血管内覆膜支架置入治疗医源性损伤的非病变动脉后是否需要抗血小板治疗?

A. Salaskar
{"title":"血管内覆膜支架置入治疗医源性损伤的非病变动脉后是否需要抗血小板治疗?","authors":"A. Salaskar","doi":"10.19080/JOCCT.2018.12.555830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The patient was a 50-year-old female who had past medical history of hemiglossectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and recent diagnosis of lung metastasis now presented to emergency department with respiratory failure and sepsis. During resuscitation, CVC was erroneously placed into a R-CCA. CT scan of the neck revealed a CVC entering from right side of the neck then coursing directly into the R-CCA lumen. Patient was urgently taken to IR suite. Selective angiography demonstrated patent R-CCA without any extravasation and 7 Fr CVC entering into the lumen of R-CCA and then coursing into the aortic arch. Under fluoroscopy guidance, as the CVC was slowly being retracted over a wire, a 7 mm x 2.5 cm heparin bonded Viabahn covered stent was deployed to seal the defect in the R-CCA. The stent was then inflated with same size 7 mm balloon without exerting any stretch on the vessel wall. Completion angiography demonstrated patent R-CCA without any evidence of extravasation. Based on prior CT scans, patient did not have any atherosclerotic disease in the cardiovascular system. After carotid artery stenting, patient was placed on antiplatelet medication regimen with an intention to prevent a stent thrombosis as per the common clinical practices. However, we would like to question the need for any antiplatelet treatment after an endovascular stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenically injured non-atherosclerotic disease-free vessel.","PeriodicalId":73635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is an Antiplatelet Treatment required after an Endovascular covered stent placement for Treatment of Iatrogenically Injured non diseased Arteries?\",\"authors\":\"A. Salaskar\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/JOCCT.2018.12.555830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The patient was a 50-year-old female who had past medical history of hemiglossectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and recent diagnosis of lung metastasis now presented to emergency department with respiratory failure and sepsis. During resuscitation, CVC was erroneously placed into a R-CCA. CT scan of the neck revealed a CVC entering from right side of the neck then coursing directly into the R-CCA lumen. Patient was urgently taken to IR suite. Selective angiography demonstrated patent R-CCA without any extravasation and 7 Fr CVC entering into the lumen of R-CCA and then coursing into the aortic arch. Under fluoroscopy guidance, as the CVC was slowly being retracted over a wire, a 7 mm x 2.5 cm heparin bonded Viabahn covered stent was deployed to seal the defect in the R-CCA. The stent was then inflated with same size 7 mm balloon without exerting any stretch on the vessel wall. Completion angiography demonstrated patent R-CCA without any evidence of extravasation. Based on prior CT scans, patient did not have any atherosclerotic disease in the cardiovascular system. After carotid artery stenting, patient was placed on antiplatelet medication regimen with an intention to prevent a stent thrombosis as per the common clinical practices. However, we would like to question the need for any antiplatelet treatment after an endovascular stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenically injured non-atherosclerotic disease-free vessel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/JOCCT.2018.12.555830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/JOCCT.2018.12.555830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者为50岁女性,既往因舌鳞状细胞癌行半盲切除术,近期诊断为肺转移,现因呼吸衰竭及败血症就诊于急诊科。在复苏过程中,CVC被错误地放置在R-CCA中。颈部CT扫描显示CVC从颈部右侧进入,然后直接进入R-CCA管腔。病人被紧急送往急诊室。选择性血管造影显示R-CCA未闭,无任何外渗,7fr CVC进入R-CCA管腔,然后进入主动脉弓。在透视引导下,当CVC通过导线缓慢收缩时,放置一个7 mm x 2.5 cm的肝素结合Viabahn覆盖支架来密封R-CCA中的缺陷。然后用同样大小的7毫米球囊对支架进行充气,不对血管壁施加任何拉伸。血管造影显示R-CCA专利,无任何外渗迹象。根据先前的CT扫描,患者没有任何心血管系统的动脉粥样硬化性疾病。颈动脉支架植入术后,患者按照临床惯例给予抗血小板药物治疗,目的是防止支架内血栓形成。然而,我们想质疑在血管内支架置入治疗医源性损伤的非动脉粥样硬化性无病血管后是否需要任何抗血小板治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is an Antiplatelet Treatment required after an Endovascular covered stent placement for Treatment of Iatrogenically Injured non diseased Arteries?
The patient was a 50-year-old female who had past medical history of hemiglossectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and recent diagnosis of lung metastasis now presented to emergency department with respiratory failure and sepsis. During resuscitation, CVC was erroneously placed into a R-CCA. CT scan of the neck revealed a CVC entering from right side of the neck then coursing directly into the R-CCA lumen. Patient was urgently taken to IR suite. Selective angiography demonstrated patent R-CCA without any extravasation and 7 Fr CVC entering into the lumen of R-CCA and then coursing into the aortic arch. Under fluoroscopy guidance, as the CVC was slowly being retracted over a wire, a 7 mm x 2.5 cm heparin bonded Viabahn covered stent was deployed to seal the defect in the R-CCA. The stent was then inflated with same size 7 mm balloon without exerting any stretch on the vessel wall. Completion angiography demonstrated patent R-CCA without any evidence of extravasation. Based on prior CT scans, patient did not have any atherosclerotic disease in the cardiovascular system. After carotid artery stenting, patient was placed on antiplatelet medication regimen with an intention to prevent a stent thrombosis as per the common clinical practices. However, we would like to question the need for any antiplatelet treatment after an endovascular stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenically injured non-atherosclerotic disease-free vessel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信