综合营养管理实践对椰子种植系统生产力和固碳潜力的影响

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
V. Shinde, H. P. Maheswarappa, S. Ghavale, S. Sumitha, S. Wankhede, P. Haldankar
{"title":"综合营养管理实践对椰子种植系统生产力和固碳潜力的影响","authors":"V. Shinde, H. P. Maheswarappa, S. Ghavale, S. Sumitha, S. Wankhede, P. Haldankar","doi":"10.25081/jpc.2020.v48.i2.6368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was carried out at Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye (DBSKKV, Dapoli), Maharashtra State (India) during 2013-2018 to study the productivity and carbon sequestration potential as influenced by integrated nutrient management (INM) practices in coconut based cropping system. INM practices viz., T175 per cent of Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF) + 25 per cent of N through organic recycling with vermicompost, T250 per cent of RDF + 50 per cent of N through organic recycling with vermicompost + vermiwash application + bio-fertilizer application + in situ green manuring (cowpea), T3fully organic: 100 per cent N through organic recycling with vermicompost + vermiwash application + bio-fertilizer application + in situ green manuring (cowpea) and green leaf manuring + composted coir pith, husk incorporation and mulching with coconut leaves were imposed in coconut based cropping system involving nutmeg, cinnamon, banana and pineapple. For comparison, T4control: monocrop of coconut with recommended NPK and organic manure was maintained. Four treatments were laid out in blocks of 0.11 ha area each. Among the different INM practices, treatment T1 sequestered the highest amount of above ground (coconut + nutmeg) carbon stock (31.1 t ha-1) followed by T2 (30.3 t ha-1) and T3 (27.3 t ha-1). In contrast, the treatment T4 coconut monocrop alone had sequestered 25.6 t ha-1. The below-ground soil carbon stock in the rhizosphere of different crops was the highest in the nutrient management under T3 followed by T2 and T1, whereas, it was the lowest in coconut monocrop. The productivity of the system was higher in the intercropping garden. The coconut nut yield (5-year average) was higher yield under T1 (147.2 nuts palm-1 year-1), followed by T2 (138.4 nuts palm-1 year-1) and T3 (123.6 nuts palm-1 year-1), whereas, monocrop had recorded a significantly lower number of nuts (97.2 nuts palm-1 year-1).","PeriodicalId":36468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plantation Crops","volume":"1 1","pages":"103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity and carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based cropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management practices\",\"authors\":\"V. Shinde, H. P. Maheswarappa, S. Ghavale, S. Sumitha, S. Wankhede, P. Haldankar\",\"doi\":\"10.25081/jpc.2020.v48.i2.6368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A field experiment was carried out at Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye (DBSKKV, Dapoli), Maharashtra State (India) during 2013-2018 to study the productivity and carbon sequestration potential as influenced by integrated nutrient management (INM) practices in coconut based cropping system. INM practices viz., T175 per cent of Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF) + 25 per cent of N through organic recycling with vermicompost, T250 per cent of RDF + 50 per cent of N through organic recycling with vermicompost + vermiwash application + bio-fertilizer application + in situ green manuring (cowpea), T3fully organic: 100 per cent N through organic recycling with vermicompost + vermiwash application + bio-fertilizer application + in situ green manuring (cowpea) and green leaf manuring + composted coir pith, husk incorporation and mulching with coconut leaves were imposed in coconut based cropping system involving nutmeg, cinnamon, banana and pineapple. For comparison, T4control: monocrop of coconut with recommended NPK and organic manure was maintained. Four treatments were laid out in blocks of 0.11 ha area each. Among the different INM practices, treatment T1 sequestered the highest amount of above ground (coconut + nutmeg) carbon