使用基于实验基准的有限元方法评估梁配置对设计梁柱连接结构的影响

IF 1.7 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cakram Yudhifa Ganda Satriawan, A. Prabowo, T. Muttaqie, Ridwan Ridwan, N. Muhayat, H. Carvalho, F. Imaduddin
{"title":"使用基于实验基准的有限元方法评估梁配置对设计梁柱连接结构的影响","authors":"Cakram Yudhifa Ganda Satriawan, A. Prabowo, T. Muttaqie, Ridwan Ridwan, N. Muhayat, H. Carvalho, F. Imaduddin","doi":"10.1515/jmbm-2022-0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose This article aims to investigate the structural behavior of beam–column joints subjected to axial force. The geometry used is the addition of a number of beam connections to the column, and the differences in the numbers of beams used are 1, 2, 4, and 4, denoted as V1, V2, V3, and V4, respectively. Design/methodology/approach In this work, the analysis was performed using the numerical finite element method with ABAQUS software. A benchmarking analysis was also conducted to validate the numerical results. Findings Several numerical simulations showed that of the variations tested, the V2 model demonstrated the highest force value among the four test models, at 130.883 kN. The displacement caused by the force was 227.32 mm, which was the lowest value among the four test models. On the other hand, the V3 model received the smallest force value among the four test models, at 24.576 kN, with a displacement of 227.49 mm. The displacement value was greater than that for the V2 model, further indicating that the V2 model was the stiffest of the four models tested. Originality/value This study shows that the influence of beam–column joint geometry is not limited to double-extended end-plate bolted connections.","PeriodicalId":17354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the beam configuration effects on designed beam–column connection structures using FE methodology based on experimental benchmarking\",\"authors\":\"Cakram Yudhifa Ganda Satriawan, A. Prabowo, T. Muttaqie, Ridwan Ridwan, N. Muhayat, H. Carvalho, F. Imaduddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jmbm-2022-0284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Purpose This article aims to investigate the structural behavior of beam–column joints subjected to axial force. The geometry used is the addition of a number of beam connections to the column, and the differences in the numbers of beams used are 1, 2, 4, and 4, denoted as V1, V2, V3, and V4, respectively. Design/methodology/approach In this work, the analysis was performed using the numerical finite element method with ABAQUS software. A benchmarking analysis was also conducted to validate the numerical results. Findings Several numerical simulations showed that of the variations tested, the V2 model demonstrated the highest force value among the four test models, at 130.883 kN. The displacement caused by the force was 227.32 mm, which was the lowest value among the four test models. On the other hand, the V3 model received the smallest force value among the four test models, at 24.576 kN, with a displacement of 227.49 mm. The displacement value was greater than that for the V2 model, further indicating that the V2 model was the stiffest of the four models tested. Originality/value This study shows that the influence of beam–column joint geometry is not limited to double-extended end-plate bolted connections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要目的本文旨在研究梁柱节点在轴向力作用下的结构性能。所用的几何结构是将多个梁连接添加到柱上,所用梁数量的差异为1、2、4和4,分别表示为V1、V2、V3和V4。设计/方法/方法在这项工作中,使用ABAQUS软件使用数值有限元方法进行分析。还进行了基准分析以验证数值结果。研究结果几次数值模拟表明,在测试的变化中,V2模型的力值在四个测试模型中最高,为130.883 kN。该力引起的位移为227.32 mm,这是四个测试模型中的最低值。另一方面,V3模型在四个测试模型中受到的力值最小,为24.576 kN,位移227.49 位移值大于V2模型的位移值,进一步表明V2模型是测试的四个模型中最硬的。原创性/价值本研究表明,梁柱节点几何形状的影响不仅限于双延伸端板螺栓连接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the beam configuration effects on designed beam–column connection structures using FE methodology based on experimental benchmarking
Abstract Purpose This article aims to investigate the structural behavior of beam–column joints subjected to axial force. The geometry used is the addition of a number of beam connections to the column, and the differences in the numbers of beams used are 1, 2, 4, and 4, denoted as V1, V2, V3, and V4, respectively. Design/methodology/approach In this work, the analysis was performed using the numerical finite element method with ABAQUS software. A benchmarking analysis was also conducted to validate the numerical results. Findings Several numerical simulations showed that of the variations tested, the V2 model demonstrated the highest force value among the four test models, at 130.883 kN. The displacement caused by the force was 227.32 mm, which was the lowest value among the four test models. On the other hand, the V3 model received the smallest force value among the four test models, at 24.576 kN, with a displacement of 227.49 mm. The displacement value was greater than that for the V2 model, further indicating that the V2 model was the stiffest of the four models tested. Originality/value This study shows that the influence of beam–column joint geometry is not limited to double-extended end-plate bolted connections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on the micromechanics and nanomechanics of materials, the relationship between structure and mechanical properties, material instabilities and fracture, as well as size effects and length/time scale transitions. Articles on cutting edge theory, simulations and experiments – used as tools for revealing novel material properties and designing new devices for structural, thermo-chemo-mechanical, and opto-electro-mechanical applications – are encouraged. Synthesis/processing and related traditional mechanics/materials science themes are not within the scope of JMBM. The Editorial Board also organizes topical issues on emerging areas by invitation. Topics Metals and Alloys Ceramics and Glasses Soils and Geomaterials Concrete and Cementitious Materials Polymers and Composites Wood and Paper Elastomers and Biomaterials Liquid Crystals and Suspensions Electromagnetic and Optoelectronic Materials High-energy Density Storage Materials Monument Restoration and Cultural Heritage Preservation Materials Nanomaterials Complex and Emerging Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信