts of Humane. It would have been interesting to see Moyn take a page out of Corey Robin’s playbook and engage this vastly different conceptualizations head on. But these are minor quibbles next to the book’s immense riches. Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War is a remarkable book by an essential scholar. We can only hope that more of us will take Moyn’s dream seriously and give real peace a chance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Now entering its twenty-fifth year, Human Rights Quarterly is widely recognizedas the leader in the field of human rights. Articles written by experts from around the world and from a range of disciplines are edited to be understood by the intelligent reader. The Quarterly provides up-to-date information on important developments within the United Nations and regional human rights organizations, both governmental and non-governmental. It presents current work in human rights research and policy analysis, reviews of related books, and philosophical essays probing the fundamental nature of human rights as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信