桩基础在垂直和横向振动下的动力特性:对现有规范和手册的审查

Q2 Engineering
M. Khalil, Asmaa M. Hassan, H. Elmamlouk
{"title":"桩基础在垂直和横向振动下的动力特性:对现有规范和手册的审查","authors":"M. Khalil, Asmaa M. Hassan, H. Elmamlouk","doi":"10.1080/16874048.2020.1729586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Designing structures subjected to dynamic loads is quite complex and involve structural, mechanical, geotechnical engineering and the theory of vibration. Machines, buildings under seismic effect, and wind turbines induce both dynamic and static loads on their foundations. If these structures are supported on piles, a full understanding is required of the dynamic interaction between individual piles and soil (pile-soil interaction) and between adjacent piles (pile-soil-pile interaction). Due to the complexity of this problem, codes and manuals recommend the use of approximate approaches. However, there is a general lack in research concerning the accuracy of these approaches. The present paper aims to help filling this gap by comparing the recommendations from selected codes and manuals with the results obtained from the numerical analysis. The codes and manuals considered in this paper are the Egyptian Code (EC), ACI, and the Canadian Manual (CM). This comparison is held over a range of parameters including excitation force frequency (f), soil modulus of elasticity (Es), pile slenderness Ratio (L/D), dimensionless spacing ratio (S/D) and pile group size (ng). At the end of this study, advantageous and downfalls of these approaches are discussed.","PeriodicalId":31454,"journal":{"name":"HBRC Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"39 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16874048.2020.1729586","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic behavior of pile foundations under vertical and lateral vibrations: review of existing codes and manuals\",\"authors\":\"M. Khalil, Asmaa M. Hassan, H. Elmamlouk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16874048.2020.1729586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Designing structures subjected to dynamic loads is quite complex and involve structural, mechanical, geotechnical engineering and the theory of vibration. Machines, buildings under seismic effect, and wind turbines induce both dynamic and static loads on their foundations. If these structures are supported on piles, a full understanding is required of the dynamic interaction between individual piles and soil (pile-soil interaction) and between adjacent piles (pile-soil-pile interaction). Due to the complexity of this problem, codes and manuals recommend the use of approximate approaches. However, there is a general lack in research concerning the accuracy of these approaches. The present paper aims to help filling this gap by comparing the recommendations from selected codes and manuals with the results obtained from the numerical analysis. The codes and manuals considered in this paper are the Egyptian Code (EC), ACI, and the Canadian Manual (CM). This comparison is held over a range of parameters including excitation force frequency (f), soil modulus of elasticity (Es), pile slenderness Ratio (L/D), dimensionless spacing ratio (S/D) and pile group size (ng). At the end of this study, advantageous and downfalls of these approaches are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HBRC Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16874048.2020.1729586\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HBRC Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2020.1729586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HBRC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2020.1729586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

动荷载作用下的结构设计是一个非常复杂的问题,涉及结构、力学、岩土工程和振动理论。机器、受地震影响的建筑物和风力涡轮机在其基础上产生动、静载荷。如果这些结构是在桩上支撑的,则需要充分了解单个桩与土之间的动力相互作用(桩-土相互作用)以及相邻桩之间的动力相互作用(桩-土-桩相互作用)。由于这个问题的复杂性,代码和手册建议使用近似方法。然而,关于这些方法的准确性的研究普遍缺乏。本文旨在通过比较所选规范和手册的建议与从数值分析中获得的结果来帮助填补这一空白。本文考虑的代码和手册是埃及代码(EC), ACI和加拿大手册(CM)。这种比较是在一系列参数上进行的,包括激励力频率(f)、土壤弹性模量(Es)、桩长细比(L/D)、无量纲间距比(S/D)和桩群尺寸(ng)。在本研究的最后,讨论了这些方法的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic behavior of pile foundations under vertical and lateral vibrations: review of existing codes and manuals
ABSTRACT Designing structures subjected to dynamic loads is quite complex and involve structural, mechanical, geotechnical engineering and the theory of vibration. Machines, buildings under seismic effect, and wind turbines induce both dynamic and static loads on their foundations. If these structures are supported on piles, a full understanding is required of the dynamic interaction between individual piles and soil (pile-soil interaction) and between adjacent piles (pile-soil-pile interaction). Due to the complexity of this problem, codes and manuals recommend the use of approximate approaches. However, there is a general lack in research concerning the accuracy of these approaches. The present paper aims to help filling this gap by comparing the recommendations from selected codes and manuals with the results obtained from the numerical analysis. The codes and manuals considered in this paper are the Egyptian Code (EC), ACI, and the Canadian Manual (CM). This comparison is held over a range of parameters including excitation force frequency (f), soil modulus of elasticity (Es), pile slenderness Ratio (L/D), dimensionless spacing ratio (S/D) and pile group size (ng). At the end of this study, advantageous and downfalls of these approaches are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信