(欧盟)劳动法的新来源?

IF 1.1 Q2 LAW
Mélanie Schmitt, Marco Rocca
{"title":"(欧盟)劳动法的新来源?","authors":"Mélanie Schmitt, Marco Rocca","doi":"10.1177/20319525221093510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Looking at the instruments of the EU economic governance (Memoranda of Understanding; Country Specific Recommendations) from the perspective of national labour law systems reveals wide differences in their impact. If it is possible to draw a direct link between the demands of a Memorandum and national labour law reforms, the picture is less clear for Country Specific Recommendations. Notably, different Member States show a different degree of ability to ‘resist’ these Recommendations, which appears to be based more on their coherence (or lack thereof) with national political preferences than on the specific situation of the given Member State when it comes to the corrective mechanisms of the EU economic governance. From the perspective of labour law, these instruments still show little in the way of a more ‘social’ approach. Taken together, these conclusions suggest that the instruments of the EU economic governance could hardly provide a productive contribution to the development and enforcement of EU labour law, risking, on the contrary, leading to its fragmentation due to their uneven impact across Member States.","PeriodicalId":41157,"journal":{"name":"European Labour Law Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"214 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new source for (EU) labour law?\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Schmitt, Marco Rocca\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20319525221093510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Looking at the instruments of the EU economic governance (Memoranda of Understanding; Country Specific Recommendations) from the perspective of national labour law systems reveals wide differences in their impact. If it is possible to draw a direct link between the demands of a Memorandum and national labour law reforms, the picture is less clear for Country Specific Recommendations. Notably, different Member States show a different degree of ability to ‘resist’ these Recommendations, which appears to be based more on their coherence (or lack thereof) with national political preferences than on the specific situation of the given Member State when it comes to the corrective mechanisms of the EU economic governance. From the perspective of labour law, these instruments still show little in the way of a more ‘social’ approach. Taken together, these conclusions suggest that the instruments of the EU economic governance could hardly provide a productive contribution to the development and enforcement of EU labour law, risking, on the contrary, leading to its fragmentation due to their uneven impact across Member States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Labour Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"214 - 224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Labour Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525221093510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Labour Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525221093510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

看看欧盟经济治理的工具(谅解备忘录;《国别具体建议》从各国劳动法制度的角度揭示了其影响的巨大差异。如果可以在备忘录的要求与国家劳工法改革之间建立直接联系,国别具体建议的情况就不太清楚了。值得注意的是,不同的成员国表现出不同程度的“抵制”这些建议的能力,这似乎更多地基于它们与国家政治偏好的一致性(或缺乏一致性),而不是特定成员国在欧盟经济治理纠正机制方面的具体情况。从劳动法的角度来看,这些工具仍然没有显示出更多的“社会”方法。综上所述,这些结论表明,欧盟经济治理的工具几乎不能为欧盟劳动法的发展和执行提供富有成效的贡献,相反,由于它们在成员国之间的影响不均衡,有可能导致其分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new source for (EU) labour law?
Looking at the instruments of the EU economic governance (Memoranda of Understanding; Country Specific Recommendations) from the perspective of national labour law systems reveals wide differences in their impact. If it is possible to draw a direct link between the demands of a Memorandum and national labour law reforms, the picture is less clear for Country Specific Recommendations. Notably, different Member States show a different degree of ability to ‘resist’ these Recommendations, which appears to be based more on their coherence (or lack thereof) with national political preferences than on the specific situation of the given Member State when it comes to the corrective mechanisms of the EU economic governance. From the perspective of labour law, these instruments still show little in the way of a more ‘social’ approach. Taken together, these conclusions suggest that the instruments of the EU economic governance could hardly provide a productive contribution to the development and enforcement of EU labour law, risking, on the contrary, leading to its fragmentation due to their uneven impact across Member States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信