ENDOLIFT®和多波长激光光生物调制:一项针对96名受试者的随机对照试验研究,治疗面部下三分之一的皮肤松弛

Q2 Medicine
Laser therapy Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.4081/ltj.2022.298
L. Longo, R. Dell'avanzato, Diego Longo
{"title":"ENDOLIFT®和多波长激光光生物调制:一项针对96名受试者的随机对照试验研究,治疗面部下三分之一的皮肤松弛","authors":"L. Longo, R. Dell'avanzato, Diego Longo","doi":"10.4081/ltj.2022.298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: Many patients look for procedures that can achieve similar results to surgical lift avoiding the risks and possible complications of surgery. Endolift® and multi-wavelength (MW) Laser photobiomodulation (PBM) are considered two of the most effective procedures in the treatment of skin laxity and superficial wrinkles. We aimed to investigate the reduction of skin laxity of the lower third of the face treated with the Endolift® technique alone or in combination with MW Laser PBM. Materials and Methods: From June 2016 to June 2018, 96 subjects (18 M; 78 F) were included in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in two Italian institutions. The area treated was the lower third of the face. The subjects were classified using the Ptosis Scale (grade I-V) at T0, with a Pinch Test <1.9 mm. We selected only subjects’ grade 4, both males and females, 45-55-years old. Thirty-two subjects (6M; 26F) (group 1) were treated with the Endolift® procedure followed by a session of MW Laser PBM using a simultaneous nonsurgical laser therapy emission of three different wavelengths (532 nm, 808 nm, 1064 nm). The MW Laser PBM was repeated after 7, 14 and 21 days. Thirty-two subjects (6M; 26F) (group 2) underwent only the Endolift® session. 32 subjects (6M; 26F) (group 3) received only MW Laser PBM. Follow up visits were performed at days 60 (T60), 120 (T120) and 540 (T540) after the treatments. The study ended in December 2019 when all the subjects had been followed for 18 months. Results: The results of the three groups were evaluated using the Ptosis Scale at T0, T60, T120 and T540. The combination of the two treatments (group 1) achieved more rapid effects, while MW Laser PBM alone treatment (group 3) achieved the slowest effect. The median test for independent samples showed that all the differences between groups are statistically significant at each follow-up (p=0.000). Conclusions: The Endolift® laser in the last 15 years allows to achieve exceptional results in the treatment of skin laxity reaching the desired ‘soft’ rejuvenation model which is increasingly desired. MW Laser PBM, in combination with Endolift®, obtains better results. Although significant at T540, the effects of MW Laser PBM alone are slower to reach.","PeriodicalId":17981,"journal":{"name":"Laser therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENDOLIFT® and multi-wavelength laser photobiomodulation: a randomized controlled trial study on 96 subjects, treating skin laxity of the lower third of the face\",\"authors\":\"L. Longo, R. Dell'avanzato, Diego Longo\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ltj.2022.298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aims: Many patients look for procedures that can achieve similar results to surgical lift avoiding the risks and possible complications of surgery. Endolift® and multi-wavelength (MW) Laser photobiomodulation (PBM) are considered two of the most effective procedures in the treatment of skin laxity and superficial wrinkles. We aimed to investigate the reduction of skin laxity of the lower third of the face treated with the Endolift® technique alone or in combination with MW Laser PBM. Materials and Methods: From June 2016 to June 2018, 96 subjects (18 M; 78 F) were included in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in two Italian institutions. The area treated was the lower third of the face. The subjects were classified using the Ptosis Scale (grade I-V) at T0, with a Pinch Test <1.9 mm. We selected only subjects’ grade 4, both males and females, 45-55-years old. Thirty-two subjects (6M; 26F) (group 1) were treated with the Endolift® procedure followed by a session of MW Laser PBM using a simultaneous nonsurgical laser therapy emission of three different wavelengths (532 nm, 808 nm, 1064 nm). The MW Laser PBM was repeated after 7, 14 and 21 days. Thirty-two subjects (6M; 26F) (group 2) underwent only the Endolift® session. 