除了数据保护问题，还有欧洲乘客姓名记录系统

Q1 Social Sciences

Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2021-09-14 DOI:10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221

Henrik Palmer Olsen, Cornelius Wiesener

{"title":"除了数据保护问题，还有欧洲乘客姓名记录系统","authors":"Henrik Palmer Olsen, Cornelius Wiesener","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we examine the European framework of collecting and analysing flight passenger name record (PNR) data for the purpose of combating terrorism and serious crime. The focus is mainly on the EU PNR Directive of 2016, but we also consider the specific legislative framework in Germany and Denmark. In light of the recent review of the Directive, the article aims at exploring the policy-related, legal and technological challenges. In doing so, it goes beyond established data protection concerns. In particular, we debunk the popular claim that PNR analysis in and of itself entails the risk of discrimination of certain groups – a claim commonly levelled against algorithmic analysis. We also provide useful insights into the specific legal safeguards vis-à-vis automated profiling and decision-making through human review. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 7 July 2020; Accepted 14 February 2021","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system\",\"authors\":\"Henrik Palmer Olsen, Cornelius Wiesener\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we examine the European framework of collecting and analysing flight passenger name record (PNR) data for the purpose of combating terrorism and serious crime. The focus is mainly on the EU PNR Directive of 2016, but we also consider the specific legislative framework in Germany and Denmark. In light of the recent review of the Directive, the article aims at exploring the policy-related, legal and technological challenges. In doing so, it goes beyond established data protection concerns. In particular, we debunk the popular claim that PNR analysis in and of itself entails the risk of discrimination of certain groups – a claim commonly levelled against algorithmic analysis. We also provide useful insights into the specific legal safeguards vis-à-vis automated profiling and decision-making through human review. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 7 July 2020; Accepted 14 February 2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":37639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Innovation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Innovation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Innovation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇文章中，我们考察了欧洲为打击恐怖主义和严重犯罪而收集和分析航班乘客姓名记录数据的框架。重点是2016年欧盟PNR指令，但我们也考虑了德国和丹麦的具体立法框架。根据最近对该指令的审查，本文旨在探讨与政策相关的法律和技术挑战。在这样做的过程中，它超越了既定的数据保护问题。特别是，我们驳斥了一种流行的说法，即PNR分析本身就存在歧视某些群体的风险——这种说法通常针对算法分析。我们还通过人工审查提供了关于自动分析和决策的具体法律保障的有用见解。文章历史接收日期：2020年7月7日；2021年2月14日接受

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Beyond data protection concerns – the European passenger name record system

In this article, we examine the European framework of collecting and analysing flight passenger name record (PNR) data for the purpose of combating terrorism and serious crime. The focus is mainly on the EU PNR Directive of 2016, but we also consider the specific legislative framework in Germany and Denmark. In light of the recent review of the Directive, the article aims at exploring the policy-related, legal and technological challenges. In doing so, it goes beyond established data protection concerns. In particular, we debunk the popular claim that PNR analysis in and of itself entails the risk of discrimination of certain groups – a claim commonly levelled against algorithmic analysis. We also provide useful insights into the specific legal safeguards vis-à-vis automated profiling and decision-making through human review. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 7 July 2020; Accepted 14 February 2021

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law, Innovation and Technology Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Stem cell research, cloning, GMOs ... How do regulations affect such emerging technologies? What impact do new technologies have on law? And can we rely on technology itself as a regulatory tool? The meeting of law and technology is rapidly becoming an increasingly significant (and controversial) topic. Law, Innovation and Technology is, however, the only journal to engage fully with it, setting an innovative and distinctive agenda for lawyers, ethicists and policy makers. Spanning ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, robotics and AI, it offers a unique forum for the highest level of reflection on this essential area.