{"title":"(二)构建中国儿童的平等、多样性和包容性:交叉视角和跨学科方法","authors":"Yan Zhu, Yuchen Wang, Yuwei Xu, Run Tan","doi":"10.1177/20436106231178008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the universalisation of the UNCRC since 1989 tends to be perceived as a landmark for international consensus on realising children’s rights to dignity, development and participation, evidence suggests that inequality, exclusion and social injustice in childhoods continue to prevail across the globe (Clark et al., 2020; Lareau, 2011). Groups of children’s lives, opportunities and access to provision and services are deprived by a range of barriers relating to diversity issues such as gender, disability, migration, ethnicity and socioeconomic status (Konstantoni and Emejulu, 2017). In recent years, the UN Sustainable Development Goals have been influential in highlighting the crucial interdependence of equity and sustainability (Minujin and Ferrer, 2016), reiterating the necessity to seek effective, collective and transformative solutions to unfairness, crisis and divide in human societies. Nevertheless, despite that children’s welfare has been considered in both contexts of the UNCRC and the SDGs, researchers raised concerns over issues in international policies such as the invisibility of children’s roles and contributions (Croke et al., 2021) and the risk of reproducing discrimination and exclusion against certain groups (Davis and Watson, 2000).","PeriodicalId":37143,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies of Childhood","volume":"13 1","pages":"95 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Re)Constructing equality, diversity, and inclusion in Chinese childhoods: Intersectional perspectives and transdisciplinary approaches\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhu, Yuchen Wang, Yuwei Xu, Run Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20436106231178008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the universalisation of the UNCRC since 1989 tends to be perceived as a landmark for international consensus on realising children’s rights to dignity, development and participation, evidence suggests that inequality, exclusion and social injustice in childhoods continue to prevail across the globe (Clark et al., 2020; Lareau, 2011). Groups of children’s lives, opportunities and access to provision and services are deprived by a range of barriers relating to diversity issues such as gender, disability, migration, ethnicity and socioeconomic status (Konstantoni and Emejulu, 2017). In recent years, the UN Sustainable Development Goals have been influential in highlighting the crucial interdependence of equity and sustainability (Minujin and Ferrer, 2016), reiterating the necessity to seek effective, collective and transformative solutions to unfairness, crisis and divide in human societies. Nevertheless, despite that children’s welfare has been considered in both contexts of the UNCRC and the SDGs, researchers raised concerns over issues in international policies such as the invisibility of children’s roles and contributions (Croke et al., 2021) and the risk of reproducing discrimination and exclusion against certain groups (Davis and Watson, 2000).\",\"PeriodicalId\":37143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"95 - 101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106231178008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies of Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106231178008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管自1989年以来《联合国儿童权利公约》的普遍化往往被视为实现儿童尊严、发展权和参与权的国际共识的里程碑,但有证据表明,儿童时期的不平等、排斥和社会不公正在全球范围内继续盛行(Clark et al., 2020;Lareau, 2011)。由于与性别、残疾、移民、种族和社会经济地位等多样性问题有关的一系列障碍,儿童群体的生活、机会和获得提供和服务的机会被剥夺了(Konstantoni和Emejulu, 2017)。近年来,联合国可持续发展目标在强调公平和可持续性之间至关重要的相互依存关系方面发挥了重要作用(Minujin和Ferrer, 2016),重申有必要寻求有效的、集体的和变革性的解决方案,以解决人类社会中的不公平、危机和分歧。然而,尽管《联合国儿童权利公约》和可持续发展目标都考虑到了儿童福利问题,但研究人员对国际政策中的一些问题提出了担忧,例如儿童的角色和贡献被忽视(Croke et al., 2021),以及对某些群体的歧视和排斥再现的风险(Davis and Watson, 2000)。
(Re)Constructing equality, diversity, and inclusion in Chinese childhoods: Intersectional perspectives and transdisciplinary approaches
Although the universalisation of the UNCRC since 1989 tends to be perceived as a landmark for international consensus on realising children’s rights to dignity, development and participation, evidence suggests that inequality, exclusion and social injustice in childhoods continue to prevail across the globe (Clark et al., 2020; Lareau, 2011). Groups of children’s lives, opportunities and access to provision and services are deprived by a range of barriers relating to diversity issues such as gender, disability, migration, ethnicity and socioeconomic status (Konstantoni and Emejulu, 2017). In recent years, the UN Sustainable Development Goals have been influential in highlighting the crucial interdependence of equity and sustainability (Minujin and Ferrer, 2016), reiterating the necessity to seek effective, collective and transformative solutions to unfairness, crisis and divide in human societies. Nevertheless, despite that children’s welfare has been considered in both contexts of the UNCRC and the SDGs, researchers raised concerns over issues in international policies such as the invisibility of children’s roles and contributions (Croke et al., 2021) and the risk of reproducing discrimination and exclusion against certain groups (Davis and Watson, 2000).