32 subjects (6M; 26F) (group 3) received only MW Laser PBM. Follow up visits were performed at days 60 (T60), 120 (T120) and 540 (T540) after the treatments. The study ended in December 2019 when all the subjects had been followed for 18 months. Results: The results of the three groups were evaluated using the Ptosis Scale at T0, T60, T120 and T540. The combination of the two treatments (group 1) achieved more rapid effects, while MW Laser PBM alone treatment (group 3) achieved the slowest effect. The median test for independent samples showed that all the differences between groups are statistically significant at each follow-up (p=0.000). Conclusions: The Endolift® laser in the last 15 years allows to achieve exceptional results in the treatment of skin laxity reaching the desired ‘soft’ rejuvenation model which is increasingly desired. MW Laser PBM, in combination with Endolift®, obtains better results. Although significant at T540, the effects of MW Laser PBM alone are slower to reach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2022.298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2022.298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景和目的:许多患者都在寻找能够达到与手术升降机相似效果的手术,以避免手术的风险和可能的并发症。Endolift®和多波长(MW)激光光生物调制(PBM)被认为是治疗皮肤松弛和浅层皱纹最有效的两种方法。我们的目的是研究单独使用Endolift®技术或与MW激光PBM联合治疗可减少面部下三分之一皮肤松弛的情况。材料和方法:从2016年6月到2018年6月,96名受试者(18名男性;78名女性)被纳入这项在意大利两家机构进行的随机对照试验(RCT)。接受治疗的部位是面部的下三分之一。受试者在T0时使用Ptosis量表(I-V级)进行分类,Pinch测试<1.9mm。我们只选择了45-55岁的4级受试者,包括男性和女性。32名受试者(6M;26F)(第1组)接受Endolift®程序治疗,然后使用三种不同波长(532nm、808nm、1064nm)的同时非手术激光治疗发射进行MW激光PBM治疗。在7、14和21天后重复MW激光PBM。32名受试者(6M;26F)(第2组)仅接受Endolift®治疗。32名受试者(6M;26F)(第3组)仅接受MW激光PBM。在治疗后第60天(T60)、第120天(T120)和第540天(T540)进行随访。该研究于2019年12月结束,当时所有受试者都接受了18个月的随访。结果:采用T0、T60、T120和T540 Ptosis量表对三组的结果进行评估。两种治疗的组合(第1组)效果更快,而MW激光PBM单独治疗(第3组)效果最慢。独立样本的中位数检验显示,在每次随访中,各组之间的所有差异都具有统计学意义(p=0.000)。结论:Endolift®激光在过去15年中能够在治疗皮肤松弛方面取得非凡的效果,达到人们越来越期望的“柔软”嫩肤模型。MW Laser PBM与Endolift®相结合,可获得更好的效果。尽管在T540时效果显著,但单独使用MW激光PBM的效果较慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ENDOLIFT® and multi-wavelength laser photobiomodulation: a randomized controlled trial study on 96 subjects, treating skin laxity of the lower third of the face
Background and aims: Many patients look for procedures that can achieve similar results to surgical lift avoiding the risks and possible complications of surgery. Endolift® and multi-wavelength (MW) Laser photobiomodulation (PBM) are considered two of the most effective procedures in the treatment of skin laxity and superficial wrinkles. We aimed to investigate the reduction of skin laxity of the lower third of the face treated with the Endolift® technique alone or in combination with MW Laser PBM. Materials and Methods: From June 2016 to June 2018, 96 subjects (18 M; 78 F) were included in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in two Italian institutions. The area treated was the lower third of the face. The subjects were classified using the Ptosis Scale (grade I-V) at T0, with a Pinch Test <1.9 mm. We selected only subjects’ grade 4, both males and females, 45-55-years old. Thirty-two subjects (6M; 26F) (group 1) were treated with the Endolift® procedure followed by a session of MW Laser PBM using a simultaneous nonsurgical laser therapy emission of three different wavelengths (532 nm, 808 nm, 1064 nm). The MW Laser PBM was repeated after 7, 14 and 21 days. Thirty-two subjects (6M; 26F) (group 2) underwent only the Endolift® session. 32 subjects (6M; 26F) (group 3) received only MW Laser PBM. Follow up visits were performed at days 60 (T60), 120 (T120) and 540 (T540) after the treatments. The study ended in December 2019 when all the subjects had been followed for 18 months. Results: The results of the three groups were evaluated using the Ptosis Scale at T0, T60, T120 and T540. The combination of the two treatments (group 1) achieved more rapid effects, while MW Laser PBM alone treatment (group 3) achieved the slowest effect. The median test for independent samples showed that all the differences between groups are statistically significant at each follow-up (p=0.000). Conclusions: The Endolift® laser in the last 15 years allows to achieve exceptional results in the treatment of skin laxity reaching the desired ‘soft’ rejuvenation model which is increasingly desired. MW Laser PBM, in combination with Endolift®, obtains better results. Although significant at T540, the effects of MW Laser PBM alone are slower to reach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laser therapy
Laser therapy Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信