{"title":"老年友好社区背景下的社会连接概念","authors":"V. Menec","doi":"10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2011, colleagues and I (Menec, Means, Keating, Parkhurst, & Eales, 2011) conceptualized age-friendly communities from an ecological perspective in order to highlight key assumptions of the interplay between the person and the environment, including both the community environment and the larger policy and political environment. Moreover, we proposed that a basic benefit of an age-friendly community is that it creates social connectivity. Fundamentally, we argued, age-friendly communities create connections—between the older person and the environment in which he or she lives and vice versa. The purpose of the present article is to expand on the notion of social connectivity. By drawing on diverse bodies of literature, such as social epidemiology, community development, empowerment, and organizational effectiveness, I aim to conceptualize social connectivity in terms of four interrelated components: (1) creating connections; (2) empowerment; (3) social influence; and (4) access to material resources and services. Consistent with ecological theory, each of these components is described at the individual, organizational, and community level. Implications for implementing age-friendly initiatives and research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing for the Elderly","volume":"31 1","pages":"116 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing Social Connectivity in the Context of Age-Friendly Communities\",\"authors\":\"V. Menec\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In 2011, colleagues and I (Menec, Means, Keating, Parkhurst, & Eales, 2011) conceptualized age-friendly communities from an ecological perspective in order to highlight key assumptions of the interplay between the person and the environment, including both the community environment and the larger policy and political environment. Moreover, we proposed that a basic benefit of an age-friendly community is that it creates social connectivity. Fundamentally, we argued, age-friendly communities create connections—between the older person and the environment in which he or she lives and vice versa. The purpose of the present article is to expand on the notion of social connectivity. By drawing on diverse bodies of literature, such as social epidemiology, community development, empowerment, and organizational effectiveness, I aim to conceptualize social connectivity in terms of four interrelated components: (1) creating connections; (2) empowerment; (3) social influence; and (4) access to material resources and services. Consistent with ecological theory, each of these components is described at the individual, organizational, and community level. Implications for implementing age-friendly initiatives and research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Housing for the Elderly\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"116 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Housing for the Elderly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing for the Elderly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conceptualizing Social Connectivity in the Context of Age-Friendly Communities
ABSTRACT In 2011, colleagues and I (Menec, Means, Keating, Parkhurst, & Eales, 2011) conceptualized age-friendly communities from an ecological perspective in order to highlight key assumptions of the interplay between the person and the environment, including both the community environment and the larger policy and political environment. Moreover, we proposed that a basic benefit of an age-friendly community is that it creates social connectivity. Fundamentally, we argued, age-friendly communities create connections—between the older person and the environment in which he or she lives and vice versa. The purpose of the present article is to expand on the notion of social connectivity. By drawing on diverse bodies of literature, such as social epidemiology, community development, empowerment, and organizational effectiveness, I aim to conceptualize social connectivity in terms of four interrelated components: (1) creating connections; (2) empowerment; (3) social influence; and (4) access to material resources and services. Consistent with ecological theory, each of these components is described at the individual, organizational, and community level. Implications for implementing age-friendly initiatives and research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Housing is more than houses-it is the foundation upon which the essentials of life are anchored. The quality of housing can enhance or diminish the well-being of individuals and families as well as that of the entire community. Before the Journal of Housing for the Elderly, housing for the elderly as a subject area has a relatively brief history. The Journal of Housing for the Elderly aims to serve the needs of gerontological professionals in the fields of architecture and housing, urban planning, and public policy who are responsible for the residential environments of the elderly in the community.