stock (31.1 t ha-1) followed by T2 (30.3 t ha-1) and T3 (27.3 t ha-1). In contrast, the treatment T4 coconut monocrop alone had sequestered 25.6 t ha-1. The below-ground soil carbon stock in the rhizosphere of different crops was the highest in the nutrient management under T3 followed by T2 and T1, whereas, it was the lowest in coconut monocrop. The productivity of the system was higher in the intercropping garden. The coconut nut yield (5-year average) was higher yield under T1 (147.2 nuts palm-1 year-1), followed by T2 (138.4 nuts palm-1 year-1) and T3 (123.6 nuts palm-1 year-1), whereas, monocrop had recorded a significantly lower number of nuts (97.2 nuts palm-1 year-1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":36468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plantation Crops\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"103-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plantation Crops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2020.v48.i2.6368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plantation Crops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2020.v48.i2.6368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2013-2018年,在印度马哈拉施特拉邦Bhatye(DBSKKV,Dapoli)的区域椰子研究站进行了一项实地实验,以研究椰子种植系统中综合营养管理(INM)实践对生产力和碳固存潜力的影响。INM实践,即T175%的推荐肥料剂量(RDF)+25%的N通过蚯蚓堆肥的有机回收,T250%的RDF+50%的N通过有机回收蚯蚓堆肥+施用蚯蚓粪+施用生物肥料+原位绿肥(豇豆),T3完全有机:在以椰子为基础的种植体系中,通过有机回收,施用蚯蚓堆肥+蚯蚓粪+施用生物肥料+原位绿肥(豇豆)和绿叶肥+堆肥椰髓、外壳掺入和椰子叶覆盖,实现了100%的氮,包括肉豆蔻、肉桂、香蕉和菠萝。为了进行比较,T4对照:使用推荐的NPK和有机肥料维持椰子单作。将四个处理方案分别布置在0.11公顷的区块中。在不同的INM实践中,处理T1封存了最高量的地上(椰子+肉豆蔻)碳储量(31.1吨ha-1),其次是T2(30.3吨ha-1)和T3(27.3吨ha-1)。相比之下,T4椰子单作单独处理的螯合量为25.6t ha-1。不同作物根际土壤碳储量在T3营养管理下最高,其次是T2和T1,而在椰子单作中最低。该系统在间作花园中的生产力较高。在T1条件下,椰子产量(5年平均值)较高(147.2个棕榈1年-1),其次是T2(138.4个棕榈1一年-1)和T3(123.6个棕榈1 1一年-2),而单作的坚果数量显著较低(97.2个棕榈1岁-1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Productivity and carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based cropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management practices
A field experiment was carried out at Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye (DBSKKV, Dapoli), Maharashtra State (India) during 2013-2018 to study the productivity and carbon sequestration potential as influenced by integrated nutrient management (INM) practices in coconut based cropping system. INM practices viz., T175 per cent of Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF) + 25 per cent of N through organic recycling with vermicompost, T250 per cent of RDF + 50 per cent of N through organic recycling with vermicompost + vermiwash application + bio-fertilizer application + in situ green manuring (cowpea), T3fully organic: 100 per cent N through organic recycling with vermicompost + vermiwash application + bio-fertilizer application + in situ green manuring (cowpea) and green leaf manuring + composted coir pith, husk incorporation and mulching with coconut leaves were imposed in coconut based cropping system involving nutmeg, cinnamon, banana and pineapple. For comparison, T4control: monocrop of coconut with recommended NPK and organic manure was maintained. Four treatments were laid out in blocks of 0.11 ha area each. Among the different INM practices, treatment T1 sequestered the highest amount of above ground (coconut + nutmeg) carbon stock (31.1 t ha-1) followed by T2 (30.3 t ha-1) and T3 (27.3 t ha-1). In contrast, the treatment T4 coconut monocrop alone had sequestered 25.6 t ha-1. The below-ground soil carbon stock in the rhizosphere of different crops was the highest in the nutrient management under T3 followed by T2 and T1, whereas, it was the lowest in coconut monocrop. The productivity of the system was higher in the intercropping garden. The coconut nut yield (5-year average) was higher yield under T1 (147.2 nuts palm-1 year-1), followed by T2 (138.4 nuts palm-1 year-1) and T3 (123.6 nuts palm-1 year-1), whereas, monocrop had recorded a significantly lower number of nuts (97.2 nuts palm-1 year-1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Plantation Crops
Journal of Plantation Crops Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信